Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j5sqr Total loading time: 0.998 Render date: 2022-10-05T14:46:50.860Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The Service/Politics Split: Rethinking Service to Teach Political Engagement*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Tobi Walker
Affiliation:
Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University

Extract

Over the past few years, I have experimented with a classroom exercise that encourages students to think about how they perceive service and politics. I ask the students to create lists of service activities and political activities in which they and their friends and families engage. The service list typically includes such activities as working in a soup kitchen, delivering meals to the homebound, tutoring in the school system, and cleaning up parks. The list of political activities usually includes things like voting, protesting, raising money, lobbying, letter writing, and running for office.

Turning students' attention to the list of community service activities, I ask them to give some adjectives that people might use to describe the listed projects. The students usually offer such descriptors as altruistic, caring, helping, selfless, and giving, as well as individualistic and one-on-one. Often, the students will also add the words selfish or insincere to describe those students who engage in community service to enhance their resume or earn academic credit.

Asked for adjectives that describe politics, the words come fast and furious—dirty, corrupt, ambitious, crooked, dishonest, compromising, slow. After the initial rush of negative descriptors and with little prompting on my part, students will also talk about politics as a means to affect social change and make a difference for groups of people.

I have used this exercise with audiences ranging from young women uninterested in politics, to young people planning careers in politics and policy making, to foundation officials.

Type
Special to PS
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Paula. 1984. “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780-1920.” American Historical Review 89:620–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corporation for National Service. 1996. National Service News 4, June 17, 1.Google Scholar
James, William. 1967. “The Moral Equivalent of War.” The Writings of William James, ed. McDermott, John J.New York: Random House.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Kathleen D. 1990. “Parallel Power Structures: Women and the Voluntary Sphere.” In Lady Bountiful Revisited: Women, Philanthropy, and Power, ed. McCarthy, Kathleen D.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Moskos, Charles. 1988. A Call to Civic Service. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
National Association of Secretaries of State. 1999. The New Millennium Project – Part I: American Youth Attitudes on Politics, Citizenship, Government and Voting <www.nass.org/nass99/youth.html>. Washington, DC: NASS. Accessed: June 1999..+Washington,+DC:+NASS.+Accessed:+June+1999.>Google Scholar
Pascoe, Peggy. 1990. Relations of Rescue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panetta Institute. 2000. “Institute Poll Shows College Students Turned Off by Politics, Turned On by Other Public Service” <www.panettainstitute.org/newsl.html>. Accessed: February 2000..+Accessed:+February+2000.>Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary P. 1979. “The Power of Women's Networks: A Case Study of Female Moral Reform in Antebellum America.” Feminist Studies 5(Spring): 6685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Anne Firor. 1990. “Women's Voluntary Associations: From Charity to Reform.” In Lady Bountiful Revisited: Women, Philanthropy, and Power, ed. McCarthy, Kathleen D.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Welter, Barbara. 1966. “The Cult of True Womanhood, 1820-1860.” American Quarterly 18:151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Service/Politics Split: Rethinking Service to Teach Political Engagement*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Service/Politics Split: Rethinking Service to Teach Political Engagement*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Service/Politics Split: Rethinking Service to Teach Political Engagement*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *