Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

New Support for the Big Sort Hypothesis: An Assessment of Partisan Geographic Sorting in California, 1992–2010

  • Jesse Sussell (a1)

This article empirically examines the “Big Sort hypothesis”—the notion that, in recent years, liberal and conservative Americans have become increasingly spatially isolated from one another. Using block group-, tract-, and county-level party registration data and presidential election returns, I construct two formal indices of segregation for 1992–2010 in California and evaluate those indices for evidence of growth in the segregation of Californians along ideological lines. Evidence of rising geographic segregation between Democrats and Republicans for measures generated from both party registration and presidential vote data is found. This growth is statistically significant for 10 of the 12 segregation measures analyzed. In addition, many of the increases are practically significant, with estimates of growth in segregation during the observation period ranging from 2% to 23%.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Richard D. Alba , John R. Logan , and Brian J. Stults . 2000. “How Segregated Are Middle-Class African Americans?Social Problems 47 (4): 543–58.

Mark D. Brewer , Mack D. Mariani , and Jeffrey M. Stonecash . 2002. “Northern Democrats and Party Polarization in the US House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (3): 423–44.

Chiquita A. Collins , and David R. Williams . 1999. “Segregation and Mortality: The Deadly Effects of Racism?Sociological Forum 14 (3): 495523.

Brigitte M. Erbe 1975. “Race and Socioeconomic Segregation.” American Sociological Review 40 (December): 801–12.

Matthew Gentzkow , and Jesse M. Shapiro . 2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline (Online Appendix).” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1799–839.

Elisabeth R. Gerber , and Jeffrey B. Lewis . 2004. “Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation.” Journal of Political Economy 112 (6): 1364–383.

Edward L. Glaeser , and Bryce A. Ward . 2006. “Myths and Realities of American Political Geography.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 119–44.

John E. Jackson , and John W. Kingdon . 1992. “Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 805–23.

Jerry A. Jacobs 1989. “Long-Term Trends in Occupational Segregation by Sex.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 160–73.

Gary C. Jacobson 2004. “Partisan and Ideological Polarization in the California Electorate.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4 (2): 113–39.

Ron Johnston . 2005. “Anglo-American Electoral Geography: Same Roots and Same Goals, but Different Means and Ends?The Professional Geographer 57 (4): 580–87.

Stanley Lieberson , and Donna K. Carter . 1982. “Temporal Changes and Urban Differences in Residential Segregation: A Reconsideration.” American Journal of Sociology 88 (2): 296310.

Douglas S. Massey , and Nancy A. Denton . 1988. “The Dimensions of Residential Segregation.” Social Forces 67 (2): 281315.

Douglas S. Massey , Jonathan Rothwell , and Thurston Domina . 2009. “The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 626 (1): 7490.

Ian McDonald . 2011. “Migration and Sorting in the American Electorate: Evidence from the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” American Politics Research 39 (3): 512–33.

Eric McGhee , and Daniel Krimm . 2009. “Party Registration and the Geography of Party Polarization.” Polity 41 (3): 345–67.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 48 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.