Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-fnprw Total loading time: 0.267 Render date: 2022-08-12T02:49:44.448Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Five Years Later: A Re-Assessment of Oregon's Vote by Mail Electoral Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2004

Priscilla L. Southwell
Affiliation:
University of Oregon

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Features
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berinsky Adam, Nancy Burns, and Michael W. Traugott. 2001Who Votes by Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (2): 178197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broder David S. 2000Vive Vote-By-Mail.” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 30, A17.
Burnham Walter D. 1982 The Current Crisis in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cain Brad. 2002Nation's Sole Vote-by-Mail System Gets Another Test.” The Associated Press State & Local Wire, May 4.
Calvert Jerry W., and Jack Gilchrist. 1993Suppose They Held an Election and Almost Everyone Came.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (4): 695670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNardo James. 1986Does Heavy Turnout Help the Democrats?” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 12911299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton Randy H. 1988American All-Mail Balloting: A Decade's Experience.” Public Administration Review 48 (3): 860866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highton Benjamin, and Raymond E. Wolfinger. 1999 The Political Implications of Higher Turnout. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.
Jeffe Douglas, and Sherry B. Jeffe. 1990Absence Counts: Voting by Mail.” The American Enterprise 1 (1): 1921.Google Scholar
Karp Jeffery A., and Susan A. Banducci. 2001Absentee Voting, Mobilization, and Participation.” American Politics Research 29 (2): 183195.Google Scholar
Magleby David. 1987Participation in Mail Ballot Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 40 (1): 7982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mail-In Democracy.” 1996 New York Times, February 8, A24.
Mutch Robert. 1992Voting by Mail.” State Legislatures 18 (1): 2931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel Jack H., and John E. McNulty. 2000 Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 28 (3): 408429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver J. Eric. 1996The Effects of Eligibility Restrictions and Party Activity on Absentee Voting and Overall Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 498513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oregon Annual Social Indicators Survey. 2003 Oregon Survey Research Laboratory, University of Oregon.
Oregon's New Idea.” 1996 Washington Post, February 5, A20.
Oregon State Legislature, 1997 H.B. 3086, 69th Legislature, Regular Session.
Patterson Samuel C., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1985Mailing in the Vote: Correlates and Consequences of Absentee Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 766788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven Frances F., and Richard A. Cloward. 1988 Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon.
Prengaman Peter. 2003Oregon's Voting System to Get Revamped.” Associated Press State & Local Wire, August 10.Google Scholar
Quigley Fran. 1995Social Welfare and Ideological Attitudes of United States Nonvoters: Assessing the Potential Impact of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 23 (2): 213227.Google Scholar
Radcliff Benjamin. 1994Turnout and the Democratic Vote.” American Politics Quarterly 22 (3): 249265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose Melody. 2002Commentary: State's Vote-by-Mail Fails to Fulfill its Promise.” The Oregonian, October 20, F01.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld Margaret. 1995All-Mail-Ballot Elections.” Innovations in Election Administration. Washington, D.C.: The National Clearinghouse on Election Administration/Federal Election Commission.
Secretary of State, State of Oregon. 1995Oregon's Special Senate Election.” Salem, OR, November 11.
Secretary of State, State of Oregon. 2000Vote by Mail.” Salem, OR, March.
Southwell Priscilla L., and Justin Burchett. 1997Survey of Vote-by-Mail Senate Election in the State of Oregon.” PS: Political Science and Politics 91 (1): 5357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwell Priscilla L., and Justin Burchett. 2000The Effect of All-Mail Elections on Voter Turnout.” American Politics Quarterly. 29 (1): 7280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott Michael. W. 1996 Report on the Characteristics of the Oregon Electorate Participating in the Special General Election for the U.S. Senate on January 30, 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
18
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Five Years Later: A Re-Assessment of Oregon's Vote by Mail Electoral Process
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Five Years Later: A Re-Assessment of Oregon's Vote by Mail Electoral Process
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Five Years Later: A Re-Assessment of Oregon's Vote by Mail Electoral Process
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *