Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-s84wp Total loading time: 0.204 Render date: 2022-07-05T06:59:41.850Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Drawing Politics in Pink and Blue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2007

Janis L. Edwards
Affiliation:
University of Alabama

Extract

Assessing the current condition of editorial cartooning invites engagement in a number of potential perspectives: Cartoons may be positioned as journalism, artistic expression, entertaining satire, and political and historical record. A rhetorical perspective examines cartoons as expressions of political discourse positioned within the wider culture that defines, constructs, and frames larger social ideologies as a backdrop to events of the day. Cartoonists accomplish this task not only by devising explicit messages about their subjects, but in the implicit expression of societal norms and values in the conceptual lenses and commonplaces they employ. This essay considers the conceptual lens of gender as it has been used by cartoonists in recent years to frame politicians, and the implications of that framing.

Type
SYMPOSIUM—U.S. POLITICS
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Karrin Vasby, and Kristina Horn Sheeler. 2005. Governing Codes: Gender, Metaphor, and Political Identity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Blankenship, Jane. 1972. “ The Search for the 1972 Democratic Nomination: A Metaphorical Perspective.” In Rhetoric and Communication, eds. Jane Blankenship and Hermann G. Stelzner. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Borelli, Mary Anne, and Janet M. Martin, eds. 1997. The Other Elites: Women, Politics, Power in the Executive Branch. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Braden, Maria. 1996. Women Politicians and the Media. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Carroll, Susan J., and Richard L. Fox. 2006. Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crowe, J. D. 2006. Cartoon. www.cagle.com/news/Hillary2008/images/crowe.gif. 25 August.
Culbertson, Todd. 1987. “Political Cartoons: Following the Laugh Track.” Public Opinion (September/October): 18–9, 58.
Doty, William G. 1993. Myths of Masculinity. New York: Crossroad.
Doyle, James A. 1989. The Male Experience. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
Ducat, Stephen J. 2004. The Wimp Factor: Gender Gaps, Holy Wars, and the Politics of Anxious Masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
Edwards, Janis L. 2000. “Beyond Stereotypes: Female Authority in Editorial Cartoons.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Sacramento, CA.
Edwards, Janis L., and Huey Rong Chen. 2000. “The First Lady/First Wife in Editorial Cartoons: Rhetorical Visions through Gendered Lenses.” Women's Studies in Communication 23: 36791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Lynne E. 2002. Women and Politics: The Pursuit of Equality. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Gamble, Teri Kwal, and Michael W. Gamble. 2003. The Gender Communication Connection. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gutgold, Nichola. 2006. Paving the Way for Madam President. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Hernandez, Debra Gersch. 1994. “Cartoonists Confront Political Correctness.” Editor & Publisher, 6 August, 14, 34.
Horsey, David. 1992. Cartoon. National Gallery of Editorial Cartoons, 26 July, 7.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. The Double Bind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jeffords, Susan. 1994. Hard Bodies: Hollywood Masculinity in the Reagan Era. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Marlette, Doug. 1988. “Gone with the Wimp.” Cartoon. National Forum of Editorial Cartoons, March.
Miller, Elaine K. 1993. “ Politics and Gender: Geraldine Ferraro in the Editorial Cartoons.” In Feminist Theory and the Study of Folklore, eds. Susan Tower Hollis, Linda Pershing, and M. Jane Young. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Oliphant, Patrick. 1988. Cartoon. San Jose Mercury News, 18 October, 7B.
Parry-Giles, Shawn J., and Trevor Parry-Giles. 2002. Constructing Clinton: Hyperreality and Presidential Image-Making in Postmodern Politics. New York: Peter Lang.
Payne, Henry. 1988. “Round Two.” Cartoon. Political Pix 44, 24 October.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Mike. 2000. Cartoon. Best Editorial Cartoons 12: 17, 7.Google Scholar
Renault, Dennis. 1988. Cartoon. Sacramento Bee 30 September, F4.
Sena, John F. 1985. “A Picture is Worth a Thousand Votes: Geraldine Ferraro and the Editorial Cartoonists.” Journal of American Culture 8: 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreberny, Annabelle, and Liesbet van Zoonen. 2000. Gender, Politics, and Communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Trujillo, Nick. 1991. “Hegemonic Masculinity on the Mound: Media Representations of Nolan Ryan and the American Sports Culture.” Critical Studies of Mass Communication 8 (3): 290308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viens, Margaret F. 1993. Never Underestimate … : The Life and Career of Margaret Chase Smith Through the Eyes of the Political Cartoonist. Waterville, ME: Northwood University Margaret Chase Smith Library.
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2000. “ Constructing Masculinities in U.S. Presidential Campaigns: The Case of 1992.” In Gender, Politics, and Communication, eds. Annabelle Sreberny and Liesbet van Zoonen. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Watson, Robert P., and Ann Gordon, eds. 2003. Anticipating Madam President. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Whitaker, Lois Duke. 1999. Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wood, Julia T. 1994. Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Wood, Harriet. 2000. Stepping Up to Power: The Political Journey of American Women. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wright, Don. 1992. Cartoon. National Gallery of Editorial Cartoons, 4 October, 2.
8
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Drawing Politics in Pink and Blue
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Drawing Politics in Pink and Blue
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Drawing Politics in Pink and Blue
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *