Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Imperfect sound forever: loudness wars, listening formations and the history of sound reproduction

  • Kyle Devine (a1)

The purpose of this paper is to provide some historical perspective on the so-called loudness war. Critics of the loudness war maintain that the average volume level of popular music recordings has increased dramatically since the proliferation of digital technology in the 1980s, and that this increase has had detrimental effects on sound quality and the listening experience. My point is not to weigh in on this debate, but to suggest that the issue of loudness in sound recording and playback can be traced back much earlier than the 1980s. In fact, loudness has been a source of pleasure, a target of criticism, and an engine of technological change since the very earliest days of commercial sound reproduction. Looking at the period between the turn-of-the-century format feud and the arrival of electrical amplification in the 1920s, I situate the loudness war within a longer historical trajectory, and demonstrate a variety of ways in which loudness and volume have been controversial issues in – and constitutive elements of – the history of sound reproduction. I suggest that the loudness war can be understood in relation to a broader cultural history of volume.

Hide All
Adorno T. 1990. ‘The curves of the needle’, October, 55, pp. 4855
Adorno T. 2002. ‘The radio symphony: an experiment in theory’, in Essays on Music, ed. Leppert R. (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press), pp. 251–70
Anon. 2008. ‘Fans say rock music too loud’, Rolling Stone, 1068/1069, p. 32
Anon. 2009. ‘The loudness wars: why music sounds worse’, NPR Music, 31 December. (accessed August 2010)
Balmain C. 1928. ‘Volume’, The Gramophone, 5/9, p. 401
Berger K. 1984. The Hearing Aid: Its Operation and Development (Livonia, MI, National Hearing Aid Society)
Berlioz H. 1882. A Treatise on Modern Instrumentation and Orchestration (London, Novello, Ewer & Co)
Bijsterveld K. 2008. Mechanical Sound: Technology, Culture and Public Problems of Noise in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)
Brooks A. 1928. ‘Round the recording studios’, The Gramophone, 5/12, pp. 487–90
Chion M. 1994. Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen (New York, Columbia University Press)
Cockayne E. 2007. Hubbub: Filth, Noise and Stench in England (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press)
Columbia. 1897. The Graphophone (Indianapolis, IN, Spear)
Connor S. 1997. ‘The modern auditory “I”’, in Rewriting the Self: Histories from the Renaissance to the Present, ed. Porter R. (London, Routledge), pp. 203–23
Corbin A. 1998. Village Bells: Sound and Meaning in the Nineteenth-Century French Countryside (New York, Columbia University Press)
Demuth N. 1947. An Anthology of Musical Criticism (London, Eyre & Spottiswoode)
Deruty E. 2011. ‘To the limit: “dynamic range” and the loudness war’, Sound on Sound, September, pp. 174–82
Devine K. 2012. ‘Imperfect sound forever: loudness, listening formations, and the historiography of sound reproduction’, PhD thesis (Ottawa, Carleton University)
Edison Company. 1905. ‘Wonderful Edison offer’, Popular Mechanics, 7/11, p. 1188
Eisenberg E. 1987. The Recording Angel: Explorations in Phonography (New York, McGraw-Hill)
Engh B. 1999. ‘After “His Master's Voice”’, New Formations, 38, pp. 5563
Everest F.A., and Pohlmann K. 2009. Master Handbook of Acoustics, 5th edn (New York, McGraw-Hill)
Faulkner C. 1994. ‘René Clair, Marcel Pagnol and the social dimension of speech’, Screen, 35/2, pp. 157–70
Feaster P. 2007. ‘The following record: making sense of phonographic performance, 1877–1908’, PhD thesis (Bloomington, IN, Indiana University)
Frith S. 1988. ‘The industrialization of music’, in Music for Pleasure: Essays in the Sociology of Pop (New York, Routledge)
Frith S. 2002. ‘Look! Hear! The uneasy relationship of music and television’, Popular Music, 21/3, pp. 277–90
Frow G., with Baumbach R. 2001. The Edison Disc Phonographs and the Diamond Discs (Los Angeles, CA, Mulholland Press)
Gelatt R. 1977. The Fabulous Phonograph, 1877–1977 (New York, Macmillan)
Gitelman L. 2000. Scripts, Grooves and Writing Machines: Representing Technology in the Edison Era (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)
Guberman D. 2011. ‘Post-fidelity: a new age of music consumption and technological innovation’, Journal of Popular Music Studies, 23/4, pp. 431–54
Hegarty P. 2007. Noise/Music: A History (New York, Continuum)
Hiatt B. 2008. ‘Fans complain Metallica disc is too loud’, Rolling Stone, 1063, p. 11
James F. 1998. The EMG Story (Abertillery, Old Bakehouse Publications)
Jones S. 2005. ‘The big squeeze: mastering engineers debate music's loudness wars’, Mix Magazine, 1 December. (accessed August 2008)
Keightley K. 1996. ‘Turn it down! she shrieked: gender, domestic space and high fidelity, 1948–59’, Popular Music, 15/2, pp. 149–77
Kittler F. 1999. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press)
Lambert C. 1934. Music Ho! A Study of Music in Decline (London, Faber & Faber)
Lastra J. 2000. Sound Technology and the American Cinema: Perception, Representation, Modernity (New York, Columbia University Press)
Levine R. 2007. ‘The death of high fidelity’, Rolling Stone, 1042/1043, p. 15
Luff L. 1928. ‘Volume’, The Gramophone, 5/9, p. 401
Mackenzie C. 1925. ‘The gramophone: its past: its present: its future’, Proceedings of the Musical Association, 51st sess. pp. 97119
Mauro P. 1900. ‘Recent development of the art of recording and reproducing sounds’, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 150/1, pp. 3543
Millard A. 2005. America on Record: A History of Recorded Sound (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
Milner G. 2009. Perfecting Sound Forever: An Aural History of Recorded Music (New York, Faber & Faber)
Mitchell O. ca. 1922. The Talking Machine Industry (London, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons)
Moogk E. 1975. Roll Back the Years: History of Canadian Recorded Sound and Its Legacy, Genesis to 1930 (Ottawa, National Library of Canada)
National Phonograph Company. 1900. The Phonograph and How to Use It (New York, Allen Koenigsberg)
Negus K. 2006. ‘Musicians on television: visible, audible and ignored’, Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 131/2, pp. 310–30
Percival M. 2011. ‘Stone deaf forever: discourses of live loudness in popular music journalism’, presented at The Business of Live Music, 30 April–2 May (University of Edinburgh)
Peters J.D. 2004. ‘Helmholtz, Edison and sound history’, in Memory Bytes: History, Technology and Digital Culture, ed. Rabinovitz L. and Geil A. (Durham, NC, Duke University Press), pp. 177–98
Plambeck J. 2010. ‘In mobile age, sound quality steps back’, New York Times, 9 May, p. B1
Read O., and Welch W. 1976. From Tin Foil to Stereo: Evolution of the Phonograph (Indianapolis, IN, Howard W. Sams)
Rothenbuhler E., and Peters J.D. 1997. ‘Defining phonography: an experiment in theory’, The Musical Quarterly, 81/2, pp. 242–64
Schafer R.M. 1994. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World (Rochester, VT, Destiny Books)
Schicke C. 1974. Revolution in Sound: A Biography of the Recording Industry (Boston, MA, Little, Brown & Co)
Schwartz H. 2011. Making Noise: From Babel to the Big Bang and Beyond (New York, Zone Books)
Sherwin A. 2007. ‘Why music really is getting louder’, The Times, 4 June. (accessed August 2010)
Smith E. 2008. ‘Even heavy-metal fans complain that today's music is too loud!!!’, The Wall Street Journal, 26 September, p. A1
Smith M. 2001. Listening to Nineteenth-Century America (Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press)
Southall N. 2006. ‘Imperfect sound forever’, Stylus Magazine, 1 May. (accessed August 2010)
Sreedhar S. 2007. ‘The future of music’, IEEE Spectrum, August. (accessed August 2010)
Sterne J. 2003. The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)
Sterne J. 2006. ‘The death and life of digital audio’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 31/4, pp. 343–5
Sterne J. 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)
Stokowski L. 1935. ‘New vistas in radio’, Atlantic Monthly, 155/1, pp. 116
Straw W. 2008. ‘Squawkies and talkies’, Parallax, 14/2, pp. 2030
Thompson E. 1995. ‘Machines, music and the quest for fidelity: marketing the Edison phonograph in America, 1877–1925’, Musical Quarterly, 79, pp. 131–71
Weston B. n.d. ‘Loudness’, Chicago Mastering Service. (accessed August 2010)
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Popular Music
  • ISSN: 0261-1430
  • EISSN: 1474-0095
  • URL: /core/journals/popular-music
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 101 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 616 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.