Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Testing the Saturday Night Live Hypothesis: Fairness and Bias in Newspaper Coverage of Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign

  • Melissa K. Miller (a1), Jeffrey S. Peake (a1) and Brittany Anne Boulton (a1)

Studies of press coverage afforded women running for public office indicate that historically, women tend to garner less coverage overall and that the coverage they do receive tends to focus disproportionately on their appearance, personality, and family status at the expense of their qualifications and issue positions. This study examines newspaper coverage of U.S. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. Notably, Clinton did not allege that she was receiving too little coverage or coverage that focused disproportionately on her clothing or appearance. Rather, she charged that she was being treated negatively relative to her chief rival, U.S. Senator Barack Obama. More than 6,000 articles from 25 leading newspapers from across the country were content-coded from Labor Day through Super Tuesday in order to assess Clinton's coverage on two dimensions: traditional and tonal. On a range of traditional indicators of bias, such as coverage amount and mentions of candidate appearance, Clinton's coverage clearly broke established patterns typically afforded women presidential candidates. However, the tone of Clinton's coverage was decidedly negative relative to her male competitors. Normative implications of this mixed bag of fairness and bias are discussed.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Deborah Alexander , and Kristi Andersen . 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.

John H. Aldrich 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Karrin Vasby. Anderson 1999. “Rhymes with ‘Rich,’ ‘Bitch’ as a Tool of Containment in Contemporary American Politics.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 2 (3): 599623.

Karrin Vasby. Anderson 2002. “From Spouses to Candidates: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Elizabeth Dole, and the Gendered Office of U.S. President.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 5 (1): 105–32.

Andrew W. Barrett , and Lowell W. Barrington . 2005. “Bias in Newspaper Photograph Selection.” Political Research Quarterly (4): 609–18.

Andrew W. Barrett , and Jeffrey S. Peake . 2007. “When the President Comes to Town: Examining Local Newspaper Coverage of Domestic Presidential Travel.” American Politics Research 35 (1): 331.

Dianne G. Bystrom , Terry A. Robertson , and Mary Christine Banwart . 2001. “Framing the Fight.” American Behavioral Scientist 44 (12): 19992013.

Matthew Gentzkow , and Jesse M. Shapiro . 2006. “Media Bias and Reputation.” Journal of Political Economy 114 (2): 280316.

Andrew F. Hayes , and Klaus Krippendorff . 2007. “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data.” Communication Methods and Measures 1 (1): 7789.

Caroline Heldman , Susan J. Carroll , and Stephanie Olson . 2005. “She Brought Only a Skirt.” Political Communication 22 (3): 315–35.

Leonie Huddy , and Nayda Terkildsen . 1993a. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.

Leonie Huddy , and Nayda Terkildsen 1993b. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.

Farida. Jalalzai 2006. “Women Candidates and the Media: 1992–2000 Elections.” Politics & Policy 34 (3): 606–33.

Kim Fridkin. Kahn 1992. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of Gender and Media Effects in U.S. Senate Races.” Journal of Politics 54 (2): 497517.

Kim Fridkin. Kahn 1994. “The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 154–73.

Kim Fridkin Kahn , and Edie N. Goldenberg . 1991. “Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaign Coverage.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (2): 180–99.

Spiro. Kiousis 2005. “Compelling Arguments and Attitude Strength: Exploring the Impact of Second-Level Agenda Setting on Public Opinion of Presidential Candidate Images.” International Journal of Press/Politics 10 (2): 327.

Spiro Kiousis , Philemon Bantimaroudis , and Hyun Ban . 1999. “Candidate Image Attributes: Experiments on the Substantive Dimension of Second Level Agenda Setting.” Communication Research 26 (4): 414–28.

Jennifer. Lawless 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post–September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.

Mark. Leeper 1991. “The Impact of Prejudice on Female Candidates: An Experimental Look at Voter Inference.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (3): 248–61.

Jeffrey S. Peake 2007. “Presidents and Front-Page News: How America's Newspapers Cover the Bush Administration,” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (4): 5270.

Shirley M. Rosenwasser , and Norma G. Dean . 1989. “Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 13 (1): 7785.

Adam J. Schiffer 2006. “Assessing Partisan Bias in Political News: The Case(s) of Local Senate Election Coverage.” Political Communication 23 (1): 2339.

Kevin B. Smith 1997. “When All's Fair: Signs of Parity in Media Coverage of Female Candidates.” Political Communication 14 (1): 7182.

Matthew J. Streb Barbara Burrell , Brian Frederick , and Michael A. Genovese . 2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 7689.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 32
Total number of PDF views: 150 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 797 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.