Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-k78ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T06:20:41.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inequality, American Democracy, and American Political Science: The Need for Cumulative Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2006

Jacob S. Hacker
Affiliation:
Yale University

Extract

The members of the Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy were not of one mind about any of the subjects they took up—and this is one reason, among many, that it was the most vibrant and stimulating professional collaboration I have had the privilege to be part of. It would be presumptuous of me to speak for anyone but myself in explaining and justifying the Task Force's work. And yet, there does seem to me at least one note of common explanation required up front. All the members of the Task Force, I am certain, saw their work as only the beginning of a discussion within the discipline—and, indeed, more broadly—about the relationship between inequality and contemporary American governance. Although we hoped to showcase and integrate the best existing research and theory, our main goal was to spark new questions, new research, new thinking, and new debates. And judging from this forum, as well as from the recent scholarship showcased in Larry Bartels's (2006) and Kay Schlozman's (2006) essays, we have.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, Larry M. 2006. “Is the Water Rising? Reflections on Inequality and American Democracy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39(January): 3942.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 2004. What Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 24360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Theda Skocpol, eds. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The GI Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595628.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox. 2006. “Response to American Democracy in the Age of Inequality.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39(January): 4346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teles, Steven. 1996. Whose Welfare? AFDC and Elite Politics. Lawrence: Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven. Forthcoming. Parallel Paths. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 2006. “On Inequality and Political Voice: Response to Stephen Earl Bennett's Critique.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39(January): 5557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar