Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Norm of Tradition: Gender Subordination and Women's Exclusion in International Relations

  • Laura Sjoberg (a1)


The survey data in “Women in International Relations” explains that women are underrepresented in international relations as a whole, and that this underrepresentation only grows at the higher ranks of our profession. In observing the “gender gap” in IR, the essay offers an interesting and important overview of the possible reasons for women's underrepresentation and points out some meaningful differences between women and men in terms of perspective in the discipline, publication productivity, and teaching style, among other things. Near the beginning of the essay, the authors set up alternative explanations for women's marginal position in the discipline. They note that while feminist scholars relate women's marginalization to gender subordination, “other scholars suggest that the content of women's scholarship contributes to their marginalization” (see p. 122). I would argue that women's differences and gender subordination might not be competing explanations for women's marginalization. Instead, it might be that gender subordination can explain both women's differences and women's underrepresentation in the field.



Hide All
Ackerly, Brooke A., Stern, Maria, and True, Jacqui. 2006. Feminist Methodologies For International Relations. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1987. Women and War. New York: Basic Books.
Enloe, Cynthia H. 1990. Bananas, Beaches & Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harding, Sandra G. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1989. “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14 (3): 533–57.
Hirschmann, Nancy. 1989. “Freedom, Recognition, and Obligations: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1217–44.
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
MacKinnon, Catherine. 1989. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peterson, V. Spike. 1999. “Sexing Political Identities/Nationalism as Heterosexism.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (1): 3465.
Peterson, V. Spike, and Runyan, Anne Sisson. 1999. Global Gender Issues. 2nd ed.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Pettman, Jan Jindy. 1996. Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics. London and New York: Routledge.
Phillips, Anne. 1987. Feminism and Equality. New York: New York University Press.
Scheman, Naomi. 1993. Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege. New York: Routledge.
Sylvester, Christine. 1990. “Feminists and Realists on Autonomy and Obligation in International Relations.” In Seminar 14. Center for International Studies, University of Southern California.
Tickner, J. Ann. 2001. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tickner, J. Ann, and Sjoberg, Laura. 2006. “Feminism.” In International Relations Theory, ed. Dunne, T., Kurki, M., and Smith, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185202.
United States Census. 2000. Demographic Profile Report. Available from (7 September 2007).
Youngs, Gillian. 2004. “Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to the world ‘We’ Live In.” International Affairs 80 (1): 7587.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Norm of Tradition: Gender Subordination and Women's Exclusion in International Relations

  • Laura Sjoberg (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.