Skip to main content
×
Home

Reproductive policy and the social construction of motherhood

  • Bonnie Stabile (a1)
Abstract

Background. Reproductive technologies allow women to embrace or forgo motherhood, but a woman’s ability to make autonomous reproductive choices depends on access to these technologies. In the United States, public policies — laws, regulations, appropriations, and rulings — have either broadened or narrowed this access.

Question. Have U.S. public policies affecting reproductive choices conformed to attitudinal distinctions about motherhood itself?

Methods. I identified policies covering infertility, contraception, and abortion and examined them contextually within the Ingram-Schneider social construction framework.

Findings. Women’s choices fell within social construction quadrants as being positively portrayed and powerful; negatively portrayed but powerful; positively portrayed but powerless; and negatively portrayed and powerless. Married heterosexual women embracing motherhood were likely to be viewed positively and to reap benefits. Women forgoing motherhood, poor women, and women seeking to form nontraditional families were likely to be viewed negatively and to bear burdens; critical among these burdens was restriction of access to technologies that could be used to support a decision to avoid motherhood or to achieve motherhood through nontraditional methods.

Conclusion. Yes, U.S. public policies affecting reproductive choices have conformed to attitudinal distinctions about motherhood itself. These policies may also have altered those choices.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Bonnie Stabile, Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, 3351 Fairfax Drive, MS3B1, Arlington, VA 22201. Email: bstabile@gmu.edu
References
Hide All
1 Baird Karen, Beyond Reproduction; Women’s Health, Activism and Public Policy (Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 2009).
2 United Nations, International Conference on Population and Development Program of Action — Twentieth Anniversary Edition(New York: United Nations Population Fund, 2014).
3 Pew Research Center, “Women and leadership: Public says women are equally qualified, but barriers persist,” January 2015, http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/01/14/women-and-leadership, accessed October 9, 2016.
4 Baird, p. 11.
5 Schneider Anne L., Ingram Helen, and deLeon Peter, “Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations,” Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed., Sabatier Paul A. and Weible Christopher M., eds. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2014), p. 129.
6 Almeling Rene, Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).
7 Berger Peter L. and Luckmann Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (London: Penguin Books, 1966).
8 Burr Vivien, Social Constructionism, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2015), pp. 25.
9 Schneider Anne and Ingram Helen, “Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design,” Journal of Public Policy , 1988, 8(1): 6180.
10 Schneider Anne and Ingram Helen, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy,” American Political Science Review , 1993, 87(2): 334347.
11 Ingram Helen and Schneider Anne L., “Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes,” Journal of Public Policy , 1990, 10(1): 6687.
12 Ingram Helen, Schneider Anne L., and deLeon Peter, “Social construction and policy design,” in Theories of the Policy Process, Sabatier Paul A., ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007), pp. 93128.
13 Schneider Anne L., Ingram Helen, and deLeon Peter, “Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations,” in Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed., Sabatier Paul A. and Weible Christopher M., eds. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2014), pp. 105150.
14 Schneider, Ingram, and deLeon, p. 136.
15 Sabatier Paul A. and Weible Christopher M., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2014).
16 Hacking Ian, The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 2, 35.
17 Lieberman Robert C., “Social construction (continued) — comment/reply,” American Political Science Review , 1995, 89(2): 437.
18 Schneider, Ingram, and deLeon, p. 129.
19 Schneider, Ingram, and deLeon, p. 112.
20 Schneider and Ingram, 1993, p. 338.
21 Ingram, Schneider, and deLeon, p. 102.
22 Schneider, Ingram, and deLeon, p. 111.
23 Waggoner Miranda R., “Motherhood preconceived: The emergence of the preconception health and healthcare initiative,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law , 2013, 38(2): 346347.
24 Ingram, Schneider, and deLeon, p. 103.
25 Hayghe Howard and Johnson Beverly, Perspectives on Working Women: A Databook (Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1980), http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED198299.pdf, accessed March 12, 2012.
26 U.S. Department of Labor, “Latest annual data: Women of working age,” 2014, http://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/latest_annual_data.htm, accessed April 16, 2016.
27 Mulligan Casey B., “When will women become a work-force majority?” New York Times, May 6, 2009, http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/06/when-will-women-become-a-majority-of-the-workforce, accessed March 6, 2012.
28 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Highlights of women’s earnings in 2014,” report 1058, November 2014, http://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-earnings/archive/highlights-of-womens-earnings-in-2014.pdf, accessed April 16, 2016.
29 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014.
30 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013, “Women’s earnings: 1979–2012,” November 4, 2013, http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2013/ted_20131104.htm, accessed October 11, 2016.
31 Ingram, Schneider, and deLeon, p. 101.
32 Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, “Fact sheet: Women in state legislatures 2015,” http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-state-legislature-2015, accessed April 16, 2016.
33 U.S. Census Bureau, “State and county quick facts,” http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00, accessed April 16, 2016.
34 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, “About WIC,” http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/aboutwic/mission.htm, accessed May 18, 2012.
35 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. “WIC program participation and costs,” http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/wisummary.htm, accessed May 21, 2012.
36 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. “WIC fact sheet,” April 2014, http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/WIC-Fact-Sheet.pdf, accessed April 16, 2016.
37 Blake John, “Return of the welfare queen,” CNN, January 23, 2012, http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/23/politics/weflare-queen, accessed March 14, 2013.
38 Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, “Reproductive health topics,” http://www.arhp.org/Topics, accessed October 7, 2016.
39 World Health Organization, “Sexual and reproductive health: Policy,” http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/sexual-and-reproductive-health/policy, accessed October 7, 2016.
40 Gillian B. White, “All the single ladies,” New York Times, March 1, 2016, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/06/books/review/all-the-single-ladies-by-rebecca-traister.html, accessed October 6, 2016.
41 National Conference of State Legislatures, “State laws related to insurance coverage for infertility treatment,” June 1, 2014, http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/insurance-coverage-for-infertility-laws.aspx, accessed April 16, 2016.
42 National Conference of State Legislatures, 2014.
43 Hawaii Revised Statutes 431: 10A-116.5, “In vitro fertilization procedure coverage,” http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrs2002/vol09_ch0431-0435e/hrs0431/hrs_0431-0010a-0116_0005.htm, accessed February 23, 2013.
44 Rhode Island General Laws 27-18-30, “Health insurance contracts — infertility,” http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/Statutes/TITLE27/27-18/27-18-30.HTM, accessed February 23, 2013.
45 Schneider, Ingram, and deLeon, p. 101.
46 Markens Susan, Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007).
47 Adam Liptak, “Supreme Court ruling makes same-sex marriage a right nationwide,” New York Times, June 26, 2015, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/27/us/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage.html, accessed October 3, 2016.
48 Resolve (The National Infertility Association), “Insurance coverage in your state,” http://www.resolve.org/family-building-options/insurance_coverage/state-coverage.html?referrer=https://www.google.com, accessed October 11, 2016.
49 Leonard Kimberly, “Who has the right to build a family?” US News and World Report, August 15, 2016, http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-15/same-sex-infertility-case-exposes-lack-of-access-to-reproductive-treatment, accessed October 3, 2016.
50 Adashi Eli Y., “JAMA forum: A same-sex infertility health insurance mandate in Maryland?” news@JAMA, May 20, 2015, https://newsatjama.jama.com/2015/05/20/jama-forum-a-same-sex-infertility-health-insurance-mandate-in-maryland, accessed October 24, 2016.
51 Schneider and Ingram, 1993, p. 338.
52 Greil Arthur L., McQuillan Julia, Scheffler Karinna M., Johnson Katherine M., and Slausen-Blevins Kathleen S., “Race-ethnicity and medical services for infertility: Stratified reproduction in a population-based sample of US women,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 2011, 52(4): 117.
53 Loftus Jeni and Namaste Paul, “Expectant mothers: Women’s infertility and the potential identity of biological motherhood,” Qualitative Social Review, 2011, 7(1): 36–54, http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume18/QSR_7_1_Loftus_Namaste.pdf, accessed May 15, 2013.
54 Watkins Kathryn J. and Baldo Tracy D., “The infertility experience: Biopsychosocial effects and suggestions for counselors,” Journal of Counseling and Development: JCD , 2004, 82(4): 394402.
55 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Infertility FAQs,” http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/Infertility/index.htm, accessed October 15, 2016.
56 Guttmacher Institute, “Insurance coverage of contraceptives,” http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_ICC.pdf, accessed October 11, 2016.
57 National Conference of State Legislatures, “Insurance coverage for contraception laws,” February 2012, http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/insurance-coverage-for-contraception-state-laws.aspx, accessed April 16, 2016.
58 Mosher W. D. and Jones Jo, “Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008,” Vital Health Statistics, 2010, 23(29), http://www.cdc.gov/NCHS/data/series/sr_23/sr23_029.pdf, accessed March 11, 2013.
59 Sonfield Adam and Gold Rachel Benson, “New study documents major strides in drive for contraceptive coverage,” Guttmacher Report on Public Policy , 2004, 7(2):, http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/07/2/gr070204.html, accessed March 11, 2013.
60 Schneider, Ingram, and deLeon, p. 105.
61 Goldberg Carey, “Insurance for Viagra spurs coverage for birth control,” New York Times, June 30, 1999, http://www.nytimes.com/1999/06/30/us/insurance-for-viagra-spurs-coverage-for-birth-control.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm, accessed March 11, 2013.
62 Henig Jess, “McCain’s Viagra moment,” FactCheck.Org, June 24, 2008, http://www.factcheck.org/2008/07/mccains-viagra-moment, accessed March 11, 2013.
63 Ingram, Schneider, and deLeon, p. 99.
64 “Limbaugh slut slur student Sandra Fluke gets Obama call,” BBC News, March 2, 2012, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17241803, accessed March 12, 2013.
65 Ingram, Schneider, and deLeon, p. 108.
66 Eisenstadt v. Baird, 2011, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_17, accessed March 12, 2013.
67 Sarah Kliff, “All states except Oregon now limit abortion access,” Washington Post, January 31, 2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/31/all-states-except-oregon-now-limit-abortion-access, accessed March 13, 2013.
68 Schneider and Ingram, 1993.
69 Ingram, Schneider, and deLeon, p. 112.
70 Mike Alberti, “Dozens of new state limits on abortions added in 2012,” Remapping Debate, January 30, 2013, http://www.remappingdebate.org/map-data-tool/dozens-new-state-limits-abortions-added-2012, accessed March 13, 2013.
71 Guttmacher Institute, “2012 saw second highest number of abortion restrictions ever,” January 2, 2013, http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2013/01/02/index.html, accessed March 13, 2013.
72 Guttmacher Institute, “State policies in brief: An overview of abortion laws,” April 1, 2016, https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws, accessed April 16, 2016.
73 Schneider Anne Larason and Ingram Helen, Policy Design for Democracy (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1997), p. 112.
74 Schneider and Ingram, 1997, p. 113 (Figure 5.3).
75 Guttmacher Institute, 2016.
76 Schneider and Ingram, 1993, p. 335.
77 Boonstra Heather D., “The heart of the matter: Public funding of abortion for poor women in the United States,” Guttmacher Policy Review , 2007, 10(1):, http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/10/1/gpr100112.html, accessed March 13, 2013.
78 Jones Rachel K., Upadhyay Ushma D., and Weitz Tracy A., “At what cost? Payment for abortion care by US women,” Women’s Health Issues , 2013, 23(3): e173e178.
79 Hankivsky Olena, An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework (Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University, 2012), http://www.sfu.ca/iirp/ibpa.html, accessed April 16, 2016.
80 Luckey Cara, “Commercial surrogacy: Is regulation necessary to manage the industry?,” Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender and Society , 2012, 26(2): 213234.
81 Ingram, Schneider, and deLeon, p. 121.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and the Life Sciences
  • ISSN: 0730-9384
  • EISSN: 1471-5457
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 55 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 478 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd November 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.