Skip to main content Accessibility help

Tea Time in America? The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Elections

  • Christopher F. Karpowitz (a1), J. Quin Monson (a1), Kelly D. Patterson (a1) and Jeremy C. Pope (a1)


By winning the presidency and strengthening its majority in both chambers of Congress, the 2008 election gave control of the government to the Democratic Party. However, as the 2010 election season unfolded, the news for the Democratic Party could not have been much worse. Economic conditions had not improved dramatically. A bitter and lengthy fight over health care reform signaled to citizens that little had changed in how Washington, DC, governed. The stimulus package and its impact on the federal debt caused unease in a segment of the electorate that was concerned with the size of government. In this context, observers of American politics began to take note of the number of citizens affiliating with, or at least expressing favorability toward, a loose coalition of groups known as the Tea Party movement. Tea Party rallies began to occur throughout the United States, seeking to draw attention to the movement's primary issues.



Hide All
Barber, Michael, Mann, Chris, Monson, J. Quin, and Patterson, Kelly D.. 2010. “Online Polls and Registration Based Sampling: A New Method for Pre-Election Polling.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, May 13–16, Chicago, IL.
Berry, Jeffrey, and Schildkraut, Deborah. 1998. “Citizen Groups, Political Parties, and Electoral Coalitions.” In Social Movements and American Political Institutions, ed. Costain, Anne N. and McFarland, Andrew S., 136–58. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 83: 773–93.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1972. “Third Parties and Social Movements.” Dialogue 5: 311.
Meyer, David S., and Tarrow, Sydney. 1998. “A Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century.” In The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century, ed. Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney, 128. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1985. “The New American Political Party.” American Political Science Review 79 (4): 1,152–69.
Schwartz, Mildred A. 2010. “Interactions between Social Movements and U.S. Political Parties.” Party Politics 16: 587607.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed