Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Conclusion: Managing (In)security in Post-Arab Spring Transitions

  • John Gledhill (a1)

Extract

The long-established authoritarian regimes in Libya, Yemen, and Egypt were very different in form. It is not surprising, therefore, that the way in which those regimes came to an end in 2011 varied significantly across cases. Nor is it surprising that the dynamics of transition in those cases have also varied since the Arab Spring. That said, the studies in this symposium have shown that, despite their many differences, processes of regime transition in Libya, Yemen, and Egypt have also shared two significant traits. First, disagreements among stakeholders over basic questions of institutional design have generated intense uncertainty about the nature of posttransition regimes. Second, political and military actors have occasionally turned to violence, in an effort to “resolve” their disagreements through force. In our symposium, we have tried to clarify the relationship between these shared traits of uncertainty and violence. To do this, we have disaggregated the concept of transitional uncertainty, considered the degree to which different forms of uncertainty have already fomented insecurity in post-Arab Spring states, and offered assessments of whether uncertainty may (continue to) prove destabilizing in those states going forward.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ashour, Omar. 2012. “From Bad Cop to Good Cop: The Challenge of Security Sector Reform in Egypt.” Paper Series, Number 3. Doha: Brookings Doha Center/Stanford Project on Arab Transitions. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/11/19%20security%20sector%20reform%20ashour/omar%20ashour%20english.pdf.
Charbonneau, Bruno. 2012. “War and Peace in Côte D'Ivoire: Violence, Agency, and the Local/International Line.” International Peacekeeping 19 (4): 508–24.
Ezzat, Dina. 2013. “US Still Backing Morsi as Army Remains Quiescent.” Ahram Online, January 29. http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/63559.aspx.
ICG. 2012. “Yemen: Enduring Conflicts, Threatened Transition.” Middle East Report N°125. Sanaa/Brussels: International Crisis Group. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iran%20Gulf/Yemen/125-yemen-enduring-conflicts-threatened-transition.pdf.
ICG. 2013. “Yemen's Military-Security Reform: Seeds of New Conflict?” Middle East Report N°139. Sanaa/Brussels: International Crisis Group. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iran%20Gulf/Yemen/139-yemens-military-security-reform-seeds-of-new-conflict.
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1990. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 23 (1): 121.
McFaul, Michael. 2001. Russia's Unfinished Revolution: Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
McFaul, Michael. 2002. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54 (2): 212–44.
McQuinn, Brian. 2012. “After the Fall: Libya's Evolving Armed Groups.” Geneva: Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/F-Working-papers/SAS-WP12-After-the-Fall-Libya.pdf.
Nossiter, Adam. 2011. “Strikes by U.N. and France Corner Leader of Ivory Coast.” New York Times, April 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/05/world/africa/05ivory.html?_r=0.
Perito, Robert, and Kristoff, Madeline. 2010. “Fighting Corruption in Security Sector Reform.” Peacebrief N° 32. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace. http://www.usip.org/files/resources/PB%2032%20Fighting%20Corruption%20in%20SSR.pdf.
Wulf, Herbert. 2004. “Security Sector Reform in Developing and Transitional Countries.” Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series No. 2—Security Sector Reform. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. http://www.berghof-handbook.net/documents/publications/dialogue2_wulf.pdf.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed