Skip to main content

Reputational Rankings of Peer-Reviewed Law Journals: A Survey Approach

  • Paul M. Collins (a1)

This article presents the results of the first-ever survey that captures how political scientists view peer-reviewed law journals with regard to overall impact, familiarity, and article quality, as well as reading and submission preferences. In addition, it examines the extent to which the evaluation of journal quality differs depending on a researcher’s methodological approach. I find that scholars generally agree on a set of top peer-reviewed law journals, although some differences do exist based on the methodological approach of the respondent. These results can be used by a wide range of scholars to formulate publication strategies and evaluate the scholarly productivity of their peers.

Hide All
American Psychological Association. 2016. “Law and Human Behavior.”
Arena, Phil. 2014. “Ranking IR Journals.”
Colgan, Jeff D. 2016. “Where is International Relations Going? Evidence From Graduate Training.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 486–98.
Crawford, Scott D., Couper, Mick P., and Lamias, Mark J.. 2001. “Web Surveys: Perceptions of Burden.” Social Science Computer Review 19 (2): 146–62.
Cross, Frank B. 1997. “Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance.” Northwestern University Law Review 92 (1): 251326.
Cullen, Colleen M., and Kalberg, Randall S.. 1995. “Chicago-Kent Law Review Faculty Scholarship Survey.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 70 (3): 1445–60.
Doyle, John. 2004. “Ranking Legal Periodicals and Some Other Numeric Uses of the Westlaw and Lexis Periodical Databases.” Legal Reference Services Quarterly 23 (2-3): 153.
Duke Law Center for Judicial Studies. 2016. “Judicature.”
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Wells, Martin T.. 2014. “Ranking Law Journals and the Limits of Journal Citation Reports.” Economic Inquiry 52 (4): 1301–14.
Epstein, Lee, and King, Gary. 2002. “The Rules of Inference.” University of Chicago Law Review 69 (1): 133.
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. 1981. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…” Law & Society Review 15 (3/4): 631–54.
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1998. “Law Reviews and Legal Scholarship: Some Comments.” Denver University Law Review 75 (2): 661–68.
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95160.
Garand, James C., and Giles, Micheal W.. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (2): 293308.
Garand, James C., Giles, Micheal W., Blais, Andre, and McLean, Iain. 2009. “Political Science Journals in Comparative Perspective: Evaluating Scholarly Journals in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (4): 695717.
Giles, Micheal W., and Garand, James C.. 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (4): 741–51.
Giles, Micheal W., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1975. “Political Scientists’ Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 8 (3): 254–56.
Jacobs, Jerry A. 2016. “Journal Rankings in Sociology: Using the H Index with Google Scholar.” The American Sociologist 47 (2): 192224.
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2012. “TRIP Around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries.”
Marshall, Bryan W., and Rothgeb, John M. Jr. 2011. “So You Want Tenure? Factors Affecting Tenure Decisions in Political Science Departments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (3): 571–77.
Martinek, Wendy L. 2011. “Report of the Professional Committee of the Law and Courts Section.” Law & Courts 21 (3): 2533.
McCormack, Nancy. 2009. “Peer Review and Legal Publishing: What Law Librarians Need to Know About Open, Single-Blind, and Double-Blind Reviewing.” Law Library Journal 101 (1): 5970.
McLean, Iain, Blais, Andre, Garand, James C., and Giles, Micheal. 2009. “Comparative Journal Rankings: A Survey Report.” Political Studies Review 7 (1): 1838.
Newton, Brent E. 2012. “Law Review Scholarship in the Eyes of the Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Justices: An Empirical Analysis.” Drexel Law Review 4 (2): 399416.
Rogelberg, Steven G., and Stanton, Jeffrey M.. 2007. “Understanding and Dealing with Organizational Survey Nonresponse.” Organizational Research Methods 10 (2): 195209.
Rothgeb, John M., and Burger, Betsy. 2009. “Tenure Standards in Political Science Departments: Results from a Survey of Department Chairs.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (3): 513–19.
Shapiro, Fred R. 2000. “The Most-Cited Law Reviews.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1): 389–96.
Stoan, Stephen K. 1984. “Research and Library Skills: An Analysis and Interpretation.” College & Research Libraries 45 (2): 99109.
Whicker, Marcia Lynn, Kronenfeld, Jennie Jacobs, and Strickland, Ruth Ann. 1993. Getting Tenure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Woods, Patrick Arthur. 2014. “Stop Counting (Or At Least Count Better).” Presented at the Jotwell 2014 Conference, Coral Gables, Florida.
Wuffle, A. 1989. “Uncle Wuffle’s Advice to the Advanced Graduate Student.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22 (4): 838–39.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Collins Jr. supplementary material
Collins Jr. supplementary material 1

 PDF (106 KB)
106 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed