Skip to main content

Incivility and Standing Firm: A Second Layer of Partisan Division

  • Michael R. Wolf (a1), J. Cherie Strachan (a2) and Daniel M. Shea (a3)

Political observers have detected a noticeable uptick in American political incivility in recent years, culminating with several moderate senators recently citing the rise of hard-core partisanship as the reason for their retirement. Supporting these accusations of unprecedented incivility with empirical evidence can be difficult, as notions of what constitutes appropriate, civil behavior are subjective and can vary across the political context of different eras. Was it more uncivil, for example, for William Jennings Bryan to accuse his political opponents of crucifying other Americans on a cross of gold than it was for a member of Congress to yell “You lie!” at the president in the nation's Capitol? Assessing the incivility of these statements requires determining the effect each had on political opponents' abilities to maintain a functional relationship despite their disagreement over policy outcomes. Nevertheless, many politicians, political observers, and scholars are truly concerned that current levels of incivility are indeed worse, not only damaging the ability to resolve complex public problems, but threatening the long-term stability of America's governing institutions. Largely focusing on changes in institutional structures and elite behavior, scholars identify numerous explanations for this trend.

Hide All
Abramowitz A. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Abramowitz A., and Saunders K.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–55.
Barabas J. 2004. “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 687701.
Berelson B., Lazarsfeld P., and McPhee W.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Black E., and Black M.. 2002. The Rise of the Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown P., and Levinson S.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carmines E., and Stimson J.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Drew E. 2000. The Corruption of American Politics: What Went Wrong and Why. New York: Overlook Press.
Fiorina M., and Abrams S.. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Fiorina M., Abrams S., and Pope J.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Longman.
Geer J. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hetherington M. J., and Weiler J. D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herbst S. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Huckfeldt R., Johnson P., and Sprague J.. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt R., Morehouse Mendez J., and Osborn T.. 2004. “Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogenous Networks.” Political Psychology 25 (1): 6595.
Jamieson K. H., Waldman P., and Sherr S.. 2000. “Eliminate the Negative? Categories of Analysis for Political Advertisements.” In Thurber J., Nelson C., and Dulio D., Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, 4464. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Mutz D. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mutz D. 2002. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (1) 111–26.
Pew Research Center. 2007. Broad Support for Political Compromise in Washington. January 22. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from Pew Research Center for the People and the Press:
Pew Research Center. 2010. Little Compromise on Compromising. September 20. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from Pew Research Center for the People and the Press:
Reiter H., and Stonecash J.. 2011. Counter Realignment: Political Change in the Northeastern United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 61 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 269 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.