Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution

  • Danny Hayes (a1)

Research has shown that voters are willing to stereotype candidates on the basis of their gender, which can sometimes pose obstacles and sometimes prove advantageous for female politicians. But the literature is uncertain about how candidate gender interacts with candidate party affiliation to shape voters' perceptions. In this article, I draw on political psychology, the women and politics literature, and recent work on partisan “trait ownership” to suggest that the application of gender stereotypes will be limited by the salience of partisan stereotypes. I use nationally representative survey data and a content analysis of news coverage from the 2006 U.S. Senate elections to test the argument. Focusing on voter evaluations of candidate traits, I find that party stereotypes are more powerful than gender stereotypes, and that assessments of candidate attributes can be affected by news coverage when candidates are portrayed in ways that challenge traditional partisan images. The results suggest that gender stereotyping is limited by the relevance of party stereotypes, and that as the Republican and Democratic parties continue to polarize at the elite level, the importance of partisan stereotyping is likely to increase.

Hide All
Alexander Deborah, and Andersen Kristi. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.
Aronson Elliot. 2004. The Social Animal. 9th ed.New York: Worth.
Aronson Elliot, and Linder Darwyn. 1965. “Gain and Loss of Esteem as Determinants of Interpersonal Attractiveness.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1(2): 156–71.
Bartels Larry M. 2002a. “The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections.” In Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, ed. King Anthony. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4469.
Bartels Larry M. 2002b. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–50.
Bem Daryl J., and McConnell H. K.. 1970. “Testing the Self- Perception Explanation of Dissonance Phenomena: On the Salience of Premanipulation Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 14: 2331.
Best Deborah L., and Williams John E.. 1990. Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Thirty-Nation Study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Bishin Benjamin G., Stevens Daniel, and Wilson Christian. 2006. “Character Counts?Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (2): 235–48.
Broverman Inge K., Vogel Susan R., Broverman Donald M., Clarkson Frank E., and Rosenkrantz Paul S.. 1972. “Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal.” Journal of Social Issues 28 (2): 5978.
Carroll Susan J., and Fox Richard L.. 2006. Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Conover Pamela Johnston, and Feldman Stanley. 1989. “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (4): 912–40.
Dabelko Kirsten La Cour, and Herrnson Paul S.. 1997. “Women's and Men's Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (1): 121–35.
Dijksterhuis Ap, Macrae C. Neil, and Haddock Geoffrey. 1999. “When Recollective Experiences Matter: Subjective Ease of Retrieval and Stereotyping.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (6): 766–74.
Dolan Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in the Year of the Woman.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.
Dolan Kathleen. 2004. “The Impact of Candidate Sex on Evaluations of Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (1): 206–17.
Dolan Kathleen. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (1): 3144.
Druckman James N. 2004. “Priming the Vote.” Political Psychology 25 (4): 577–94.
Fazio Russell H. 1995. “Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations: Determinants, Consequences, and Correlates of Attitude Accessibility.” In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, ed. Petty Richard E. and Krosnick Jon A.. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
Fazio Russell H., Powell M. C., Herr P. M.. 1983. “Toward a Process Model of the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Accessing One's Attitude upon Mere Observation of the Attitude Object.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (4): 723–35.
Fazio Russell H., and Williams Carol J.. 1986. “Attitude Accessibility as a Moderator of the Attitude-Perception and Attitude-Behavior Relations: An Investigation of the 1984 Presidential Election.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 505–14.
Fiorina Morris P., Abrams Samuel J., and Pope Jeremy C.. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Education.
Fowler Linda L., and Lawless Jennifer L.. 2009. “Looking for Sex in All the Wrong Places: Press Coverage and the Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Candidates.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (3): 519–36.
Fox Richard L., and Oxley Zoe M.. 2003. “Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success.” Journal of Politics 65 (3): 833–50.
Fridkin Kim L., and Kenney Patrick J.. 2009. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” Politics & Gender 5 (September): 301–24.
Fridkin Kim L., and Kenney Patrick J.. 2011. “The Role of Candidate Traits Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 6173.
Hamill Ruth, Lodge Milton, and Blake Frederick. 1985. “The Breadth, Depth, and Utility of Class, Partisan, and Ideological Schemata.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 850–70.
Hayes Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 908–23.
Hayes Danny. 2009. “Has Television Personalized Voting Behavior?Political Behavior 31 (2): 231–60.
Hayes Danny. 2010. “Trait Voting in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Politics Research 38 (6): 1102–29.
Helmreich Robert L., Spence Janet T., and Wilhelm John A.. 1981. “A Psychometric Analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire.” Sex Roles 7 (11): 10971108.
Herrnson Paul S., Lay J. Celeste, and Stokes Atiya. 2003. “Women Running ‘as Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” Journal of Politics 65 (1): 244–55.
Hetherington Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 619–31.
Hill Seth J., Lo James, Vavreck Lynn, and Zaller John. 2007. “The Opt-In Internet Panel: Survey Mode, Sampling Methodology and the Implications for Political Research.” (Accessed February 2, 2011).
Huckfeldt Robert, Levine Jeffrey, Morgan William, and Sprague John. 1999. “Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 888911.
Huckfeldt Robert, Mondak Jeffery J., Craw Michael, and Mendez Jeanette Morehouse. 2005. “Making Sense of Candidates: Partisanship, Ideology, and Issues as Guides to Judgment.” Cognitive Brain Research 23 (1): 1123.
Huddy Leonie, and Capelos Theresa. 2002. “Gender Stereotyping and Candidate Evaluation: Good News and Bad News for Women Politicians.” In The Social Psychology of Politics, ed. Ottati Victor C., Tindale R. Scott, Edwards John, Bryant Fred B., Health Linda, O'Connell Daniel C., Suarez-Balzacar Yolanda, and Posavac Emil J.. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2953.
Huddy Leonie, and Terkildsen Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.
Jacobson Gary C. 2007. “Referendum: The 2006 Midterm Congressional Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 122 (1): 124.
Kahn Kim Fridkin. 1992. “Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates.” Journal of Politics 54 (2): 497517.
Kahn Kim Fridkin. 1994. “Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 162–95.
Kahn Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kahn Kim Fridkin, and Kenney Patrick J.. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
King David C., and Matland Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595612.
Koch Jeffrey W. 1999. “Candidate Gender and Assessments of Senate Candidates.” Social Science Quarterly 80 (1): 9496.
Koch Jeffrey W. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–29.
Koch Jeffrey W. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens' Impressions of House Candidates' Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.
Kunda Ziva, Sinclair L., and Griffin D.. 1997. “Equal Ratings but Separate Meanings: Stereotypes and the Construal of Traits.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (4): 720–34.
Kunda Ziva, and Spencer Steven J.. 2003. “When Do Stereotypes Come to Mind and When Do They Color Judgment? A Goal-Based Theoretical Framework for Stereotype Activation and Application.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (4): 522–44.
Kunda Ziva, and Thagard P.. 1996. “Forming Impressions from Stereotypes, Traits, and Behaviors: A Parallel-Constraint-Satisfaction Theory.” Psychological Review 103 (2): 284308.
Larson Stephanie Greco. 2001. “Running as Women? A Comparison of Female and Male Pennsylvania Assembly Candidates' Campaign Brochures.” Women and Politics 22 (2): 107–24.
Lau Richard R., and Pomper Gerald M.. 2001. “Effects of Negative Campaigning on Turnout in U.S. Senate Elections, 1988–1998.” Journal of Politics 63 (3): 804–19.
Lau Richard R., and Redlawsk David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 951–71.
Lawless Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post– September 11 Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Fox Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDermott Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.
McGraw Kathleen M. 2003. “Political Impressions.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Sears David O., Huddy Leonie, and Jervis Robert. New York: Oxford University Press, 394432.
McKee John P., and Sheriffs Alex C.. 1957. “The Differential Evaluation of Males and Females.” Journal of Personality 25 (3): 356–71.
Paolino Phillip. 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 294313.
Payne B. K., Lambert A. J., and Jacoby L. L.. 2002. “Best Laid Plans: Effects of Goals on Accessibility Bias and Cognitive Control in Race-Based Misperceptions of Weapons.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38 (4): 384–96.
Petrocik John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.
Rahn Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 472–96.
Rosenwasser Shirley M., and Seale Jana. 1988. “Attitudes Toward a Hypothetical Male or Female Presidential Candidate—A Research Note.” Political Psychology 9 (4): 591–98.
Sanbonmatsu Kira, and Dolan Kathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 485–94.
Stangor Charles. 1988. “Stereotype Accessibility and Information Processing.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 14 (4): 694708.
Taylor Shelly E., and Fiske Susan G.. 1978. “Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 11, ed. Berkowitz L.. New York: Academic Press, 250–88.
Williams Leonard. 1994. “Political Advertising in the ‘Year of the Woman’: Did X Mark the Spot?” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Cook Elizabeth Adell, Thomas Sue, and Wilcox Clyde. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Williams Leonard. 1998. “Voter Reaction to Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Futures, ed. Thomas Sue and Wilcox Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.
Winter Nicholas J. G. 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans' Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior 32 (4): 587618.
Zaller John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller John, and Feldman Stanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions or Revealing Preferences?American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 579616.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 37
Total number of PDF views: 225 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 921 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.