Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-hl5gf Total loading time: 1.802 Render date: 2023-01-31T21:46:15.953Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Impact of dietary fat on the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Ldlr−/− mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2015

Donald B. Jump*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Program, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon, 97331, USA
Christopher M. Depner
Affiliation:
Nutrition Program, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon, 97331, USA
Sasmita Tripathy
Affiliation:
Nutrition Program, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon, 97331, USA
Kelli A. Lytle
Affiliation:
Nutrition Program, School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon, 97331, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Professor D. B. Jump, fax 541-737-6914, email Donald.Jump@oregonstate.edu
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has increased in parallel with central obesity and is now the most common chronic liver disease in developed countries. NAFLD is defined as excessive accumulation of lipid in the liver, i.e. hepatosteatosis. The severity of NAFLD ranges from simple fatty liver (steatosis) to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Simple steatosis is relatively benign until it progresses to NASH, which is characterised by hepatic injury, inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis. Hepatic fibrosis is a risk factor for cirrhosis and primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Our studies have focused on the impact of diet on the onset and progression of NASH. We developed a mouse model of NASH by feeding Ldlr−/− mice a western diet (WD), a diet moderately high in saturated and trans-fat, sucrose and cholesterol. The WD induced a NASH phenotype in Ldlr−/− mice that recapitulates many of the clinical features of human NASH. We also assessed the capacity of the dietary n-3 PUFA, i.e. EPA (20 : 5,n-3) and DHA (22 : 6,n-3), to prevent WD-induced NASH in Ldlr−/− mice. Histologic, transcriptomic, lipidomic and metabolomic analyses established that DHA was equal or superior to EPA at attenuating WD-induced dyslipidemia and hepatic injury, inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis. Dietary n-3 PUFA, however, had no significant effect on WD-induced changes in body weight, body fat or blood glucose. These studies provide a molecular and metabolic basis for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of using dietary n-3 PUFA to prevent NASH in human subjects.

Type
Conference on ‘Diet, gene regulation and metabolic disease’
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

The Centres for Disease Control estimates that nearly 80 million adults( 1 ) and 13 million children( 2 ) in the USA are obese. Obesity is a risk factor for chronic metabolic diseases, such as CVD, metabolic syndrome (MetS), type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Our studies have focused on NAFLD. The prevalence of NAFLD has increased in parallel with incidence of central obesity( Reference Farrell and Larter 3 , Reference Cohen, Horton and Hobbs 4 ), and is now the most common fatty liver disease in developed countries( Reference Bellentani, Scaglioni and Marino 5 ). NAFLD is defined as excessive lipid accumulation in the liver, i.e. hepatosteatosis( Reference Angulo and Lindor 6 , Reference Neuschwander-Tetri and Caldwell 7 ). NAFLD is the hepatic manifestation of MetS( Reference Kim and Younossi 8 ); MetS risk factors include obesity, elevated plasma TAG and LDL-cholesterol, reduced HDL-cholesterol, high blood pressure and fasting hyperglycemia( Reference Alberti, Zimmet and Shaw 9 ). The prevalence of NAFLD in the general population is estimated to range from 6 to 30 % depending on the method of analysis and population studied( Reference Vernon, Baranova and Younossi 10 ).

NAFLD ranges from benign hepatosteatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)( Reference Angulo 11 ), where NASH is defined as hepatosteatosis with inflammation and hepatic injury( Reference Chalasani, Younossi and Lavine 12 ). Simple hepatosteatosis progresses to NASH in 30–40 % of patients( Reference McCullough 13 ); representing about 3–5 % of the general population( Reference Vernon, Baranova and Younossi 10 ). The type 2 diabetes population has a higher prevalence (⩾60 %) of NAFLD and NASH than the general population( Reference Prashanth, Ganesh and Vima 14 ). NASH patients have higher mortality rates than NAFLD patients; and both are higher than the general population( Reference Soderberg, Stal and Askling 15 Reference Adams, Lymp and St Sauver 17 ). NASH can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma( Reference Cohen, Horton and Hobbs 4 , Reference McCullough 13 ). Over a 10 year period, cirrhosis and liver related death occurs in 20 and 12 % of NASH patients, respectively( Reference McCullough 18 ). Cirrhosis resulting from NASH is projected to be the leading cause of liver transplantation in the USA by 2020( Reference McCollough 19 ). Given the increasing prevalence of NASH and its negative clinical outcomes, NASH is rapidly becoming a significant public health burden( Reference Leslie 20 ).

Multi-hit hypothesis for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis development

The development of NASH has been proposed to follow a multi-hit model( Reference Day and James 21 Reference Tilg and Moschen 23 ). The 1st Hit involves excessive neutral lipid accumulation which sensitises the liver to the 2nd Hit( Reference LaBrecque, Abbas and Anania 22 ) (Fig. 1). The 2nd Hit is characterised by hepatic insulin resistance, inflammation, oxidative stress leading to in hepatic damage that is associated with increased blood levels of hepatic enzymes/proteins, e.g. alanine aminotransferase( Reference Farrell and Larter 3 , Reference Cohen, Horton and Hobbs 4 , Reference Hashimoto, Tokushige and Farrell 24 ). The resulting hepatocellular death and necrosis promotes the 3rd Hit which involves activation of resident stellate cells and subsequent deposition of extracellular (fibrotic) matrix. Fibrosis is a tissue repair mechanisms that results in scarring; it is mediated by hepatic stellate cell activation and myofibrillar cell infiltration of the liver. These cells produce extracellular matrix proteins, including collagen (collagen 1A1), elastin and smooth muscle α2 actin( Reference Friedman 25 ). Dietary (excess fat, cholesterol, glucose and fructose), metabolic (plasma and hepatic fatty acid profiles, hepatic ceramide, oxidised LDL, bile acid metabolites), endocrine (insulin, leptin and adiponectin), gut (endotoxin, microbial metabolites) and genetic (e.g. patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 polymorphisms) factors have been implicated as triggers for NASH progression( Reference Abdelmalek, Suzuki and Guy 26 Reference Elinav, Ali and Bruck 34 ).

Fig. 1. Factors contributing to the onset and progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

Hepatosteatosis develops because of an imbalance of hepatic lipid metabolism leading to the accumulation of hepatic neutral lipids as TAG and diacylglycerols and cholesterol esters. In human subjects with NAFLD, about 60 % of the fat appearing in the liver is derived from circulating NEFA mobilised from adipose tissue; 26 % are from de novo lipogenesis and 15 % are from the diet( Reference Donnelly, Smith and Schwarzenberg 35 ). Hepatic fatty acid oxidation and VLDL assembly and secretion represent pathways for removal of liver fat. Hepatosteatosis develops when lipid storage exceeds lipid export or fatty acid oxidation. Both hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance also contribute to the disruption of these metabolic pathways( Reference Matherly and Puri 36 ).

NASH patients consume a lower ratio of PUFA to SFA when compared with the general population( Reference Toshimitsu, Matsuura and Ohkubo 37 , Reference Musso, Gambino and De Michieli 38 ). Furthermore, consumption of a low ratio of dietary n-3 PUFA to n-6 PUFA is also associated with NAFLD development, while increased consumption of dietary long-chain n-3 PUFA decreases hepatic steatosis( Reference Capanni, Calella and Biagini 39 Reference Levy, Clore and Stevens 41 ). Pachikian et al.( Reference Pachikian, Essaghir and Demoulin 42 ) recently reported that removal of all n-3 PUFA from a mouse diet promoted insulin resistance and hepatosteatosis in C57Bl/6J mice. While this diet lowered hepatic n-3 PUFA, including α-linolenic acid (18 : 3, n-3), EPA (20 : 5, n-3) and DHA (22 : 6, n-3), it did not affect hepatic n-6 PUFA content, i.e. linoleic acid (18 : 2, n-6) or arachidonic acid (20 : 4, n-6). Several hepatic transcription factors are regulated by C20–22 n-3 PUFA, including PPAR-α, sterol regulatory element binding protein-1, carbohydrate regulatory element binding protein and Max-like factor X( Reference Jump, Tripathy and Depner 43 ). PPAR-α is a fatty acid-regulated nuclear receptor. Activation of PPAR-α increases expression of enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation. Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 and the carbohydrate regulatory element binding protein /Max-like factor X heterodimer regulate the expression of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis and TAG synthesis. Dietary n-3 PUFA suppress the nuclear abundance of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 and carbohydrate regulatory element binding protein /Max-like factor X leading to the attenuation of expression of genes involved in fatty acid and TAG synthesis. Lowering hepatic n-3 PUFA, as reported by Pachikian et al. ( Reference Pachikian, Essaghir and Demoulin 42 ), promotes hepatosteatosis by suppressing hepatic fatty acid oxidation and stimulating fatty acid and TAG synthesis and storage. While trans-fatty acid consumption is associated with insulin resistance and CVD, the impact of trans-fatty acid consumption on NAFLD in human subjects is less clear( Reference Zelber-Sagi, Ratziu and Oren 44 ). In mice, however, trans-fatty acid consumption is associated with hepatic steatosis and injury( Reference Tetri, Basaranoglu and Brunt 45 , Reference Lottenberg, Afonso Mda and Lavrador 46 ).

High dietary cholesterol promotes hepatic inflammation( Reference Wouters, van Gorp and Bieghs 28 , Reference Wouters, van Bilsen and van Gorp 47 Reference Depner, Torres-Gonzalez and Tripathy 49 ) and contributes to NASH development( Reference Yasutake, Nakamuta and Shima 50 ). In the Ldlr−/− mouse model, high fat–high cholesterol feeding results in a robust NASH phenotype( Reference Walenbergh, Koek and Bieghs 51 ). Kupffer cells, i.e. resident hepatic macrophage, become engorged with oxidised-LDL, which induces inflammatory cytokine secretion. These locally secreted cytokines act on other hepatic cells and cause cellular injury. Kupffer cells also secrete chemokines (e.g. monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) that recruit monocytes to the liver, further promoting an inflammatory environment in the liver. As such, reducing hepatic inflammation is an obvious target for NASH therapy.

Over the past 30 years there has been a dramatic increase in obesity and NAFLD in the USA( Reference Farrell and Larter 3 , Reference Marriott, Olsho and Hadden 52 Reference Marriott, Olsho and Hadden 56 ). These changes in health status are associated with increased carbohydrate and total energy consumption, but not total fat consumption. Elevated carbohydrate, and specifically fructose, consumption has been linked to the development of NAFLD and NASH progression( Reference Vos, Kimmons and Gillespie 57 Reference Bizeau and Pagliassotti 59 ). The liver expresses the fructose-specific transporter (Glut5) and is responsible for metabolising up to 70 % of dietary fructose( Reference Lim, Mietus-Snyder and Valente 58 , Reference Bizeau and Pagliassotti 59 ). Fructose metabolism is independent of insulin. When compared with glucose, fructose more readily enters the pathway for de novo lipogenesis and TAG synthesis. Fructose promotes all aspects of MetS including hepatosteatosis, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, obesity and hypertension( Reference Leclercq, Field and Enriquez 60 ). In contrast to fructose, hepatic glucose metabolism is well-regulated by insulin; glucose is also converted to glycogen for storage. Excess glucose consumption does not promote hepatosteatosis as aggressively as excess fructose consumption. Fructose also affects several biochemical events that exacerbate NASH development, including formation of reactive oxygen species and advanced glycation end-products( Reference Schalkwijk, Stehouwer and van Hinsbergh 61 Reference Wei, Wang and Moran 64 ).

Treatment strategies for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

General therapeutic strategies for NAFLD/NASH start with life style management (diet and exercise) and treating the co-morbidities associated with NAFLD/NASH, e.g. obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia. The best strategy for managing NASH, however, has not been established( Reference Chan, de Silva and Leung 65 ). Clinical approaches to manage NAFLD/NASH focus on: (1) a reduction in overall body weight by using dietary and exercise therapy; (2) control blood glucose and dyslipidemia (cholesterol and TAG) by using pharmaceutical and/or dietary supplements, such as metformin, fibrates, thiazolididiones, statins, and/or n-3 PUFA; (3) suppression of inflammation by using Toll-like receptor (TLR) modulators or n-3 PUFA; and (4) suppression of oxidative stress by using vitamin E and other antioxidants( Reference Musso, Cassader and Rosina 66 Reference Shapiro, Tehilla and Attal-Singer 72 ). Therapeutic regulators of fibrosis, however, are less well-defined( Reference Cohen-Naftaly and Friedman 73 , Reference Schuppan and Kim 74 ).

Development of a mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

We have used wild type C57BL/6J mice and mice with global ablation of the LDL receptor (Ldlr−/−, on the C57BL/6J background) to study dietary factors and molecular mechanisms involved in the onset and progression of diet-induced chronic fatty liver diseases( Reference Depner, Torres-Gonzalez and Tripathy 49 , Reference Wang, Botolin and Christian 75 Reference Tripathy, Lytle and Stevens 80 ). We have assessed three diets for their capacity to promote a NASH phenotype that recapitulates human NASH: (1) the high fat diet (60 % energy as fat (Research Diets; D12492)) typically used to promote diet-induced obesity and type 2 diabetes( Reference Tripathy, Torres-Gonzalez and Jump 76 ); (2) a high fat–high cholesterol diet (Research Diets) used to induce fatty liver with elevated oxidative stress( Reference Depner, Torres-Gonzalez and Tripathy 49 , Reference Saraswathi, Gao and Morrow 81 ); and (3) the western diet (WD; Research Diets; D12079B) to induce NASH. The WD is moderately high in saturated and trans-fat (41 % total energy), sucrose (30 % total energy) and cholesterol (0·15 g%, w/w). Our studies established that the wild type mice developed hepatosteatosis and relatively mild hepatic inflammation and fibrosis when compared with WD-fed Ldlr−/− mice (Table 1). The combination of the WD and the Ldlr−/− mice yields a NASH- and MetS-like phenotype; a phenotype characterised by obesity, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, hepatosteatosis, hepatic inflammation, damage and fibrosis( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 ). Since human subjects( Reference Farrell and Larter 3 , Reference Cohen, Horton and Hobbs 4 , Reference Prashanth, Ganesh and Vima 14 ) and Ldlr−/− mice( Reference Depner, Torres-Gonzalez and Tripathy 49 , Reference Wang, Botolin and Christian 75 Reference Tripathy, Lytle and Stevens 80 , Reference Ganz, Bukong and Csak 82 ) develop NAFLD and NASH in a context of obesity and insulin resistance, Ldlr−/− mice may be a useful preclinical model to investigate the development, progression and remission of NASH under defined laboratory conditions.

Table 1. Comparison of mouse models of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis*

RD, reference diet (chow); HF, high fat diet; HFHC, high fat high cholesterol; WD, western diet; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Scd1, stearoyl CoA desaturase-1; Mcp1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; Col1A1, collagen 1A1.

* The wild type mice are C57BL/6J and the Ldlr−/− mice are on the C57BL/6J background.

The WD is similar to a fast-food based diet( Reference Charlton, Krishnan and Viker 83 ) and human diets linked to obesity in the USA( Reference Cordain, Eaton and Sebastian 84 , Reference Ishimoto, Lanaspa and Rivard 85 ). Both the WD and fast-food mouse models induced a NASH phenotype that recapitulates many of the phenotypic features of human NASH, including hepatic micro- and macro-steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, hepatic injury including infiltration of leucocytes (inflammation), oxidative stress and branching fibrosis( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 , Reference Ganz, Bukong and Csak 82 ). Moreover, NASH is associated with a major enrichment of both plasma and liver with SFA and MUFA and hepatic depletion of n-3 and n-6 PUFA( Reference Depner, Torres-Gonzalez and Tripathy 49 , Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 , Reference Depner and Traber 78 ), a phenomenon that has been described in human NASH( Reference Arendt, Comelli and Ma 86 , Reference Lee, Lambert and Hovhannisyan 87 ).

Rationale for using n-3 PUFA to prevent non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Our studies have assessed the capacity of C20–22 n-3 PUFA to prevent diet-induced NASH. C20–22 n-3 PUFA are pleiotropic regulators of cell function affecting membrane structure and multiple cellular regulatory mechanisms( Reference Jump, Tripathy and Depner 43 ). The impact of C20–22 n-3 PUFA on lipid metabolism and inflammation is well documented making these dietary fats an attractive nutritional approach to combat NASH( Reference Jump, Tripathy and Depner 43 ). Meta-analyses and other clinical studies suggest n-3 PUFA may lower liver fat in children and adults with NAFLD( Reference Nobili, Bedogni and Alisi 71 , Reference Sofi, Giangrandi and Cesari 88 Reference Kadiiska, Gladen and Baird 93 ). We identified 235 clinical trials( 94 ) assessing NASH and NASH therapies. Twenty-three of these trials used n-3 PUFA as a treatment strategy where diets were supplemented with fish oil or a combination of EPA and DHA; few studies used EPA or DHA alone. Thus, dietary C20–22 n-3 PUFA may have promise in reducing hepatic fat content in the NAFLD patient. These clinical studies, however, lack the capacity to assess the cellular, molecular and metabolic changes associated with NASH. As such, studies in mice may provide insight into the molecular and metabolic processes associated with the onset, progression and remission of NASH and thus fill critical gaps in the field of chronic fatty liver disease.

n-3 PUFA attenuate western diet-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in Ldlr−/− mice

We assessed the capacity of EPA and DHA to prevent NASH in Ldlr−/− mice( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 ). The dietary level of EPA or DHA was at approximately 2 % of total energy; olive oil was added to control diets to ensure all diets were isoenergetic. The concentration of C20–22 n-3 PUFA in the WD is comparable with the dose consumed by patients taking Lovaza (GSK) for treating dyslipidemia( Reference Barter and Ginsberg 95 ). Supplementing human diets with a DHA-enriched fish oil (6 g/d for 8 weeks) increased plasma DHA from 4 to 8 mol%( Reference Superko, Superko and Nasir 96 , Reference Lockyer, Tzanetou and Carvalho-Wells 97 ). Human subjects consuming EPA + DHA ethyl esters (4 g/d for 12 weeks) increased plasma EPA + DHA from 5·5 to 16·2 + 2·1 mol%( Reference Di Stasi, Bernasconi and Marchioli 98 ). In our studies, mice consuming DHA at 2 % total calories for 16 weeks increased plasma EPA, docosapentaenoic acid (DPA; 22 : 5, n-3) + DHA from 6·2 to 15·2 mol%. As such, our protocol for C20–22 n-3 PUFA supplementation yields a change in blood C20–22 n-3 PUFA comparable with that seen in human subjects consuming C20–22 n-3 PUFA at 4–6 g/d.

WD induces a robust NASH phenotype that recapitulates human NASH (Fig. 2)( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 ). Addition of EPA or DHA to the WD did not affect body weight, body fat or blood glucose, but the n-3 PUFA supplemented diets reduced WD-induced plasma lipids, hepatic lipids, inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 , Reference Depner and Traber 78 ). Moreover, these studies also established that DHA was equal or superior to EPA at attenuating all WD-induced NASH markers.

Fig. 2. (Colour online) Effects of the western diet (WD) and C20–22 n-3 PUFA on the prevention of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) Ldlr−/− mice. The effect of diet on NASH parameters was assessed( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 ). The comparison is between mice fed the reference diet (chow) v. the WD supplemented with olive oil, EPA or DHA. The effects are graded from minimal effect (+) to maximum effect (++++) of diet on specific parameters.

Feeding mice n-3 PUFA does not prevent western diet-induced endotoxinemia

Systemic inflammation is a major driver of NASH. Inflammatory signals contributing to NASH progression include: gut-derived microbial products (endotoxin, other bacterial toxins (Fig. 1)( Reference Harte, da Silva and Creely 30 , Reference Cani, Amar and Iglesias 99 ); oxidised-LDL( Reference Walenbergh, Koek and Bieghs 51 , Reference Schuppan and Kim 74 ), adipokines (leptin/adiponectin) and cytokines (TNFα)( Reference Leclercq, Farrell and Schriemer 100 ) and products from hepatocellular death( Reference Tilg and Moschen 23 , Reference Marra, Gastaldelli and Baroni 101 ). Feeding Ldlr−/− mice the WD leads to a 14-fold increase in plasma endotoxin. Including EPA or DHA in the WD did not prevent diet-induced endotoxinemia( Reference Depner and Traber 78 ). The appearance of bacterial lipids (endotoxin, a TLR-4 agonist)( Reference Akira and Takeda 102 ) in the plasma may represent a disturbance in gut physiology such as a change in microbial population, increased gut permeability (leaky gut), or simply co-transport of microbial lipids with chylomicron( Reference Harte, da Silva and Creely 30 , Reference Erridge, Attina and Spickett 103 , Reference Laugerette, Vors and Geloen 104 ). A link between the gut microbiome and NAFLD has been established( Reference Harte, da Silva and Creely 30 , Reference Goel, Gupta and Aggarwal 105 , Reference Henao-Mejia, Elinav and Jin 106 ).

n-3 PUFA attenuate hepatic inflammation

Analysis of the liver showed that including EPA or DHA in the WD attenuated WD-induced expression of multiple genes linked to inflammation including TLR(TLR-2, -4, -9) and TLR components (cluster of differentiation-14 (CD14); binds endotoxin), downstream targets of TLR; like NF-κB (p50 and P65 subunits) nuclear abundance, downstream targets of NF-κB (chemokines (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1)), inflammasome NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein (NLRP3) and hepatic expression of cytokines, e.g. TNFα and IL1β( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 , Reference Depner and Traber 78 ). As such, EPA and DHA attenuated WD-induced hepatic inflammation by down-regulating key cellular mediators of inflammation, including TLR, CD14 (CD14 mRNA and protein), NF-κB-p50 nuclear abundance.

n-3 PUFA have selective effects on hepatic oxidative stress

Hepatic oxidative stress is associated with NASH progression( Reference Adinolfi and Restivo 107 ). Feeding mice the WD increased hepatic expression of transcripts linked to oxidative stress, e.g. NADPH oxidase (NOX) subunits (Nox2, P22phox, P40phox and P67phox). The WD also induced the expression of nuclear factor-erythroid derived 2 (Nrf2), a key transcription factor involved in the anti-oxidant response pathway( Reference Depner, Torres-Gonzalez and Tripathy 49 , Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 ). Induction of Nrf2 was associated with increased expression of downstream targets of Nrf2 action, including hemeoxygenase-1 (Hmox1), glutathoine-S transferase-1 (Gst1α)( Reference Depner and Traber 78 ). Dietary n-3 PUFA had no effect on WD-mediated induction of hepatic Nrf2, Hmox1 or Gst1α. However, both EPA and DHA significantly attenuated WD-mediated induction of all NOX subunits( Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 ). Thus, EPA and DHA do not attenuate the Nrf2-regulated anti-oxidant pathway, but target the NOX pathway to lower hepatic oxidative stress.

n-3 PUFA attenuate hepatic fibrosis

Hepatic fibrosis develops as a result of hepatocellular death brought on by inflammation and oxidative stress. Key regulators of fibrosis include transforming growth factor β1, connective tissue growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, oxidative stress (NOX), inflammatory mediators (endotoxin, TLR agonist), leptin and Notch signalling( Reference Elinav, Ali and Bruck 34 , Reference Schuppan and Kim 74 , Reference Brenner, Seki and Taura 108 , Reference Bi and Kuang 109 ). While EPA and DHA supplementation attenuated WD-mediated induction of hepatic inflammation and oxidative stress, only DHA attenuated hepatic fibrosis. The anti-fibrotic effect of DHA was assessed by quantifying the expression of key markers of hepatic fibrosis, including the expression of collagen 1A1, tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and transforming growth factor β1; as well as trichrome staining of liver for fibrosis( Reference Depner, Torres-Gonzalez and Tripathy 49 , Reference Depner, Philbrick and Jump 77 ). These studies reveal an important difference in the capacity of EPA and DHA to attenuate NASH-associated hepatosteatosis, inflammation, oxidative stress and fibrosis.

The western diet and n-3 PUFA affect all major hepatic metabolic pathways

To gain additional insight into NASH, we used a global non-targeted metabolomic approach to examine the impact of the WD and C20–22 n-3 PUFA on hepatic metabolism. The analysis identified 320 known biochemicals( Reference Depner and Traber 78 ). Both the WD and C20–22 n-3 PUFA significantly affected the hepatic abundance of metabolites in all major metabolic pathways including amino acids and peptides, carbohydrate and energy, lipid, nucleotide and vitamins and cofactors. Fig. 3 illustrates the impact of diet on hepatic biochemicals associated with lipid, carbohydrate, amino acid and vitamin and cofactor metabolism. In each of the four pathways examined, at least 50 % of the biochemicals was affected by the WD. The WD either increased or decreased the hepatic abundance of these metabolites. A closer examination of lipid metabolites shows that WD feeding increased forty-three of 136 lipid metabolites, while inclusion of DHA in the WD attenuated the induction of 72 % of the forty-three metabolites. The WD also lowered hepatic levels of thirty-one lipids; DHA attenuated the WD effect on 87 % of the thirty-one lipid metabolites. Similar effects were seen with carbohydrates, amino acids, vitamins and cofactors.

Fig. 3. Effects of the western diet (WD) and C20–22 n-3 PUFA on hepatic metabolites. A non-targeted metabolomic analysis was carried out as described( Reference Depner and Traber 78 ). The pie plots represent the effects of diet on the total number of identified lipids (136 biochemicals), carbohydrates (34 biochemicals), amino acids (78 biochemicals) and vitamins and cofactors (16 biochemicals). Hepatic levels of some biochemicals were not affected by diet (No Change, grey); some were increased by the WD (red) and some were decreased by the WD (green). The top number in the fraction represents the total number of biochemicals increased or decreased by the WD. The bottom number is the percentage of the WD affected biochemicals that were attenuated by including DHA in the WD.

Overall, the metabolomic analysis expanded our understanding of the impact of the WD and DHA on hepatic metabolism. The onset of NASH is associated with major changes in overall hepatic metabolism and dietary DHA supplementation was able to reverse many of these WD-induced effects on hepatic metabolism. In addition to the pathways listed earlier, our analysis identified several key metabolites (oxidised lipids, advanced glycation end products, sphingolipids) that were regulated by WD and n-3 PUFA. Future studies will focus on evaluating the role these metabolites play in NASH progression and remission.

Summary

NAFLD and its progression to NASH is a major public health concern. To help better understand the molecular and metabolic basis for the disease process, we developed a mouse model of NASH. The WD induces a robust NASH phenotype in Ldlr−/− mice that recapitulates human NASH. Addition of DHA to the WD attenuates NASH development without promoting weight loss or a reduction in body fat. While EPA and DHA did not attenuate WD-induced markers of systemic inflammation (endotoxin), dietary n-3 PUFA attenuated WD-induced hepatic inflammation by targeting key mediators of hepatic inflammation; specifically a key transcriptional mediator of inflammation (NF-κB-p50) and several downstream NF-κB targets, e.g. TLR receptors (TLR-2, -4, -9) and cofactors (CD14) and inflammasome components (NLRP3). The WD induced several oxidative stress pathways (Nrf2, Nrf2-regulated pathways and NOX-subtype). DHA attenuated the NOX-pathway while preserving the Nrf2-regulated anti-oxidant pathway. Finally, dietary DHA, but not EPA, attenuated WD-induced hepatic fibrosis. Together, these findings suggest that DHA may have potential for use as a therapeutic agent to treat human NASH.

Financial Support

This work was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant (2009-65200-05846) and the National Institutes of Health grants (DK 43220 & DK094600).

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Authorship

All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.

References

1. Centers for Disease Control (2015) Adult obesity facts.http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html (accessed April 2015).Google Scholar
2. Centers for Disease Control (2015) Childhood obesity facts. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html (accessed April 2015).Google Scholar
3. Farrell, GC & Larter, CZ (2006) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology 43, S99S112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Cohen, JC, Horton, JD & Hobbs, HH (2011) Human fatty liver disease: old questions and new insights. Science 332, 15191523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bellentani, S, Scaglioni, F, Marino, M et al. (2010) Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis 28, 155161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Angulo, P & Lindor, KD (2002) Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17, Suppl., S186S190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Neuschwander-Tetri, BA & Caldwell, SH (2003) Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: summary of an AASLD single topic conference. Hepatology 37, 12021219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Kim, CH & Younossi, ZM (2008) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a manifestation of the metabolic syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med 75, 721728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Alberti, KG, Zimmet, P & Shaw, J (2005) The metabolic syndrome–a new worldwide definition. Lancet 366, 10591062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Vernon, G, Baranova, A & Younossi, ZM (2011) Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34, 274285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Angulo, P (2002) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 346, 12211231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Chalasani, N, Younossi, Z, Lavine, JE et al. (2012) The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 142, 15921609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McCullough, AJ (2006) Pathophysiology of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 40, Suppl. 1, S17S29.Google Scholar
14. Prashanth, M, Ganesh, HK, Vima, MV et al. (2009) Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Physicians India 57, 205210.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Soderberg, C, Stal, P, Askling, J et al. (2010) Decreased survival of subjects with elevated liver function tests during a 28-year follow-up. Hepatology 51, 595602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Ekstedt, M, Franzen, LE, Mathiesen, UL et al. (2006) Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology 44, 865873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Adams, LA, Lymp, JF, St Sauver, J et al. (2005) The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology 129, 113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. McCullough, AJ (2004) The clinical features, diagnosis and natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 8, 521533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. McCollough, AJ (2011) Epidemiology of the metabolic syndrome in the USA. J Dig Dis 12, 333340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Leslie, M (2015) The liver's weight problem. Science 1820.Google Scholar
21. Day, CP & James, OF (1998) Steatohepatitis: a tale of two “hits”? Gastroenterology 114, 842845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. LaBrecque, D, Abbas, Z, Anania, F et al. (2012) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World Gastroenterol Org Global Guidelines 129.Google ScholarPubMed
23. Tilg, H & Moschen, AR (2010) Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology 52, 18361846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Hashimoto, E, Tokushige, K & Farrell, GC (2011) Histological features of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: what is important? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27, 57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Friedman, SL (2008) Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology 134, 16551669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Abdelmalek, MF, Suzuki, A, Guy, C et al. (2010) Increased fructose consumption is associated with fibrosis severity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 51, 19611971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Guturu, P & Duchini, A (2012) Etiopathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: role of obesity, insulin resistance and mechanisms of hepatotoxicity. Int J Hepatol 2012, 212865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Wouters, K, van Gorp, PJ, Bieghs, V et al. (2008) Dietary cholesterol, rather than liver steatosis, leads to hepatic inflammation in hyperlipidemic mouse models of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 48, 474486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Pagadala, M, Kasumov, T, McCullough, AJ et al. (2012) Role of ceramides in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23, 365371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Harte, AL, da Silva, NF, Creely, SJ et al. (2010) Elevated endotoxin levels in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Inflammation 7, 15. PubMed.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Hooper, AJ, Adams, LA & Burnett, JR (2011) Genetic determinants of hepatic steatosis in man. J Lipid Res 52, 593617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Bieghs, V, Van Gorp, PJ, Wouters, K et al. (2012) LDL receptor knock-out mice are a physiological model particularly vulnerable to study the onset of inflammation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS ONE 7, e30668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Joyce, SA, MacSharry, J, Casey, PG et al. (2014) Regulation of host weight gain and lipid metabolism by bacterial bile acid modification in the gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 74217426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Elinav, E, Ali, M, Bruck, R et al. (2009) Competitive in hibition of leptin signaling results in amelioration of liver fibrosis through modulation of stellate cell function. Hepatology 49, 278286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Donnelly, KL, Smith, CI, Schwarzenberg, SJ et al. (2005) Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 115, 13431351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Matherly, SC & Puri, P (2012) Mechanisms of simple hepatic steatosis: not so simple after all. Clin Liver Dis 16, 505524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Toshimitsu, K, Matsuura, B, Ohkubo, I et al. (2007) Dietary habits and nutrient intake in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Nutrition 23, 4652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Musso, G, Gambino, R, De Michieli, F et al. (2003) Dietary habits and their relations to insulin resistance and postprandial lipemia in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 37, 909916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Capanni, M, Calella, F, Biagini, MR et al. (2006) Prolonged n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation ameliorates hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23, 11431151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Cortez-Pinto, H, Jesus, L, Barros, H et al. (2006) How different is the dietary pattern in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients? Clin Nutr 25, 816823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Levy, JR, Clore, JN & Stevens, W (2004) Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids decrease hepatic triglycerides in Fischer 344 rats. Hepatology 39, 608616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Pachikian, BD, Essaghir, A, Demoulin, JB et al. . Hepatic n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid depletion promotes steatosis and insulin resistance in mice: genomic analysis of cellular targets. PLoS ONE 6, e23365.Google Scholar
43. Jump, DB, Tripathy, S & Depner, CM (2013) Fatty acid-regulated transcription factors in the liver. Annu Rev Nutr 33, 249269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Zelber-Sagi, S, Ratziu, V & Oren, R (2011) Nutrition and physical activity in NAFLD: an overview of the epidemiological evidence. World J Gastroenterol 17, 33773389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Tetri, LH, Basaranoglu, M, Brunt, EM et al. (2008) Severe NAFLD with hepatic necroinflammatory changes in mice fed trans fats and a high-fructose corn syrup equivalent. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 295, G987G995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Lottenberg, AM, Afonso Mda, S, Lavrador, MS et al. (2012) The role of dietary fatty acids in the pathology of metabolic syndrome. J Nutr Biochem 23, 10271040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Wouters, K, van Bilsen, M, van Gorp, PJ et al. (2010) Intrahepatic cholesterol influences progression, inhibition and reversal of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in hyperlipidemic mice. FEBS Lett 584, 10011005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Teratani, T, Tomita, K, Suzuki, T et al. (2012) A high-cholesterol diet exacerbates liver fibrosis in mice via accumulation of free cholesterol in hepatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology 142, 152164 e10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Depner, CM, Torres-Gonzalez, M, Tripathy, S et al. (2012) Menhaden oil decreases high-fat diet-induced markers of hepatic damage, steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in obese Ldlr-/- mice. J Nutr 142, 14951503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Yasutake, K, Nakamuta, M, Shima, Y et al. (2009) Nutritional investigation of non-obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the significance of dietary cholesterol. Scand J Gastroenterol 44, 471477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Walenbergh, SMA, Koek, GH, Bieghs, V et al. (2013) Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: the role of oxidized low-density lipoproteins. J Hepatol 58, 801820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Marriott, BP, Olsho, L, Hadden, L et al. (2010) Intake of added sugars in the United States: what is the measure? Am J Clin Nutr 94, 16521653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Chun, OK, Chung, CE, Wang, Y et al. (2010) Changes in intakes of total and added sugar and their contribution to energy intake in the U.S. Nutrients 2, 834854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Chanmugam, P, Guthrie, JF, Cecilio, S et al. (2003) Did fat intake in the United States really decline between 1989–1991 and 1994–1996? J Am Diet Assoc 103, 867872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Lee, S, Harnack, L, Jacobs, DR Jr et al. (2007) Trends in diet quality for coronary heart disease prevention between 1980–1982 and 2000–2002: the Minnesota Heart Survey. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 213222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Marriott, BP, Olsho, L, Hadden, L et al. (2010) Intake of added sugars and selected nutrients in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 50, 228258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Vos, MB, Kimmons, JE, Gillespie, C et al. (2008) Dietary fructose consumption among US children and adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Medscape J Med 10, 160.Google ScholarPubMed
58. Lim, JS, Mietus-Snyder, M, Valente, A et al. (2010) The role of fructose in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7, 251264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Bizeau, ME & Pagliassotti, MJ (2005) Hepatic adaptations to sucrose and fructose. Metabolism 54, 11891201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60. Leclercq, IA, Field, J, Enriquez, A et al. (2000) Constitutive and inducible expression of hepatic CYP2E1 in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 268, 337344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Schalkwijk, CG, Stehouwer, CD & van Hinsbergh, VW (2004) Fructose-mediated non-enzymatic glycation: sweet coupling or bad modification. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 20, 369382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62. Bunn, HF & Higgins, PJ (1981) Reaction of monosaccharides with proteins: possible evolutionary significance. Science 213, 222224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63. Bose, T & Chakraborti, AS (2008) Fructose-induced structural and functional modifications of hemoglobin: implication for oxidative stress in diabetes mellitus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1780, 800808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Wei, Y, Wang, D, Moran, G et al. (2013) Fructose-induced stress signaling in the liver involves methylglyoxal. Nutr Meta (Lond) 10, 3238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65. Chan, HL, de Silva, HJ, Leung, NW et al. (2007) How should we manage patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in 2007? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22, 801808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Musso, G, Cassader, M, Rosina, F et al. (2012) Impact of current treatments on liver disease, glucose metabolism and cardiovascular risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Diabetologia 55, 885904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67. Petit, JM, Guiu, B, Duvillard, L et al. (2012) Increased erythrocytes n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids is significantly associated with a lower prevalence of steatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Nutr 31, 520525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Zheng, JS, Xu, A, Huang, T et al. (2012) Low docosahexaenoic acid content in plasma phospholipids is associated with increased non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in China. Lipids 47, 549556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69. Parker, HM, Johnson, NA, Burdon, CA et al. (2012) Omega-3 supplementation and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol 56, 944951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70. Di Minno, MN, Russolillo, A, Lupoli, R et al. (2012) Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 18, 58395847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71. Nobili, V, Bedogni, G, Alisi, A et al. (2011) Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation decreases liver fat content in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial. Arch Dis Child 96, 350353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. Shapiro, H, Tehilla, M, Attal-Singer, J et al. (2011) The therapeutic potential of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Nutr 30, 619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73. Cohen-Naftaly, M & Friedman, SL (2011) Current status of novel antifibrotic thearpies in patients with chronic liver disease. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 4, 391417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74. Schuppan, D & Kim, YO (2013) Evolving therapies for liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest 123, 18871901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. Wang, Y, Botolin, D, Christian, B et al. (2005) Tissue-specific, nutritional, and developmental regulation of rat fatty acid elongases. J Lipid Res 46, 706715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76. Tripathy, S, Torres-Gonzalez, M & Jump, DB (2010) Elevated hepatic fatty acid elongase-5 activity corrects dietary fat-induced hyperglycemia in obese C57BL/6J mice. J Lipid Res 51, 26422654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77. Depner, CM, Philbrick, KA & Jump, DB (2013) Docosahexaenoic acid attenuates hepatic inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis without decreasing hepatosteatosis in a Ldlr(-/-) mouse model of western diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Nutr 143, 315323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78. Depner, CM, Traber, MG, Bobe G et al. (2013) A metabolomic analysis of omega-3 fatty acid mediated attenuation of western diet-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in LDLR-/- mice. Plos ONE 8, e83756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79. Tripathy, S & Jump, DB (2013) Elovl5 regulates the mTORC2-Akt-FOXO1 pathway by controlling hepatic cis-Vaccenic acid synthesis in diet-induced obese mice. J Lipid Res 54, 7184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80. Tripathy, S, Lytle, KA, Stevens, RD et al. (2014) Fatty acid elongase-5 (Elovl5) regulates hepatic triglyceride catabolism in obese C57BL/6J mice. J Lipid Res 55, 14481464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81. Saraswathi, V, Gao, L, Morrow, JD et al. (2007) Fish oil increases cholesterol storage in white adipose tissue with concomitant decreases in inflammation, hepatic steatosis, and atherosclerosis in mice. J Nutr 137, 17761782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82. Ganz, M, Bukong, TN, Csak, T et al. (2015) Progression of non-alcoholic steatosis to steatohepatitis and fibrosis parallels cumulative accumulation of danger signals that promote inflammation and liver tumors in a high fat-cholesterol-sugar diet model in mice. J Transl Med 13, 193207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. Charlton, M, Krishnan, A, Viker, K et al. (2011) Fast food diet mouse: novel small animal model of NASH with balloning, progressive fibrosis and high physiological facelity to the human condition. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 301, G825GG34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84. Cordain, L, Eaton, SB, Sebastian, A et al. (2005) Orgins and evolution of the western diet: health implications for the 21st century. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 341354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85. Ishimoto, T, Lanaspa, MA, Rivard, CJ et al. (2013) High-fat and high-sucrose (western) diet induces steatohepatitis that is dependent on fructokinase. Hepatology 58, 16321643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86. Arendt, BM, Comelli, EM, Ma, DW et al. (2015) Altered hepatic gene expression in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with lower n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Hepatology 61, 15651578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87. Lee, JJ, Lambert, JE, Hovhannisyan, Y et al. (2015) Palmitoleic acid is elevated in fatty liver disease and reflects hepatic lipogenesis. Am J Clin Nutr 101, 3443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88. Sofi, F, Giangrandi, I, Cesari, F et al. (2011) Effects of a 1-year dietary intervention with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid-enriched olive oil on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients: a preliminary study. Int J Food Sci Nutr 61, 792802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89. Bulchandani, DG, Nachnani, JS, Nookala, A et al. (2011) Treatment with omega-3 fatty acids but not exendin-4 improves hepatic steatosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22, 12451252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
90. Ishikawa, Y, Yokoyama, M, Saito, Y et al. (2011) Preventive effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on coronary artery disease in patients with peripheral artery disease. Circ J 74, 14511457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91. Kishino, T, Ohnishi, H, Ohtsuka, K et al. (2011) Low concentrations of serum n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with liver injury. Clin Chem Lab Med 49, 159162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92. Scorletti, E, Bhatia, L, McCormick, KG et al. (2014) Effects of purified eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: results from the *WELCOME study. Hepatology 60, 12111221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93. Kadiiska, MB, Gladen, BC, Baird, DD et al. (2005) Biomarkers of oxidative stress study II: are oxidation products of lipids, proteins, and DNA markers of CCl4 poisoning? Free Radic Biol Med 38, 698710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94. US National Institute of health (2015) NAFLD, NASH and omega-3 fatty acids. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. (accessed April 2015).Google Scholar
95. Barter, P & Ginsberg, HN (2008) Effectiveness of combined statin plus omega-3 fatty acid therapy for mixed dyslipidemia. Am J Cardiol 102, 10401045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
96. Superko, HR, Superko, SM, Nasir, K et al. (2013) Omega-3 fatty acid blood levels. Clinical significance and controversy. Circulation 128, 21542161.Google ScholarPubMed
97. Lockyer, S, Tzanetou, M, Carvalho-Wells, AL et al. (2012) STAT gene dietary model to implement diets of differing fat composition in prospectively genotyped groups (apoE) using commercially available foods. Br J Nutr 108, 17051713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98. Di Stasi, D, Bernasconi, R, Marchioli, R et al. (2004) Early modification of fatty acid composition in plasma phospholipids, platelets and mononucleates of healthy volunteers after low doses of n-3 PUFA. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60, 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99. Cani, PD, Amar, J, Iglesias, MA et al. (2007) Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 56, 17611772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
100. Leclercq, IA, Farrell, GC, Schriemer, R et al. (2002) Leptin is essential for the hepatic fibrogenic response to chronic liver injury. J Hepatol 37, 206213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
101. Marra, F, Gastaldelli, A, Baroni, GS et al. (2008) Molecular basis and mechanisms of progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Trends Mol Med 14, 7281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102. Akira, S & Takeda, K (2004) Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 4, 499511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
103. Erridge, C, Attina, T, Spickett, CM et al. (2007) A high-fat meal induces low-grade endotoxemia: evidence of a novel mechanism of postprandial inflammation. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 12861292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
104. Laugerette, F, Vors, C, Geloen, A et al. (2011) Emulsified lipids increase endotoxemia: possible role in early postprandial low-grade inflammation. J Nutritional Biochem 22, 5359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
105. Goel, A, Gupta, M & Aggarwal, R (2014) Gut microbiota and liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 29, 11391148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
106. Henao-Mejia, J, Elinav, E, Jin, C et al. (2012) Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature 482, 179185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107. Adinolfi, LE & Restivo, L (2011) Does vitamin E cure nonalcoholic steatohepatitis? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5, 147150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
108. Brenner, DA, Seki, E, Taura, K et al. (2011) Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-induced fibrosis: toll-like receptors, reactive oxygen species and Jun N-terminal kinase. Hepatol Res 41, 683686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109. Bi, P & Kuang, S (2015) Notch signaling as a novel regulator of metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metabol 26, 248255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Factors contributing to the onset and progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison of mouse models of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis*

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (Colour online) Effects of the western diet (WD) and C20–22n-3 PUFA on the prevention of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) Ldlr−/− mice. The effect of diet on NASH parameters was assessed(77). The comparison is between mice fed the reference diet (chow) v. the WD supplemented with olive oil, EPA or DHA. The effects are graded from minimal effect (+) to maximum effect (++++) of diet on specific parameters.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Effects of the western diet (WD) and C20–22n-3 PUFA on hepatic metabolites. A non-targeted metabolomic analysis was carried out as described(78). The pie plots represent the effects of diet on the total number of identified lipids (136 biochemicals), carbohydrates (34 biochemicals), amino acids (78 biochemicals) and vitamins and cofactors (16 biochemicals). Hepatic levels of some biochemicals were not affected by diet (No Change, grey); some were increased by the WD (red) and some were decreased by the WD (green). The top number in the fraction represents the total number of biochemicals increased or decreased by the WD. The bottom number is the percentage of the WD affected biochemicals that were attenuated by including DHA in the WD.

You have Access
24
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Impact of dietary fat on the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Ldlr−/− mice
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Impact of dietary fat on the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Ldlr−/− mice
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Impact of dietary fat on the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Ldlr−/− mice
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *