Skip to main content
×
Home

Uses of nutrient profiling to address public health needs: from regulation to reformulation

  • Adam Drewnowski (a1)
Abstract

Nutrient profiling (NP) models rate the nutritional quality of individual foods, based on their nutrient composition. Their goal is to identify nutrient-rich foods, generally defined as those that contain more nutrients than calories and are low in fat, sugar and salt. NP models have provided the scientific basis for evaluating nutrition and health claims and regulating marketing and advertising to children. The food industry has used NP methods to reformulate product portfolios. To help define what we mean by healthy foods, NP models need to be based on published nutrition standards, mandated serving sizes and open-source nutrient composition databases. Specifically, the development and testing of NP models for public health should follow the seven decision steps outlined by the European Food Safety Authority. Consistent with this scheme, the nutrient-rich food (NRF) family of indices was based on a variable number of qualifying nutrients (from six to fifteen) and on three disqualifying nutrients (saturated fat, added sugar, sodium). The selection of nutrients and daily reference amounts followed nutrient standards for the USA. The base of calculation was 418·4 kJ (100 kcal), in preference to 100 g, or serving sizes. The NRF algorithms, based on unweighted sums of percent daily values, subtracted negative (LIM) from positive (NRn) subscores (NRn – LIM). NRF model performance was tested with respect to energy density and independent measures of a healthy diet. Whereas past uses of NP modelling have been regulatory or educational, voluntary product reformulation by the food industry may have most impact on public health.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: A. Drewnowski, fax (206) 685-1696, email adamdrew@u.washington.edu
References
Hide All
1. Drewnowski A & Fulgoni VL III (2014) Nutrient density: principles and evaluation tools. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 1223s1228s.
2. Nicklas TA, Drewnowski A & O'Neil CE (2014) The nutrient density approach to healthy eating: challenges and opportunities. Public Health Nutr 17, 26262636.
3. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2006) Regulation (EC) no 1924/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Off J Eur Union L 404, 925.
4. Maschkowski G, Hartmann M & Hoffmann J (2014) Health-related on-pack communication and nutritional value of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals evaluated against five nutrient profiling schemes. BMC Public Health 14, 1178.
5. Mhurchu CN, Mackenzie T & Vandevijvere S (2016) Protecting New Zealand children from exposure to the marketing of unhealthy foods and drinks: a comparison of three nutrient profiling systems to classify foods. N Z Med J 129, 4153.
6. Royo-Bordonada MA, Leon-Flandez K, Damian J et al. (2016) The extent and nature of food advertising to children on Spanish television in 2012 using an international food-based coding system and the UK nutrient profiling model. Public Health 137, 8894.
7. Pan American Health Organization (2016). Pan American health organization nutrient profile model. http://iris.Paho.Org/xmlui/handle/123456789/18621 (accessed January 2017 ).
9. Batis C, Rivera JA, Popkin BM et al. (2016) First-year evaluation of Mexico's tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: an observational study. PLoS Med 13, e1002057.
10. Darmon N, Darmon M, Maillot M et al. (2005) A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 18811887.
11. Vlassopoulos A, Masset G, Leroy F et al. (2017) A nutrient profiling system for the (re)formulation of a global food & beverage portfolio. Eur J Nutr 56, 11051122.
12. Masset G, Mathias KC, Vlassopoulos A et al. (2016) Modeled dietary impact of pizza reformulations in US children and adolescents. PLoS ONE 11, e0164197.
13. Vlassopoulos A, Masset G, Charles VR et al. (2017) A nutrient profiling system for the (re)formulation of a global food and beverage portfolio. Eur J Nutr 56, 11051122.
15. Drewnowski A & Fulgoni V (2008) Nutrient profiling of foods: creating a nutrient-rich food index. Nutr rev 66, 2339.
16. Drewnowski A. (2009) Defining nutrient density: development and validation of the nutrient rich foods index. J Am Coll Nutr 28, 421s426s.
17. Drewnowski A, Maillot M & Darmon N (2009) Testing nutrient profile models in relation to energy density and energy cost. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 674683.
18. Drewnowski A (2005) Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 721732.
19. Fern EB, Watzke H, Barclay DV et al. (2015) The nutrient balance concept: a new quality metric for composite meals and diets. PLoS ONE 10, e0130491.
20. Drewnowski A, Maillot M & Darmon N (2009) Should nutrient profiles be based on 100 g, 100 kcal or serving size? Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 898904.
21. Maillot M, Darmon N, Darmon M et al. (2007) Nutrient-dense food groups have high energy costs: an econometric approach to nutrient profiling. J Nutr 137, 18151820.
22. Azais-Braesco V, Goffi C & Labouze E (2006) Nutrient profiling: comparison and critical analysis of existing systems. Public Health Nutr 9, 613622.
23. Labouze E, Goffi C, Moulay L et al. (2007) A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: nutrimap. Public Health Nutr 10, 690700.
24. Scarborough P, Boxer A, Rayner M et al. (2007) Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals. Public Health Nutr 10, 337345.
25. Arambepola C, Scarborough P & Rayner M (2008) Validating a nutrient profile model. Public Health Nutr 11, 371378.
26. Darmon N, Vieux F, Maillot M et al. (2009) Nutrient profiles discriminate between foods according to their contribution to nutritionally adequate diets: a validation study using linear programming and the SAIN,LIM system. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 12271236.
27. Francou A, Hebel P, Braesco V et al. (2015) Consumption patterns of fruit and vegetable juices and dietary nutrient density among French children and adults. Nutrients 7, 60736087.
28. Sluik D, Streppel MT, van Lee L et al. (2015) Evaluation of a nutrient-rich food index score in the Netherlands. J Nutr Sci 4, e14.
29. Streppel MT, Sluik D, van Yperen JF et al. (2014) Nutrient-rich foods, cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: the Rotterdam study. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 741747.
30. O'Sullivan TA, Bremner AP, Bremer HK et al. (2015) Dairy product consumption, dietary nutrient and energy density and associations with obesity in Australian adolescents. J Hum Nutr Diet 28, 452464.
31. Zhou Z, Hu W, Li M et al. (2014) Development and validation of a new model of desirable dietary pattern (N-DDP) score for Chinese diets. Public Health Nutr 17, 519528.
32. USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 1.0 (2004) Beltsville, MD. Agricultural research service, food surveys research group. http://www.Ars.Usda.Gov/services/docs.Htm?Docid=12082 (accessed January 2017).
33. Bowman SA, Friday JE & Moshfegh A (2008) MyPyramid Equivalents database, 2.0 for USDA survey foods, 2003–2004: Documentaiton and user Guide. Food Surveys Research Group. Beltsville, MD: Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.Ars.Usda.Gov/ba/bhnrc/fsrg (accessed January 2017).
34. US Food and Drug Administration (2016). Code of federal regulations, title 21-food and drugs. http://www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.Cfm?Fr=101.9 (accessed January 2017).
35. ILSI North America (2016). Branded food products database. http://ilsina.Org/our-work/research-tools-open-data/bfpd/ (accessed January 2017).
36. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (2015) Scientific report: Appendix E-3.2: food group contributions to nutrients in USDA food patterns and current nutrient intakes. https://health.Gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/15-appendix-e3/e3-2.asp (accessed January 2017).
37. Nijman CAJ, Zijp IM, Sierksma A et al. (2006) A method to improve the nutritional quality of foods and beverages based on dietary recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 461471.
38.The Nestlé nutritional profiling system, its product categories and sets of criteria. http://www.Nestle.Com/asset-ibrary/documents/library/documents/nutrition_health_wellness/nestle-nutritional-profiling-system.Pdf (accessed January 2017).
39. US Food And Drug Administration (2016). Use of the term ‘healthy’ in the labeling of human food products: guidance for industry. https://www.Fda.Gov/downloads/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/ucm521692.Pdf (accessed January 2017).
40. Fahmida U, Santika O, Kolopaking R et al. (2014) Complementary feeding recommendations based on locally available foods in Indonesia. Food Nutr Bull 35, S174S179.
41. Food And Drug Administration Law Blog (2017). FDA meeting to discuss the meaning and use of the term ‘healthy’ for foods. http://www.Fdalawblog.Net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/2017/02/fda-meeting-to-discuss-the-meaning-and-use-of-the-term-healthy-for-foods.Html (accessed January 2017).
42. US Food and Drug Administration (1994). Guide To Nutrition And Labeling And Education Act (NLEA) requirements. http://www.Fda.Gov/iceci/inspections/inspectionguides/ucm074948.Htm (accessed January 2017).
43. US Food And Drug Administration (2016). Changes to the nutrition facts label. https://www.Fda.Gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/labelingnutrition/ucm385663.Htm (accessed January 2017).
44. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (2015) Scientific Report, Part D. Chapter 1: food and nutrient intakes, and health: current status and trends – continued. https://health.Gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/06-chapter-1/d1-2.Asp (accessed January 2017).
45. Trumbo P, Yates AA, Schlicker S et al. (2001) Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. J Am Diet Assoc 101, 294301.
46. Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA et al. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 16211630.
47. Rayner M, Scarborough P, Stockley L et al. (2005) Nutrient profiles: further refinement and testing of model SSCG3D. Final Report. http://www.Food.Gov.Uk/multimedia/pdfs/npreportsept05.Pdf (accessed December 2016).
48. Drewnowski A & Rehm CD (2013) Vegetable cost metrics show that potatoes and beans provide most nutrients per penny. PLoS ONE 8, e63277.
49. Fonds Francais Pour Alimentaiton et la santé. Experimentation logos nutritionnels. http://alimentation-sante.Org/category/experimentation-logos-nutritionnels/ (accessed December 2016).
50. Julia C, Méjean C, Péneau S et al. (2016) The 5-CNL front-of-pack nutrition label appears an effective tool to achieve food substitutions towards healthier diets across dietary profiles. PLoS ONE 11, e0157545.
51. Mendoza A, Perez AE, Aggarwal A et al. (2017) Energy density of foods and diets in Mexico and their monetary cost by socioeconomic strata: analyses of ENSANUT data 2012. J Epidemiol Commun Health [Epublication ahead of print version].
52. The Santiago Times (2017) Chilean government plans to ram through nex tax on sugary foods. http://santiagotimes.Cl/2017/01/17/chilean-government-plans-to-ram-through-new-tax-on-sugary-foods/ (accessed January 2017).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 151 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 721 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th June 2017 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.