Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Imperfect sound forever: loudness wars, listening formations and the history of sound reproduction

  • Kyle Devine (a1)

The purpose of this paper is to provide some historical perspective on the so-called loudness war. Critics of the loudness war maintain that the average volume level of popular music recordings has increased dramatically since the proliferation of digital technology in the 1980s, and that this increase has had detrimental effects on sound quality and the listening experience. My point is not to weigh in on this debate, but to suggest that the issue of loudness in sound recording and playback can be traced back much earlier than the 1980s. In fact, loudness has been a source of pleasure, a target of criticism, and an engine of technological change since the very earliest days of commercial sound reproduction. Looking at the period between the turn-of-the-century format feud and the arrival of electrical amplification in the 1920s, I situate the loudness war within a longer historical trajectory, and demonstrate a variety of ways in which loudness and volume have been controversial issues in – and constitutive elements of – the history of sound reproduction. I suggest that the loudness war can be understood in relation to a broader cultural history of volume.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

T. Adorno 1990. ‘The curves of the needle’, October, 55, pp. 4855

K. Bijsterveld 2008. Mechanical Sound: Technology, Culture and Public Problems of Noise in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)

C. Faulkner 1994. ‘René Clair, Marcel Pagnol and the social dimension of speech’, Screen, 35/2, pp. 157–70

P. Feaster 2007. ‘The following record: making sense of phonographic performance, 1877–1908’, PhD thesis (Bloomington, IN, Indiana University)

S. Frith 2002. ‘Look! Hear! The uneasy relationship of music and television’, Popular Music, 21/3, pp. 277–90

D. Guberman 2011. ‘Post-fidelity: a new age of music consumption and technological innovation’, Journal of Popular Music Studies, 23/4, pp. 431–54

P. Mauro 1900. ‘Recent development of the art of recording and reproducing sounds’, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 150/1, pp. 3543

A. Millard 2005. America on Record: A History of Recorded Sound (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)

K. Negus 2006. ‘Musicians on television: visible, audible and ignored’, Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 131/2, pp. 310–30

E. Rothenbuhler , and J.D. Peters 1997. ‘Defining phonography: an experiment in theory’, The Musical Quarterly, 81/2, pp. 242–64

M. Smith 2001. Listening to Nineteenth-Century America (Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press)

J. Sterne 2003. The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)

J. Sterne 2006. ‘The death and life of digital audio’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 31/4, pp. 343–5

J. Sterne 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)

W. Straw 2008. ‘Squawkies and talkies’, Parallax, 14/2, pp. 2030

E. Thompson 1995. ‘Machines, music and the quest for fidelity: marketing the Edison phonograph in America, 1877–1925’, Musical Quarterly, 79, pp. 131–71

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Popular Music
  • ISSN: 0261-1430
  • EISSN: 1474-0095
  • URL: /core/journals/popular-music
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 78 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 475 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.