Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

A Goal for Reform: Make Elections Worth Stealing

  • Todd Donovan (a1)

Election reforms have attracted substantial attention since the troubled elections of 2000. Some address problems in the administration of elections. Others aim to regulate the conduct of elected officials and lobbyists. A third category affects the structure by which elections are conducted. It is not clear whether the same over-arching problem motivates interest in these reforms. One common theme may be that public confidence in representation suffers as a result of actual or perceived deficiencies in the conduct of elections and elected officials. The failure to count votes accurately, the fact that eligible voters find they are unable to vote, the inability of minor parties to access ballots, revelations of scandalous relations between representatives and lobbyists, the power of wealthy donors, the lack of “civility” in political discourse, the uncompetitive nature of many elections, may all somehow act together to erode public trust, and reduce participation and engagement with representative democracy.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Anderson, Christopher J., and ChristineGuillory. 1997. “Political, Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy.” American Political Science Review91 (February): 6681.

Ansolabehere, Steven, James M.Snyder, and CharlesStewartIII2001. “Candidate Positioning in US House Races.” American Journal of Political Science45 (1): 13659.

Bartels, Larry. 2002. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior: 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science44 (1): 3550.

Blais, André, and KennethCarty. 1990. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout?European Journal of Political Research18 (2): 16781.

Burden, Barry C.2004. “Candidate Positioning in US Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science34: 21127.

Cox, Gary, and M. C.Munger. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures and Turnout in the 1982 US House Elections.” American Political Science Review83 (1): 21731.

Donovan, Todd, JanineParry, and ShaunBowler. 2005. “O Other, Where Art Thou? Support for Multi-Party Politics in the United States.” Social Science Quarterly86 (1): 14759.

Ferejohn, John. 1977. “On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review71: 16676.

Fiorina, Morris. 1973. “Electoral Margin, Constituency Influence and Policy Moderation: A Critical Assessment.” American Politics Quarterly1: 47998.

Groseclose, Tim, StevenLevitt, and James M.Snyder. 1999. “Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the US Congress.” American Political Science Review93 (1): 3350.

Hetherington, Marc. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review95 (3): 61931.

Layman, Geoffrey C., and ThomasCarsey. 2002. “Partisan Polarization and Conflict Extension in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 786802.

Mayhew, David. 1974. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity6 (3): 295317.

Sullivan, John L., and Eric M.Uslaner. 1978. “Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality. American Journal of Political Science22: 53653.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.