Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Data Access, Transparency, and Replication: New Insights from the Political Behavior Literature

  • Daniel Stockemer (a1), Sebastian Koehler (a2) and Tobias Lentz (a3)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.
Abstract

Do researchers share their quantitative data and are the quantitative results that are published in political science journals replicable? We attempt to answer these questions by analyzing all articles published in the 2015 issues of three political behaviorist journals (i.e., Electoral Studies, Party Politics, and Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties)all of which did not have a binding data-sharing and replication policy as of 2015. We found that authors are still reluctant to share their data; only slightly more than half of the authors in these journals do so. For those who share their data, we mainly confirmed the initial results reported in the respective articles in roughly 70% of the times. Only roughly 5% of the articles yielded significantly different results from those reported in the publication. However, we also found that roughly 25% of the articles organized the data and/or code so poorly that replication was impossible.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

In the original publication of this article, Tobias Lentz’s name was misspelled. The article has been updated to correct this error.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alvarez, R. Michael, Key, Ellen M., and Núñez, Lucas. 2018. “Research Replication: Practical Considerations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (2): 422–6.
Evanschitzky, Heiner, Baumgarth, Carsten, Hubbard, Raymond, and Scott Armstrong, J.. 2007. “Replication Research in Marketing Revisited: A Note on a Disturbing Trend.” Journal of Business Research 60 (4): 411–15.
Freese, Jeremy. 2007. “Overcoming Objections to Open-Source Social Science.” Sociological Methods & Research 36 (2): 220–26.
Gherghina, Sergiu, and Katsanidou, Alexia. 2013. “Data Availability in Political Science Journals.” European Political Science 12 (3): 333–49.
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015. “A Broader Conception of Political Science Publicity, Or Why I Refuse DA-RT and Yet Did Not Sign the ‘Delay DA-RT’ Petition.” The Plot: Politics Decoded. Blog, December 3. Available at www.the-plot.org/2015/12/03/a-broader-conception-of-political-science-publicity-or-why-i-refuse-da-rt-and-yet-did-not-sign-the-delay-da-rt-petition.
Ishiyama, John. 2014. “Data Access and Transparency in Political Science Journals.” Available at https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501457/m2/1/high_res_d/Data%20access%20presentation%20Ishiyama.pdf. Accessed November 6, 2017.
Key, Ellen M. 2016. “How Are We Doing? Data Access and Replication in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (2): 268–72.
King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28 (3): 443–99.
King, Gary. 2003. “The Future of Replication.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (1): 72107.
King, Gary. 2011. “Ensuring the Data-Rich Future of the Social Sciences.” Science 331 (6018): 719–21.
Lupia, Arthur, and Elman, Colin. 2014. “Openness in Political Science: Data Access and Research Transparency.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 1942.
Miguel, Edward, Camerer, Colin, Casey, Katherine, Cohen, Joshua, Esterling, Kevin M., Gerber, Alan, Glennerster, Rachel, et al. 2014. “Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research.” Science 343 (6166): 3031.
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349 (6251): aac4716.
Tenopir, Carol, Allard, Suzie, Douglass, Kimberly, Umur Aydinoglu, Arsev, Wu, Lei, Read, Eleanor, Manoff, Maribeth, and Frame, Mike. 2011. “Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions.” PloS One 6 (6): e21101.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A correction has been issued for this article: