Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-19T19:28:43.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two States in the Holy Land?: International Recognition and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2015

Nikola Mirilovic  and
David S. Siroky
Nikola Mirilovic*
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
David S. Siroky*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Nikola Mirilovic, Department of Political Science, Howard Phillips Hall, Room 302, University of Central Florida, 4297 Andromeda Loop North, Orlando, FL 32816. E-mail: nikola.mirilovic@ucf.edu; or David S. Siroky, Department of Political Science, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 873902, Tempe, AZ 85287-3902. E-mail: david.siroky@asu.edu
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Nikola Mirilovic, Department of Political Science, Howard Phillips Hall, Room 302, University of Central Florida, 4297 Andromeda Loop North, Orlando, FL 32816. E-mail: nikola.mirilovic@ucf.edu; or David S. Siroky, Department of Political Science, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 873902, Tempe, AZ 85287-3902. E-mail: david.siroky@asu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do states decide to extend or withhold international recognition in cases of contested sovereignty? We focus on how religion shapes the incentives of states in making this decision, both at the domestic level through religious institutions and at the international level through religious affinities. States with transnational religious ties to the contested territory are more likely to extend recognition. At the domestic level, states that heavily regulate religion are less likely to extend international recognition. We test these conjectures, and examine others in the literature, with two new data sets on the international recognition of both Palestine and Israel and voting on the United Nations resolution to admit Palestine as a non-member state observer, combined with global data on religious regulation and religious affinities. In cases of contested sovereignty, the results provide support for these two mechanisms through which religion shapes foreign policy decisions about international recognition.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 263 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Achen, C. 2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science 5:423–450 Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger 1976. Ockham's Razor: A Historical and Philosophical Analysis of Ockham's Principle of Parsimony. Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Brathwaite, Robert, and Bramsen, Andrew. 2011. “Reconceptualizing Church and State: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Separation of Religion and State on Democracy.” Politics and Religion 4:229–263.Google Scholar
Cerone, John. 2012. “Legal Implications of the UN General Assembly Vote to Accord Palestine the Status of Observer State – Insights – American Society of International Law, 16(37).” http://www.asil.org/insights121208.cfm (Accessed on Month/Day/Year).Google Scholar
Coggins, Bridget. 2011. “Friends in High Places: International Politics and the Emergence of States from Secessionism.” International Organization 65:433–467.Google Scholar
Diker, Dan. 2010. “The Palestinians' Unilateral ‘Kosovo Strategy’: Implications for the PA and Israel, 575 (January-February).” http://jcpa.org/article/the-palestinians-unilateral-kosovo-strategy-implications-for-the-pa-and-israel/ (Accessed on Month/Day/Year).Google Scholar
Dowty, Alan. 2005. Israel/Palestine. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Driessen, Michael D. 2010. “Religion, State, and Democracy: Analyzing Two Dimensions of Church-State Arrangements.” Politics and Religion 3:55–80.Google Scholar
Eden, Paul. 2013. “Palestinian Statehood: Trapped Between Rhetoric and Realpolitik.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62:225–239.Google Scholar
Ellis, Glynn. 2010. “Gauging the Magnitude of Civilization Conflict.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 3:219–238.Google Scholar
Finke, Roger, and Adamczyk, Amy. 2008. “The Association of Religion Data Archives (ARDA): Online Research Data, Tools and References.” Politics and Religion 1:456–470.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, James, Patrick, and Li, Yitan. 2009. “Religious Affinities and International Intervention in Ethnic Conflicts in the Middle East and Beyond.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 42:161–186.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2007. “Do Democracies Have Separation of Religion and State?” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40:1–25.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2006. “World Separation of Religion and State into the 21st Century.” Comparative Political Studies 39:537.Google Scholar
Giorgi Gvalia, Siroky, David S., Lebanidze, Bidzina, and Iashvili, Zurab. 2013. “Thinking Outside the Bloc: Explaining the Foreign Policies of Small States.” Security Studies 22:98–131.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry. 2000. “The Parade of Sovereignities: Testing Theories of Secession in the Soviet Setting.” British Journal of Political Science 30:31–56.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry. 2011. “Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics.” World Politics 63:581–617.Google Scholar
Hillman, Arye, and Potrafke, Niklas. 2012. “Beyond Criticism: Logrolling and Decoy Voting in the United Nations.” http://portal.idc.ac.il/en/schools/economics/about/Documents/Arye%20Hillman,%20Beyond%20criticism%20Logrolling%20and%20decoy%20voting%20in%20the%20United%20Nations.pdf (Accessed on Month/Day/Year).Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert, and Rosberg, Carl. 1982. “Why Africa's Weak States Persist.” World Politics 35:1–24.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Andrzej. 2001. Nationals and Expatriates. Population and Labor Dilemmas of the Gulf Cooperation Council States. Reading, PA: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 2011. “Sell Unipolarity? The Future of an Overvalued Concept.” In International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity, eds. Ikenberry, John, Mastanduno, Michael, and Wohlforth, William. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 1989. “Joining the Club of Nations.” International Studies Quarterly 33:199–231.Google Scholar
McCleary, Rachel M., and Barro, Robert J.. 2005. “Which Countries Have State Religions?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120:1331–1370.Google Scholar
Mirilovic, Nikola, and Ollapaly, Deepa. 2012. “Realists, Nationalists, and Globalists and the Nature of Contemporary Rising Powers.” In Worldviews of Aspiring Powers, eds. Nau, Henry, and Ollapally, Deepa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monteiro, Nuno P. 2014. Theory of Unipolar Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paquin, Jonathan. 2010. A Stability Seeking Power: US Foreign Policy and Secessionist Conflicts. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 2003. “Belief in Control: Regulation of Religion in China.” The China Quarterly 174:317–337.Google Scholar
“Recognizing the Palestinian State on the 1967 border & Admission of Palestine as a Full Member of the United Nations – PLO Negotiations Office.” www.nad-plo.org (Accessed on Month/Day/Year).Google Scholar
Rich, Timothy S. 2009. “Status for Sale: Taiwan and the Competition for Diplomatic Recognition.” Issues and Studies 45:159–188.Google Scholar
Ron, James. 2011. “Palestine, the UN, and the One-State Solution.” Middle East Policy 18:59–67.Google Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M. 1997. “Explaining the International Relations of Secessionist Conflicts: Vulnerability vs. Ethnic Ties.” International Organization 51:721–753.Google Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M. 2001. The Ties That Divide: Ethnic Politics, Foreign Policy, and International Conflict. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M. 2002. “Discrimination in International Relations: Analyzing External Support for Ethnic Groups.” Journal of Peace Research 39:27–50.Google Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M. 2007. “Ties versus Institutions: Revisiting Foreign Interventions and Secessionist Movements.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40:733–747.Google Scholar
Sarkissian, Ani. 2012. “Religious Regulation and the Muslim Democracy Gap.” Politics and Religion 5:501–527.Google Scholar
Sayigh, Yezid. 2000. “Palestine's Prospects.” Survival 42:5–20.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Brett D., and Phillips, James. 2011. “How the US Should Respond to the UN Vote for Palestinian Statehood–Heritage Foundation Backgrounder #2574.” http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/07/how-the-us-should-respond-to-the-un-vote-for-palestinian-statehood (Accessed on Month/Day/Year).Google Scholar
Siroky, David. 2011. “Explaining Secession.” In Research Companion on Secession, eds. Pavković, Aleksandr, and Radan, Peter. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 45–80.Google Scholar
Strezhnev, Anton, and Voeten, Erik. 2012. “United Nations General Assembly Voting Data.” http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/12379 UNF:5:iiB + pKXYsW9xMMP2wfY1oQ = V3 (Accessed on Month/Day/Year).Google Scholar
Voeten, Eric. 2012. “Data and Analysis of Voting in the UN General Assembly.” http://ssrn.com/abstract=2111149 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2111149 (Accessed January 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara. 2006. “Building reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but not Others.” American Journal of Political Science 50:313–330.Google Scholar
Yoffie, Adam G. 2011. “The Palestine Problem: The Search for Statehood and the Benefits of International Law.” Yale Journal of International Law 36:497–511.Google Scholar
Zartman, William. 1966. International Relations in the New Africa. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zunes Stephen. 2012. “Obama, Palestine and the United Nations.” http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/obama-palestine-and-the-united-nations (Accessed on March 2, 2012).Google Scholar