Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 32
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Chong, Esther Swee Lan 2014. A potential role of probiotics in colorectal cancer prevention: review of possible mechanisms of action. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 351.


    Nugent, A. P. 2005. Health properties of resistant starch. Nutrition Bulletin, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 27.


    Yeo, Siok-Koon and Liong, Min-Tze 2010. Effect of prebiotics on viability and growth characteristics of probiotics in soymilk. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 90, Issue. 2, p. 267.


    Mallo, J.J. Rioperez, J. and Honrubia, P. 2010. The addition of Enterococcus faecium to diet improves piglet's intestinal microbiota and performance. Livestock Science, Vol. 133, Issue. 1-3, p. 176.


    Miyamoto, H. Seta, M. Horiuchi, S. Iwasawa, Y. Naito, T. Nishida, A. Miyamoto, H. Matsushita, T. Itoh, K. and Kodama, H. 2013. Potential probiotic thermophiles isolated from mice after compost ingestion. Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 114, Issue. 4, p. 1147.


    Mori, Kenichi Ito, Toshiyuki Miyamoto, Hirokuni Ozawa, Masayo Wada, Shinji Kumagai, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Jiro Naito, Rie Nakamura, Shogo Kodama, Hiroaki and Kurihara, Yuriko 2011. Oral administration of multispecies microbial supplements to sows influences the composition of gut microbiota and fecal organic acids in their post-weaned piglets. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Vol. 112, Issue. 2, p. 145.


    Papadimitriou, Konstantinos Zoumpopoulou, Georgia Foligné, Benoit Alexandraki, Voula Kazou, Maria Pot, Bruno and Tsakalidou, Effie 2015. Discovering probiotic microorganisms: in vitro, in vivo, genetic and omics approaches. Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 6,


    Scharek-Tedin, Lydia Filter, Matthias Taras, David Wrede, Paul and Schmidt, Michael F.G. 2009. Influence of anEnterococcus faeciumprobiotic on the development of Peyer's patches B cells in piglets. Archives of Animal Nutrition, Vol. 63, Issue. 5, p. 343.


    Commane, Daniel M. Shortt, Colette T. Silvi, Stefania Cresci, Albert Hughes, Roisin M. and Rowland, Ian R. 2005. Effects of Fermentation Products of Pro- and Prebiotics on Trans-Epithelial Electrical Resistance in an In Vitro Model of the Colon. Nutrition and Cancer, Vol. 51, Issue. 1, p. 102.


    Faghfoori, Zeinab Pourghassem Gargari, Bahram Saber Gharamaleki, Amir Bagherpour, Hassan and Yari Khosroushahi, Ahmad 2015. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of probiotics effects on colorectal cancer. Journal of Functional Foods, Vol. 18, p. 463.


    KOBAYASHI, Yasuo ITOH, Aya MIYAWAKI, Kanae KOIKE, Satoshi IWABUCHI, Osamu IIMURA, Yuji KOBASHI, Yuri KAWASHIMA, Tomoyuki WAKAMATSU, Junichi HATTORI, Akihito MURAKAMI, Hiroshi MORIMATSU, Fumiki NAKAEBISU, Takashi and HISHINUMA, Takeshi 2011. Effect of liquid whey feeding on fecal microbiota of mature and growing pigs. Animal Science Journal, Vol. 82, Issue. 4, p. 607.


    SATO, Hiroshi and NAKAJIMA, Junko 2005. Fecal ammonia, urea, volatile fatty acid and lactate levels in dairy cows and their pathophysiological significance during diarrhea. Animal Science Journal, Vol. 76, Issue. 6, p. 595.


    De Preter, Vicky Hamer, Henrike M Windey, Karen and Verbeke, Kristin 2011. The impact of pre- and/or probiotics on human colonic metabolism: Does it affect human health?. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 46.


    Kato, K. Mizuno, S. Umesaki, Y. Ishii, Y. Sugitani, M. Imaoka, A. Otsuka, M. Hasunuma, O. Kurihara, R. Iwasaki, A. and Arakawa, Y. 2004. Randomized placebo-controlled trial assessing the effect of bifidobacteria-fermented milk on active ulcerative colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 20, Issue. 10, p. 1133.


    Ushakova, N. A. Nekrasov, R. V. Pravdin, I. V. Sverchkova, N. V. Kolomiyets, E. I. and Pavlov, D. S. 2015. Mechanisms of the effects of probiotics on symbiotic digestion. Biology Bulletin, Vol. 42, Issue. 5, p. 394.


    Commane, Daniel Hughes, Roisin Shortt, Colette and Rowland, Ian 2005. The potential mechanisms involved in the anti-carcinogenic action of probiotics. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, Vol. 591, Issue. 1-2, p. 276.


    Loh, Teck Chwen Thu, Tran Van Foo, Hooi Ling and Bejo, Mohd Hair 2013. Effects of different levels of metabolite combination produced byLactobacillus plantarumon growth performance, diarrhoea, gut environment and digestibility of postweaning piglets. Journal of Applied Animal Research, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 200.


    Piccione, Giuseppe Grasso, Fortunata Fazio, Francesco Assenza, Anna and Caola, Giovanni 2007. Influence of different schedules of feeding on daily rhythms of blood urea and ammonia concentration in cows. Biological Rhythm Research, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 133.


    Corfe, Bernard M Williams, Elizabeth A Bury, Jonathan P Riley, Stuart A Croucher, Lisa J Lai, Daphne YL and Evans, Caroline A 2009. A study protocol to investigate the relationship between dietary fibre intake and fermentation, colon cell turnover, global protein acetylation and early carcinogenesis: the FACT study. BMC Cancer, Vol. 9, Issue. 1,


    Li, Fengyuan Duan, Kangmin Wang, Cuiling McClain, Craig and Feng, Wenke 2016. Probiotics and Alcoholic Liver Disease: Treatment and Potential Mechanisms. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, Vol. 2016, p. 1.


    ×

Influences of probiotic bacteria on organic acid production by pig caecal bacteria in vitro

  • Takashi Sakata (a1), Taichi Kojima (a1), Masatoshi Fujieda (a1), Masanori Takahashi (a1) and Takashi Michibata (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/PNS2002211
  • Published online: 05 March 2007
Abstract

The mechanism of action of probiotics is largely unknown. A potential mechanism should be to increase the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), known modulators of gut functions, by the bacterial ecosystem in the large intestine. The present paper reviews our recent studies in which the capacity of probiotic bacteria to increase the production of SCFA by pig caecal bacteria was investigated using batch-culture and continuous-culture techniques. All four commercial probiotic preparations and three strains of probiotic bacteria dose-dependently accelerated the net production of SCFA, succinic acid and lactic acid without changing the acid profile, and slowed the net production of NH4. Effects on organic acid production did not vary among different probiotic species. Neither probiotic preparations nor probiotic bacteria affected the organic acid production from glucose, gastric mucin, starch or lactose, or organic acids produced:added saccharide. Glucose abolished these effects of probiotic preparations. However, the capacity of probiotics to increase SCFA production was not modified by gastric mucin, starch or lactose. These results indicate that probiotic bacteria increase SCFA production by accelerating the breakdown of carbohydrates that are resistant to indigenous bacteria, and suggest that the concept of prebiotics in terms of SCFA production as a measure of probiotic function is arguable.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Influences of probiotic bacteria on organic acid production by pig caecal bacteria in vitro
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Influences of probiotic bacteria on organic acid production by pig caecal bacteria in vitro
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Influences of probiotic bacteria on organic acid production by pig caecal bacteria in vitro
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Professor Takashi Sakata, fax +81 225 22 7746, sakata@isenshu-u.ac.jp
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


S Bengmark , B Jeppsson (1995) Gastrointestinal surface protection and mucosa reconditioning. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 19, 410415.

GPA Bongaerts (2001) The beneficial, antimicrobial effect of probiotics. Medical Hypotheses 56, 174177.


M Fujieda , T Sakata (2002) Glucose but not polypeptone reduces the effect of probiotic preparations to stimulate carbohydrate breakdown and reduce net ammonia production by pig cecal bacteria in vitro. Journal of Medicinal Food 4, 231240.

R Fuller (1991) Probiotics in human medicine. Gut 32, 439442.

I Ito , T Hayashi , A Iguchi , H Endo , M Nakao , S Kato , T Nabeshima , Y Ogura (1997) Effects of administration of Clostridium butyricum to patients receiving long-term tube feeding. Japanese Journal of Geriatrics 34, 298304.

H Kikuchi , T Sakata (1992) Qualitative and quantitative estimation of soluble indigestible polysaccharides as substrates for hindgut fermentation by mini-scale batch culture. Journal of Nutritional Sciences and Vitaminology 38, 287296.

H Kiriyama , Y Hariu , T Sakata (1992) Comparison of in vitro productivities of short-chain fatty acids and gases from aldoses and the corresponding alcohols by pig cecal bacteria. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 3, 447451.



E Pouteau , P Nguyen , O Ballèvre & Krempf (2003) Production rates and metabolism of short-chain fatty acids in the colon and whole body using stable isotopes. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62, 8793.

T Sakata , T Kojima , M Fujieda , M Miyakozawa , M Takahashi , K Ushida (1999) Probiotic preparations dose-dependently increase net production rates of organic acids and decrease that of ammonia by pig cecal bacteria in batch culture. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 44, 14851493.

U Siigur , E Tamm , S Torm , I Lutsar , S Salminen , T Midtvedt (1996) Effect of bacterial infection and administration of a probiotic on faecal short-chain fatty acids. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 9, 271277.

W von Engelhardt , J Bartels , S Kirschberger , Zu Meyer , H Düttingdorf , R Busche (1998) Role of short-chain fatty acids in the hind gut. Veterinary Quarterly 20, S52S59.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: