Skip to main content

The 2010 Midterm Elections: Signs and Portents for the Decennial Redistricting

  • Michael P. McDonald (a1)

The 2010 midterm elections are consequential not only in terms of the candidates who were elected to office, but also in terms of the government policies that they will enact. High on the list of important policies is the decennial practice of drawing new redistricting plans for legislative offices. A new census reveals population shifts that will result in a reallocation of congressional seats among the states through apportionment and—following U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the 1960s—a re-balancing of congressional and state legislative district populations within states that aims to give fast-growing areas more representation and slow-growing areas less. Of course, much more than an innocuous administrative adjustment occurs during the process of redistricting. The individuals who draw districts are keenly aware that district lines may affect the fortunes of incumbents, political parties, and minority voters' candidates of choice.

Hide All
Altman, Micah, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2010. “The Promise and Perils of Computers in Redistricting.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy 5: 69112.
Cain, Bruce E. 1984. The Reapportionment Puzzle. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1998. “Estimating the Impact of Voting-Rights-Related Districting on Democratic Strength.” In Race and Redistricting in the 1990s, ed. Grofman, Bernard, 5166. New York: Agathon.
Lawrence, Steve. 2001. “Democrats May Not Seek Big Gains in House Delegation.” Associated Press State and Local Wire, August 14.
Levitt, Justin. 2008. A Citizen's Guide to Redistricting. New York: Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law.
Levitt, Justin, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2007. “Taking the ‘Re’ out of Redistricting: State Constitutional Provisions on Redistricting Timing.” Georgetown Law Review 95 (4): 1,247–86.
McDonald, Michael P. 1999. Optimal Probabilistic Gerrymandering: Theory and Consequences for a Changing Electorate. Unpublished Ph.D. diss, University of California, San Diego.
McDonald, Michael P. 2004. “A Comparative Analysis of U.S. State Redistricting Institutions.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (4): 371–96.
McDonald, Michael P. 2006. “Drawing the Line on District Competition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (1): 9194.
McDonald, Michael P. 2009. Midwest Mapping Project [monograph]. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
Owen, Guillermo, and Grofman, Bernard. 1988. “Optimal Partisan Gerrymandering.” Political Geography Quarterly 7:522.
Parker, Frank R. 1990. Black Votes Count. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Reader, Scot A. 1994. “One Person, One Vote Revisited: Choosing a Population Basis to Form Political Districts.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17: 521–65.
Riskin, Jonathan. 2002. “GOP Missteps Were Hallmark of Redistricting.” Columbus Dispatch, January 20, 3C.
Schotts, Kenneth W. 2001. “The Effect of Majority–Minority Mandates on Partisan Gerrymandering.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 120–35.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 179 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.