Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-w6vhv Total loading time: 0.236 Render date: 2022-11-29T19:32:47.655Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Political attitudes vary with detection of androstenone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2020

Amanda Friesen
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
Mike Gruszczynski*
Indiana University Bloomington
Kevin B. Smith
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
John R. Alford
Rice University
Correspondence: Mike Gruszczynski, The Media School at Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana. Email:
Get access


Building on a growing body of research suggesting that political attitudes are part of broader individual and biological orientations, we test whether the detection of the hormone androstenone is predictive of political attitudes. The particular social chemical analyzed in this study is androstenone, a nonandrogenic steroid found in the sweat and saliva of many mammals, including humans. A primary reason for scholarly interest in odor detection is that it varies so dramatically from person to person. Using participants’ self-reported perceptions of androstenone intensity, together with a battery of survey items testing social and political preferences and orientations, this research supports the idea that perceptions of androstenone intensity relate to political orientations—most notably, preferences for social order—lending further support to theories positing the influence of underlying biological traits on sociopolitical attitudes and behaviors.

© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017). The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277294. Scholar
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik , E., Levinson, D. J., & Nevitt, S. R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, R. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balzer, A., & Jacobs, C. M. (2011). Gender and physiological effects in connecting disgust to political preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 12971313. Scholar
Bittner, A., & Goodyear-Grant , E. (2017). Sex isn’t gender: Reforming concepts and measurements in the study of public opinionPolitical Behavior39(4), 10191041. Scholar
Booth, A., Granger, D. A., Mazur, A., & Kivlighan, K. T. (2006). Testosterone and social behaviorSocial Forces85(1), 167191. Scholar
Bremner, E. A. (2003). The prevalence of androstenone anosmiaChemical Senses28(5), 423432. ScholarPubMed
Castiello, U. (2006). Cross-modal interactions between olfaction and vision when grasping. Chemical Senses, 31(7), 665671. ScholarPubMed
Cowley, J. J., Johnson, A. L., & Brooksbank, B. W. L. (1997). The effect of two odorous compounds on performance in an assessment-of-people test. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2(2), 159172. Scholar
Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1994). Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: The convergence zone framework. In Koch, C. and Davis, J. L. (Eds.), Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 6174). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianismPolitical Psychology18(4), 741770. Scholar
Filsinger, E. E., Braun, J. J., Monte, W. C., & Linder, D. E. (1984). Human (Homo sapiens) responses to the pig (Sus scrofa) sex pheromone 5 alpha-androst-16-en-3-one. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 98(2), 219222. ScholarPubMed
Fiore, A. M., Yah, X., & Yoh, E. (2000). Effects of a product display and environmental fragrancing on approach responses and pleasurable experiences. Psychology & Marketing, 17(1), 2754.<27::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-C3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, A., & Ksiazkiewicz, A. (2015). Do political attitudes and religiosity share a genetic path? Political Behavior37(4), 791818. Scholar
Friesen, A., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2017). Physiological arousal and self-reported valence for erotica images correlate with sexual policy preferencesInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 449470. Scholar
Gloor, P., & Gubeman, A. H. (1997). The temporal lobe and limbic system. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157(11), 15971598.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. J., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015). No longer “beyond our scope”: The biological and non-conscious underpinnings of public opinion. In Berinsky, A. J. (Ed.), New directions in public opinion (2nd ed., pp. 186204). Routledge.Google Scholar
Gower, D. B., & Ruparelia, B. A. (1993). Olfaction in humans with special reference to odorous 16-androstenes: Their occurrence, perception and possible social, psychological and sexual impact. Journal of Endocrinology, 137(2), 167187. ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 10291046. ScholarPubMed
Gustavson, A. R., Dawson, M. E., & Bonett, D. G. (1987). Androstenol, a putative human pheromone, affects human (Homo sapiens) male choice performance. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101(2) 210212. ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98116. Scholar
Hatemi, P., & McDermott, R. (2012). Policing the perimeter: Disgust and purity in democratic debate. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4), 675687. Scholar
Havlicek, J., Murray, A. K., Saxton, T. K., & Roberts, S. C. (2010). Current issues in the study of androstenes in human chemosignaling. Vitamins & Hormones, 83, 4781. Scholar
Herz, R. S. (2014). Verbal priming and taste sensitivity make moral transgressions gross. Behavioral Neuroscience, 128(1), 2028. ScholarPubMed
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2013). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummer, T. A., & McClintock, M. K. (2009). Putative human pheromone androstadienone attunes the mind specifically to emotional information. Hormones and Behavior, 55(4), 548559. ScholarPubMed
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion, 23(4), 714725. Scholar
Insel, T. R., & Young, L. J. (2001). The neurobiology of attachment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(2), 129136. ScholarPubMed
Jacob, S., Garcia, S., Hayreh, D., & McClintock, M. K. (2002). Psychological effects of musky compounds: Comparison of androstadienone with androstenol and muscone. Hormones and Behavior, 42(3), 274283. ScholarPubMed
Jacob, T. J., Wang, L., Jaffer, S., & McPhee, S. (2005). Changes in the odor quality of androstadienone during exposure-induced sensitizationChemical Senses31(1), 38. ScholarPubMed
Keller, A. (2011). Genes and smells. The Biochemist, 33(6), 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, A., Zhuang, H., Chi, Q., Vosshall, L. B., & Matsunami, H. (2007). Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature, 449(7161), 468472. Scholar
Kirk-Smith , M. D., Booth, D. A., & Van Der Starre, H. (1980). Effects of androstenone on choice of location in others’ presence. In Olfaction and Taste VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste and of the Fourth Congress of the European Chemoreception Research Organization (pp. 397400). London: IRL Press.Google Scholar
Kline, J. P., Schwartz, G. E., & Dikman, Z. V. (2007). Interpersonal defensiveness and diminished perceptual acuity for the odor of a putative pheromone: Androstenone. Biological Psychology, 74(3), 405413. ScholarPubMed
Knaapila, A., Tuorila, H., Silventoinen, K., Wright, M. J., Kyvik, K. O., Cherkas, L. F., Keskitalo, K., Hansen, J., Martin, N. G., Spector, T. D., Kaprio, J., & Perola, M. (2008). Genetic and environmental contributions to perceived intensity and pleasantness of androstenone odor: An international twin study. Chemosensory Perception, 1(1), 3442. Scholar
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673676. ScholarPubMed
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455482. Scholar
Lundström, J. N., & Olsson, M. J. (2005). Subthreshold amounts of social odorant affect mood, but not behavior, in heterosexual women when tested by a male, but not a female, experimenter. Biological Psychology, 70(3), 197204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundström, J. N., Olsson, M. J., Schaal, B., & Hummel, T. (2006). A putative social chemosignal elicits faster cortical responses than perceptually similar odorants. NeuroImage, 30(4), 13401346. ScholarPubMed
McDermott, R., Johnson, D., Cowden, J., & Rosen, S. (2007). Testosterone and aggression in a simulated crisis gameAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science614, 1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R., Tingley, D., & Hatemi, P.K. (2014). Assortative mating on ideology could operate through olfactory cues. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 9971005. Scholar
Menashe, I., Man, O., Lancet, D., & Gilad, Y. (2003). Different noses for different people. Nature Genetics, 34(2), 143144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mombaerts, P. (1999). Molecular biology of odorant receptors in vertebrates. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 487509. ScholarPubMed
Morrin, M., & Ratneshwar, S. (2000). The impact of ambient scent on evaluation, attention, and memory for familiar and unfamiliar brands . Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 157165. Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., & Schaller, M. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(4), 10421051. ScholarPubMed
Neville, K. R., & Haberly, L. B. (2003). Olfactory cortex. In Shepherd, G. M. (Ed.), The synaptic organization of the brain (5th ed., pp. 415454). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., … Hibbing, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 16671670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pause, B. M. (2004). Are androgen steroids acting as pheromones in humans? Physiology & Behavior, 83(1), 2129. ScholarPubMed
Pause, B. M., Ferstl, R., & Fehm-Wolfsdorf , G. (1998). Personality and olfactory sensitivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(4), 510518. Scholar
Saxton, T., Lyndon, A., Little, A., & Roberts, S. (2008). Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women’s attributions of men’s attractiveness. Hormones and Behavior, 54(5), 597601. ScholarPubMed
Schaal, B., & Porter, R. H. (1991). “Microsmatic Humans” Revisited: The Generation and Perception of Chemical Signals. In P. J. B. Slater, J. S. Rosenblatt, C. Beer, & M. Milinski (Eds.), Advances in the Study of Behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 135199). Scholar
Sherwood, L. (2010). Human physiology: From cells to systems (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R, Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011a). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLOS ONE, 6(10), e25552. ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011b). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Reconceptualizing political ideologyPolitical Psychology32(3), 369397. Scholar
Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockhorst, U., & Pietrowsky, R. (2004). Olfactory perception, communication, and the nose-to-brain pathway. Physiology & Behavior, 83(1), 311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobin, V. A., Hashimoto, H., Wacker, D. W., Tankayanagi, Y., Langnaese, K., Caquineau, C., Noack, J.Landgraf, R.Onaka, T.Leng, G.Meddle, S. L.Engelmann, M., & Ludwig, M. (2010). An intrinsic vasopressin system in the olfactory bulb is involved in social recognition. Nature, 464(7287), 413417. ScholarPubMed
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103122. ScholarPubMed
Tybur, J. M., Merriman, L. A., Hooper, A. E. C., McDonald, M. M., & Navarrete, C. D. (2010). Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: Are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity really related? Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 147470491000800. ScholarPubMed
Vigil, J. (2008). Facial expression processing varies with political affiliation. Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (2010). Political leanings vary with facial expression processing and psychosocial functioning. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(5), 547558. Scholar
Wagner, M. W., Deppe, K. D., Jacobs, C. M., Friesen, A., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015). Beyond survey self-reports: Using physiology to tap political orientationsInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research27(3), 303317. Scholar
Wang, L., Chen, L., & Jacob, T. (2004) Evidence for peripheral plasticity in human odour response. Journal of Physiology, 554(1), 236244. ScholarPubMed
Wilson, G. D., & Patterson, J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatismBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology7(4), 264269. ScholarPubMed
Woodward, J., & Allman, J. (2007). Moral intuition: Its neural substrates and normative significance. Journal of Physiology-Paris , 101(4), 179202. ScholarPubMed
Wysocki, C. J., & Beauchamp, G. K. (1984) Ability to smell androstenone is genetically determined. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81(15), 48994902. ScholarPubMed
Zhou, W., & Chen, D. (2009). Sociochemosensory and emotional functions: Behavioral evidence for shared mechanisms. Psychological Science, 20(9), 11181124. ScholarPubMed
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Political attitudes vary with detection of androstenone
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Political attitudes vary with detection of androstenone
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Political attitudes vary with detection of androstenone
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *