Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2018


Matthew Motta
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Americans’ attitudes toward scientists have become more negative in recent years. Although researchers have considered several individual-level factors that might explain this change, little attention has been given to the political actions of scientists themselves. This article considers how March for Science rallies that took place across the United States in late April 2017 influenced Americans’ attitudes toward scientists and the research they produce. An online panel study surveying respondents three days before and two days after the March found that liberals’ and conservatives’ attitudes toward scientists polarized following the March. Liberals’ attitudes toward scientists became more positive whereas conservatives’ attitudes became more negative. However, the March appears to have had little effect on the public’s attitudes about scientific research. In addition to answering questions about the March’s political impact, this research calls attention to the possibility that the political actions of scientists can shape public opinion about them.


Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M.. 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Card, David. 1985. “Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (4): 648–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph, and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, Joshua M., and Shaw, Daron. 2015. “Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes Toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, and Druckman, James N.. 2015. “Counteracting the Politicization of Science.” Journal of Communication 65 (5): 745–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, Druckman, James N., and Cook, Fay L.. 2015. “Citizens, Scientists, and Policy Advisors Beliefs about Global Warming.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 271–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulle, Robert J. 2018. “Critical Reflections on the March for Science.” Sociological Forum 33: 255–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Scott, Jewell, Ryan M., and Waggoner, Phillip D.. 2015. “Are Samples Drawn from Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology?” Research & Politics 2 (4): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cofnas, Nathan, Carl, Noah, and Woodley of Menie, Michael A.. 2017. “Does Activism in Social Science Explain Conservatives’ Distrust of Scientists?” The American Sociologist 49 (1): 114.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, Gordon W. 2008. “A Test of Three Theories of Anti-Science Attitudes.” Sociological Focus 41 (4): 337–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, Gordon W. 2012. “Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010.” American Sociological Review 77 (2): 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, Gordon, O’Brien, Timothy, and Mirosa, Oriol. 2017. “The Legitimacy of Environmental Scientists in the Public Sphere.” Climatic Change 143 (3): 297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Caitlin. 2017. “The March for Science was a Moment Made for Bill Nye.” Washington Post, April 23. Available at www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-march-for-science-was-a-moment-made-for-bill-nye/2017/04/23.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1963. Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido, and Wooldridge, Jeffrey. 2007. “Differences-in-Differences Estimation.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified Summer 2007. Available at www.nber.org/WNE/lect10diffindiffs.pdf.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Wittlin, Maggie, Slovic, Paul, Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore, Braman, Donald, and Mandel, Gregory. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (10): 732–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levay, Kevin E., Freese, Jeremy, and Druckman, James N.. 2016. “The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples.” Sage Open 6 (1): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March for Science. 2017. “About Us.” Available at www.marchforscience.com/mission.Google Scholar
McCright, Arron M., Dentzman, Katherine, Charters, Meghan, and Dietz, Thomas. 2013. “The Influence of Political Ideology on Trust in Science.” Environmental Research Letters 8 (4): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, Arron M., Dunlap, Reily E., and Xiao, Chenyang. 2013. “Perceived Scientific Agreement and Support for Government Action on Climate Change in the USA.” Climatic Change 119 (2): 511–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, Matthew. 2017. “The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-Intellectualism in the United States.” American Politics Research 46 (3): 465–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, Megan. 2017. “Will the March for Science Backfire by Politicizing Science? It Depends on This.” Washington Post, April 21. Available at www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/04/21.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Thomas. 2017. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2017. “How Marching for Science Risks Politicizing It.” New York Times, May 2. Available at www.nytimes.com/2017/05/02/upshot/how-marching-for-science-risks-politicizing-it.html.Google Scholar
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald Thomas. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Smith, Noah. 2017. “March for Science Was Important, Silly Signs Aside.” Bloomberg Science, April 27. Available at www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-27/march-for-science-was-important-silly-signs-aside.Google Scholar
Sturgis, Patrick, and Allum, Nick. 2004. “Science in Society: Reevaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes.” Public Understanding of Science 13 (2): 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, Jimmy. 2017. “A Brief Survey of Trump’s Assault on Science.” Pacific Standard, July 24. Available at psmag.com/environment/a-brief-survey-of-trumps-assault-on-science.Google Scholar

Motta supplementary material

Motta supplementary material 1

[Opens in a new window]
PDF 137 KB

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 117
Total number of PDF views: 394 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 03rd July 2018 - 3rd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-b4dcdd7-tf8mx Total loading time: 0.303 Render date: 2020-12-03T14:31:50.955Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Thu Dec 03 2020 13:58:30 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *