Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-558cb97cc8-fpk9s Total loading time: 0.739 Render date: 2022-10-07T09:44:57.940Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Religious Identity and Descriptive Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

Walter Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University-Idaho
Matthew R. Miles*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University-Idaho
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Walter Schmidt, Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University-Idaho, 525 S. Center Street, Rexburg, ID 83462-2160. E-mail: jerico_soccer15@hotmail.com; or to: Matthew R. Miles, Department of Political ScienceBrigham Young University-Idaho, 525 S. Center Street, Rexburg, ID 83462-2160. E-mail: milesma@byui.edu.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Walter Schmidt, Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University-Idaho, 525 S. Center Street, Rexburg, ID 83462-2160. E-mail: jerico_soccer15@hotmail.com; or to: Matthew R. Miles, Department of Political ScienceBrigham Young University-Idaho, 525 S. Center Street, Rexburg, ID 83462-2160. E-mail: milesma@byui.edu.

Abstract

Drawing on the descriptive representation literature, we argue that religious identity is a social identity similar to gender or race, which leads a person to feel represented by someone who shares their religious identity. We argue that religious identity motivates approbation for public officials that is distinct from partisanship. We find that constituents who share the religious identity of their congressional representatives are significantly more likely to approve of their representative's performance in office. In addition, those who share a religious identity with President Obama are more trusting of him; particularly among those for whom religion is important. Finally, we find that shared religious identity moderates the relationship between partisanship and trust in the President. All else equal, Republicans who share a religious identity with President Obama are 500% more likely to trust him than a Republican who does not.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Paul Djupe, Marcus Schmidt, and three anonymous reviewers for their feedback on this manuscript. A previous version of this article was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association (2015) which would not have been possible without the generous support of the Thomas E. Ricks fund for mentored student research.

References

REFERENCES

Altemeyer, Bob, and Hunsberger, Bruce. 1992. “Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology Of Religion 2:113133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2012, “CCES Common Content, 2010.” http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/17705 (Accessed on June 29, 2016).Google Scholar
Banducci, Susan A., Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A. 2004. “Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation.” Journal of Politics 66:534556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Gilliam, Franklin D. 1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review 84:377393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2002. “The Effect of Legislative Diversity on Agenda Setting Evidence from Six State Legislatures.” American Politics Research 30:115142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A, and Haynie, Kerry L. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender And Race.” The Journal of Politics 61:658679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald Philip. 1986. “Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government. British Journal of Political Science 16:431453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Of Comparative Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2005. “The Social Transformation of Trust in Government.” International Review of Sociology 15:133154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, Abby. 2011. “Believing in Belonging: Belief and Social Identity in the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz, and Karps, Paul D. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components Of Responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2:233254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Friesen, Amanda, and Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander. 2014. “Do Political Attitudes and Religiosity Share a Genetic Path?Political Behavior doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9291-3.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2002. “The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation.” The American Political Science Review 95:589617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, Will M., Shariff, Azim F., and Norenzayan, Ara. 2011. “Do You Believe in Atheists? Distrust is Central to Anti-Atheist Prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101:1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, Jesse, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2010. “Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals into Moral Communities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 14:140150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, A Phillips, and Wollheim, Richard. 1960. “Symposium: How Can One Person Represent Another?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34:187224.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2007. “Representation and Backlash: The Positive and Negative Influence of Descriptive Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32:107133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided By Politics And Religion. New York, NY: Random House LLC.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Hawkesworth, Mary. Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97:529550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won't Work: Polarization, Political Trust, And The Governing Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, Jon R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Susan E, and Fagan, Deborah. 1988. “Race and Trust in Government Testing the Political Reality Model.” Public Opinion Quarterly 52:343350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsmeier, Matthew L. 2013. “Religion and Perceptions of Candidates' Ideologies in United States House Elections.” Politics and Religion 6:342372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Dominic, and Bering, Jesse. 2006. “Hand of God, Mind of Man: Punishment and Cognition in the Evolution of Cooperation.” Evolutionary Psychology doi:147470490600400119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Luke. 2007. “Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government.” American Journal of Political Science 51:241254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ludeke, Steven, Johnson, Wendy, and Bouchard, Thomas J. 2013. “Obedience to Traditional Authority: A Heritable Factor Underlying Authoritarianism, Conservatism and Religiousness.” Personality and Individual Differences 55:375380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes.” The Journal of Politics 61:628657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2007. “Voting for Catholic Candidates: The Evolution of a Stereotype.” Social Science Quarterly 88:953969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2009. “Religious Stereotyping and Voter Support For Evangelical Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 62:340354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Matthew R. 2015. “Some Folks You Just Can't Reach: The Genetic Heritability of Presidential Approval.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45:760777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. 1974. “Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970.” American Political Science Review 68:951972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, Orla T., Trew, Karen, Todd, Jennifer, Rougier, Nathalie, and McLaughlin, Katrina. 2007. “Religious and National Identity after the Belfast Good Friday Agreement.” Political Psychology 28:89103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, Ara, and Shariff, Azim F.. 2008. “The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality.” Science 322:5862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, Pippa. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2008. “Faith on the Hill: 2008.” http://www.pewforum.org/files/2008/12/appendix.pdf (Accessed on March 20, 2015).Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Public Trust in Government: 1958–2014.” 2014. http://www.people-press.org/2014/11/13/public-trust-in-government (Accessed on January 13, 2016).Google Scholar
Purzycki, Benjamin Grant, Apicella, Coren, Atkinson, Quentin D., Cohen, Emma, McNamara, Rita Anne, Willard, Aiyana K, Xygalatas, Dimitris, Norenzayan, Ara, and Henrich, Joseph. 2016. “Moralistic Gods, Supernatural Punishment and the Expansion Of Human Sociality.” Nature 530:327330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, Doreen A., and Hrynevich, Christine. 1985. “Ethnicity and Ethnic Identity: A Comparative Study of Greek-, Italian-, and Anglo-Australian adolescents.” International journal of psychology 20:723742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad, Lydia. 2016. Government Named Top U.S. Problem for Second Straight Year. Washington, DC: Gallup.Google Scholar
Sosis, Richard. 2000. “Religion and Intragroup Cooperation: Preliminary Results of a Comparative Analysis of Utopian Communities.” Cross-Cultural Research 34:7087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosis, Richard, and Alcorta, Candace. 2003. “Signaling, Solidarity, and the Sacred: The Evolution of Religious Behavior.” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 12:264274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1835. Democracy in America. 4 vols. London: Saunders and Otley.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, Maykel. 2004. The Social Psychology of Ethnic Identity. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Verkuyten, Maykel, and Yildiz, Ali Aslan. 2007. “National (dis) Identification and Ethnic and Religious Identity: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33:14481462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Carolyn. 2006. Lobbying for Inclusion: Rights Politics and the Making of Immigration Policy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Religious Identity and Descriptive Representation
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Religious Identity and Descriptive Representation
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Religious Identity and Descriptive Representation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *