Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Replication, Research Transparency, and Journal Publications: Individualism, Community Models, and the Future of Replication Studies

  • John Ishiyama (a1)
Extract

Recently, the importance of research transparency via replication studies has been greatly discussed in most of the social sciences, political science included. Indeed, as Gherghina and Katsanidou (2013) and Freese (2007) note, to some extent, the discussion has been prompted by the tremendous changes in publishing in the past decade or so. With the enormous expansion in data availability and instant publication made possible by the Internet, there now are many opportunities to verify the findings presented in the discipline's major journals. “Replication, replication” has not only become the mantra for political science, but for economics, psychology, and quantitative sociology as well. These developments opened a debate on how to best “guard the high standards or research practice and allow for the maximum use of current knowledge for the further development of science” (Gherghina and Katsanidou 2013, 1; for similar sentiments see King 1995).

Copyright
References
Hide All
Dewald, William G., Thursby, Jerry G., and Anderson, Richard G.. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking Project.” The Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 76: 587603.
Freese, Jeremy. 2007. “Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science: Why Not Sociology?Sociological Methods and Research 36: 153–72.
Funder, David. 2013. “Does ‘Failure to Replicate’ Mean Failed Science?” Live Science at http://www.livescience.com/32041-revisiting-science-studies.html (accessed September 30, 2013).
Gherghina, Sergiu, and Katsanidou, Alexia. 2013. “Data Availability in Political Science Journals.” European Political Science. Advance online publication, March 1; doi:10.1057/eps.2013.8.
Gibson, James L. 1995. “Cautious Reflections on a Data Archiving Policy for Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28: 473–76.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, James, Patrick, Ray, James L., and Russett, Bruce. 2003a. “Editors' Joint Statement: Minimum Replication Standards for International Relations Journals.” International Studies Perspectives 4: 105.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Metelits, C., and Strand, H.. 2003b. “Posting Your Data: Will You Be Scooped or Will You Be Famous.” International Studies Perspectives 4: 8997.
James, Patrick. 2003. “Replication Policies and Practices in International Studies Quarterly.” International Studies Perspectives 4: 8588.
King, Gary. 1995. “Replication, Replication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28: 443–99.
King, Gary. 2003. “The Future of the Replication Movement.” International Studies Perspectives 4: 100–05.
King, Gary. 2006. “Publication, Publication.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39: 119–25.
McCullough, B. D., McGeary, Kerry Anne, and Harrison, Teresa D.. 2006. “Lessons from the JMCB archive.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38: 1093–107.
McCullough, B. D., and Vinod, H. D.. 2003. “Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver.” American Economic Review 93: 873–92.
Roediger, Henry. 2012. “Psychology's Woes and a Partial Cure: The Value of Replication.” APS Observer 25 (2) at http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2012/february-12/psychologys-woes-and-a-partial-cure-the-value-of-replication.html (accessed September 30, 2013).
Wicherts, Jelte M., Borsboom, Denny, Kats, Judith, and Molenaar, Dylan. 2006. “The Poor Availability of Psychological Research Data for Reanalysis.” American Psychologist 61: 726–28.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 432 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.