Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Turrell, Gavin and Vandevijvere, Stefanie 2015. Socio-economic inequalities in diet and body weight: evidence, causes and intervention options. Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 18, Issue. 05, p. 759.


    Suggs, L. Suzanne Della Bella, Sara and Marques-Vidal, Pedro 2016. Low adherence of Swiss children to national dietary guidelines. Preventive Medicine Reports, Vol. 3, p. 244.


    Thornton, Lukar Olstad, Dana Lee Lamb, Karen and Ball, Kylie 2016. Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs.


    Velazquez, Cayley E. Black, Jennifer L. Billette, Jean-Michel Ahmadi, Naseam and Chapman, Gwen E. 2015. A Comparison of Dietary Practices at or En Route to School between Elementary and Secondary School Students in Vancouver, Canada. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 115, Issue. 8, p. 1308.


    Stephens, Teya A. Black, Jennifer L. Chapman, Gwen E. Velazquez, Cayley E. and Rojas, Alejandro 2016. Participation in School Food and Nutrition Activities among Grade 6–8 Students in Vancouver. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, Vol. 77, Issue. 3, p. 148.


    ×

Associations between socio-economic status and school-day dietary intake in a sample of grade 5–8 students in Vancouver, Canada

  • Naseam Ahmadi (a1), Jennifer L Black (a1), Cayley E Velazquez (a1), Gwen E Chapman (a1) and Gerry Veenstra (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014001499
  • Published online: 07 August 2014
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To examine associations between students’ socio-economic status (SES) and school-day dietary intake, and the roles of parents and peers in shaping these associations.

Design

A cross-sectional survey measured school-day intake of vegetables, whole grains, low-fat milk, packaged snack foods and sugar-sweetened beverages. Logistic regression models examined associations between SES (parental education and food insecurity status) and dietary outcomes during or en route to or from school, and examined whether peer modelling or parental norms potentially mediated the associations between SES and dietary outcomes.

Setting

Twenty-six public schools in Vancouver, Canada in 2012.

Subjects

Nine hundred and fifty students in grades 5–8.

Results

Students whose parents completed some college, compared with those completing high school or less, were significantly more likely to consume vegetables daily (unadjusted OR=1·85; 95 % CI 1·06, 3·22) and students whose parents completed college or university were significantly less likely to consume sugar-sweetened beverages daily (unadjusted OR=0·67; 95 % CI 0·47, 0·94). Food secure students were also significantly less likely to consume sugar-sweetened beverages daily compared with food insecure students (unadjusted OR=0·52; 95 % CI 0·29, 0·92). Parental norms, but not peer modelling, emerged as a potential mediator of the association between SES and vegetable intake. SES was not significantly associated with the remaining dietary outcomes.

Conclusions

Higher SES was significantly associated with two of five school-day dietary outcomes and predicted higher likelihood of daily nutritious food choices at school. The present study suggests that there is room for improvement in school-day dietary quality for students from all SES backgrounds in Vancouver.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Associations between socio-economic status and school-day dietary intake in a sample of grade 5–8 students in Vancouver, Canada
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Associations between socio-economic status and school-day dietary intake in a sample of grade 5–8 students in Vancouver, Canada
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Associations between socio-economic status and school-day dietary intake in a sample of grade 5–8 students in Vancouver, Canada
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email j.black@ubc.ca
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2.D Demory-Luce , M Morales , T Nicklas et al. (2004) Changes in food group consumption patterns from childhood to young adulthood: The Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 16841691.

3.R Briefel , M Crepinsek , C Cabili et al. (2009) School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors of US public school children. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 2 Suppl., S91S107.

4.C Gonzalez-Suarez , A Worley , K Grimmer-Somers et al. (2009) School-based interventions on childhood obesity: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 37, 418427.

5.I De Bourdeaudhuij , E Van Cauwenberghe , H Spittaels et al. (2011) School-based interventions promoting both physical activity and healthy eating in Europe: a systematic review within the HOPE project. Obes Rev 12, 205216.

6.M Hanson & E Chen (2007) Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 30, 263285.

8.L Ricciuto & V Tarasuk (2007) An examination of income-related disparities in the nutritional quality of food selections among Canadian households from 1986–2001. Soc Sci Med 64, 186198.

12.M Richter , I Moor & F van Lenthe (2012) Explaining socioeconomic differences in adolescent self-rated health: the contribution of material, psychosocial and behavioural factors. J Epidemiol Community Health 66, 691697.

13.P Martikainen , M Bartley & E Lahelma (2002) Psychosocial determinants of health in social epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 31, 10911093.

14.T Baranowski , M Davis , K Resnicow et al. (2000) Gimme 5 fruit, juice, and vegetables for fun and health: outcome evaluation. Health Educ Behav 27, 96111.

16.T Baranowski , LS Lin , DW Wetter et al. (1997) Theory as mediating variables: why aren’t community interventions working as desired? Ann Epidemiol 7, Suppl., S89S95.

17.T Baranowski , KW Cullen & J Baranowski (1999) Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake: advancing dietary intervention. Annu Rev Nutr 19, 1740.

19.A Birnbaum , L Lytle , D Murray et al. (2002) Survey development for assessing correlates of young adolescents’ eating. Am J Health Behav 26, 284295.

20.RM Hanning , D Royall , JE Toews et al. (2009) Web-based food behaviour questionnaire: validation with grades six to eight students. Can J Diet Pract Res 70, 172178.

21.R Pawlak & B Malinauskas (2008) Predictors of intention to eat 2.5 cups of vegetables among ninth-grade students attending public high schools in eastern North Carolina. J Nutr Educ Behav 40, 392398.

26.C Currie , R Elton , J Todd et al. (1997) Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ Res 12, 385397.

27.J Delva , P O’Malley & L Johnston (2007) Availability of more-healthy and less-healthy food choices in American schools: a national study of grade, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic differences. Am J Prev Med 33, 4 Suppl., S226S239.

28.LA Lytle , S Varnell , DM Murray et al. (2003) Predicting adolescents’ intake of fruits and vegetables. J Nutr Educ Behav 35, 170178.

29.EB Roos , S Karvonen & O Rahkonen (2004) Lifestyles, social background and eating patterns of 15-year-old boys and girls in Finland. J Youth Stud 7, 331349.

30.J Stang , A Kong , M Story et al. (2007) Food and weight-related patterns and behaviors of Hmong adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 936941.

31.Y Terry-McElrath , P O’Malley , J Delva et al. (2009) The school food environment and student body mass index and food consumption: 2004 to 2007 national data. J Adolesc Health 45, 3 Suppl., S45S56.

34.MC Gulliford , D Mahabir , C Nunes et al. (2005) Self-administration of a food security scale by adolescents: item functioning, socio-economic position and food intakes. Public Health Nutr 8, 853860.

35.A McClain , C Chappuis , S Nguyen-Rodriguez et al. (2009) Psychosocial correlates of eating behavior in children and adolescents: a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6, 54.

36.DP MacKinnon , AJ Fairchild & MS Fritz (2007) Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 58, 593614.

37.A Attorp , JE Scott , AC Yew et al. (2014) Associations between socioeconomic, parental and home environment factors and fruit and vegetable consumption of children in grades five and six in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Public Health 14, 150.

40.B Xie , FD Gilliland , Y-F Li et al. (2003) Effects of ethnicity, family income, and education on dietary intake among adolescents. Prev Med 36, 3040.

41.MM Fahlman , N McCaughtry , J Martin et al. (2010) Racial and socioeconomic disparities in nutrition behaviors: targeted interventions needed. J Nutr Educ Behav 42, 1016.

47.CR Browning & KA Cagney (2003) Moving beyond poverty: neighborhood structure, social processes, and health. J Health Soc Behav 44, 552571.

48.B Galobardes , M Shaw , D Lawlor et al. (2006) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 60, 712.

52.N Lien , C Friestad & K-I Klepp (2001) Adolescents’ proxy reports of parents’ socioeconomic status: how valid are they? J Epidemiol Community Health 55, 731737.

53.LE Aarø , AJ Flisher , S Kaaya et al. (2009) Parental education as an indicator of socioeconomic status: improving quality of data by requiring consistency across measurement occasions. Scand J Public Health 37, 1627.

54.J Wardle , K Robb & F Johnson (2002) Assessing socioeconomic status in adolescents: the validity of a home affluence scale. J Epidemiol Community Health 56, 595599.

55.M Wall , N Larson , A Forsyth et al. (2012) Patterns of obesogenic neighborhood features and adolescent weight: a comparison of statistical approaches. Am J Prev Med 42, e65e75.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: