Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-5zjcf Total loading time: 0.261 Render date: 2022-08-11T00:02:34.698Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Direct-Democracy Rules: The Effect of Direct Democracy on State Immigration Legislation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2018

Andrea Silva*
Affiliation:
University of North Texas

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Stepping Back or Stepping Out? Latinos, Immigration, and the 2016 Presidential Election
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amenta, Edwin, and Carruthers, Bruce G.. 1988. “The Formative Years of US Social Spending Policies: Theories of the Welfare State and the American States during the Great Depression.” American Sociological Review 53 (5): 661–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishin, Benjamin. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2002. “The Effect of Direct Democracy on the Size and Diversity of State Interest Group Populations.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, George J. 1990. Friends or Strangers: The Impact of Immigrants on the U.S. Economy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boushey, Graeme, and Luedtke, Adam. 2011. “Immigrants across the US Federal Laboratory: Explaining State-Level Innovation in Immigration Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (4): 390414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2002. “Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCamillo, Mark, and Field, Mervin. 2012. “California Voters Somewhat Ambivalent about Government Policies toward Illegal Immigrants Living Here.” Field Research Corporation. Available at http://web.archive.org/web/20130727183554/http://field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2430.pdf. (accessed December 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Dolowitz, David, and Marsh, David. 1996. “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44 (2): 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno. 1994. “Direct Democracy: Politico-Economic Lessons from Swiss Experience.” American Economic Review 84 (2): 338–42.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2015. “In US, 65% Favor Path to Citizenship for Illegal Immigrants.” Available at http://news.gallup.com/poll/184577/favor-path-citizenship-illegal-immigrants.aspx (accessed October 13, 2017).Google Scholar
Gallup. 2017. “Americans More Positive about Effects of Immigration.” Available at http://news.gallup.com/poll/213146/americans-positive-effectsimmigration.aspx?g_source=IMMIGRATION&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles (accessed October 13, 2017).Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 99128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1998. “Pressuring Legislatures Through the Use of the Initiatives: Two Forms of Indirect Influence.” In Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States (Parliaments and Legislatures Series), eds. Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline J., 191208. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Gulasekaram, Pratheepan. 2011. “Why a Wall?” University of California Irvine Law Review 2 (1): 147.Google Scholar
Initiative and Referendum Institute. 2017. “State I&R.” Available at www.iandrinstitute.org/states.cfm (accessed October 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service. 2016. “Exempt Organizations Business Master File Extract (EO BMF).” Available at www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/exempt-organizations-businessmaster-file-extract-eo-bmf (accessed August 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul. 2004. “Cross-Sectional Time Series.” Available at http://pj.freefaculty.org/guides/stat/Regression/TimeSeries-Longitudinal-CXTS/CXTS1.pdf. (accessed December 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Matsusaka, John G.. 2004. “Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1): 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. 1787. Federalist No. 10: “The Same Subject Continued: The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection.” New York Daily Advertiser, November 22. https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=10 (accessed December 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., Durand, Jorge, and Malone, Nolan J.. 2003. Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G., and McCarty, Nolan M.. 2001. “Political Resource Allocation: Benefits and Costs of Voter Initiatives.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 17 (2): 413–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection, second edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Monogan, James E. 2013. “The Politics of Immigrant Policy in the 50 US States, 2005–2011.” Journal of Public Policy 33 (1): 3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2016. Report On 2016 State Immigration Laws. http://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/report-on-2016-state-immigration-laws-january-june.aspx (access December 14, 2017).Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2017. Full- And Part-Time Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/full-and-part-time-legislatures.aspx (access December 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Ngai, Mae M. 2004. Impossible Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1995. “Fragmented Welfare States: Federal Institutions and the Development of Social Policy.” Governance 8 (4): 449–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provine, Doris Marie, Varsanyi, Monica W., Lewis, Paul G., and Decker, Scott H.. 2016. Policing Immigrants: Local Law Enforcement on the Front Lines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Ross. 2017. “UT/TT Poll: Immigration, Border Security Still Top Concerns for Texas Voters.” The Texas Tribune. June 16. Available at www.texastribune.org/2017/06/16/uttt-poll-immigration-border-security-remain-top-worry-texas-voters. (access December 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Rothman, Eric S., and Espenshade, Thomas J.. 1992. “Fiscal Impacts of Immigration to the United States.” Population Index, Office of Population Research 58 (3): 381415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampaio, Anna. 2015. Terrorizing Latina/o Immigrants: Race, Gender, and Immigration Policy Post-9/11. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Waslin, Michelle. 2011. “The Secure Communities Program: Unanswered Questions and Continuing Concerns.” Washington, DC: Immigration Policy Center. Available at www.ilw.com/articles/2011,0218-waslin.pdf. (access December 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Silva supplementary material

Appendix

Download Silva supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 45 KB
2
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Direct-Democracy Rules: The Effect of Direct Democracy on State Immigration Legislation
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Direct-Democracy Rules: The Effect of Direct Democracy on State Immigration Legislation
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Direct-Democracy Rules: The Effect of Direct Democracy on State Immigration Legislation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *