Skip to main content
×
Home

A comparison of the fat composition and prices of margarines between 2002 and 2006, when new Canadian labelling regulations came into effect

  • Laurie Ricciuto (a1), Kevin Lin (a1) and Valerie Tarasuk (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To examine the effect of the new Canadian labelling regulations on the fat composition and prices of margarines.

Study design

A survey of all margarines sold in major supermarkets in the Greater Toronto area was conducted in 2006, and results were compared with those of a similar survey conducted in 2002. Average fat composition, proportion of ‘trans fat-free’ margarines and average prices of margarines were compared. A general linear model procedure was used to compare the relationship between price and fat composition in 2002 and 2006.

Results

Average amounts of trans fatty acids (TFA) and MUFA decreased, while average amounts of PUFA increased significantly from 2002 to 2006. The proportion of margarines with less than 0·2 g TFA/10 g serving rose significantly from 31 % in 2002 to 69 % in 2006. Margarines lower in TFA on average cost significantly more than margarines with greater amounts of these fats, and this relationship appeared stronger in 2006 relative to 2002.

Conclusions

There is evidence of reductions in TFA in margarines since new labelling regulations came into effect in Canada; however, TFA reductions appeared to be restricted to higher-priced margarines. Results suggest that voluntary approaches (i.e. manufacturer incentives via labelling) to reduce population intakes of TFA will yield little changes in TFA content of low-cost products and thus may have limited benefit for lower-income groups, who are at higher risk of heart disease.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A comparison of the fat composition and prices of margarines between 2002 and 2006, when new Canadian labelling regulations came into effect
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A comparison of the fat composition and prices of margarines between 2002 and 2006, when new Canadian labelling regulations came into effect
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A comparison of the fat composition and prices of margarines between 2002 and 2006, when new Canadian labelling regulations came into effect
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Email Valerie.tarasuk@utoronto.ca
References
Hide All
1. Health Canada (2003) Nutrition Labelling Toolkit for Educators. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpfb-dgpsa/onpp-bppn/labelling-etiquetage/toolkit_educators_e.html (accessed September 2007).
2. Australia New Zealand Food Authority (2001) Overview of Food Labelling. http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/thecode/assistanceforindustry/userguides/overviewoffoodlabell1267.cfm (accessed September 2007).
3.Balasubramanian SK & Cole C (2002) Consumers’ search and use of nutrition information: the challenge and promise of the Nutrition Labelling and Education Act. J Marketing 66, 112127.
4. Food Standards Agency (1999) Guidance Notes on Nutrition Labelling. http://www.food.gov.uk/foodlabelling/ (accessed September 2007).
5. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General (2006) Labelling: competitiveness, consumer information and better regulation for the EU. A DG SANCO Consultative Document. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/labellingnutrition/betterregulation/competitiveness_consumer_info.pdf (accessed September 2008).
6.World Health Organization (2004) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva: WHO.
7.Derby B & Levy A (2001) Do food labels work? Gauging the effectiveness of food labels pre- and post-NLEA. In Handbook of Marketing and Society, pp. 372398 [PN Bloom and GT Gundlach, editors]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.Cowburn G & Stockley L (2004) Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 8, 2128.
9.Levy AS & Fein SB (1998) Consumers’ ability to perform tasks using nutrition labels. J Nutr Educ 30, 210217.
10.Roe B, Levy AS & Derby BM (1999) The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: results from FDA experimental data. J Public Policy Marketing 18, 89105.
11.Lang T & Heasman M (editors) (2004) The consumer culture. In Food Wars: The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets, pp. 184203. London: Earthscan.
12.Mathios A & Ippolito P (1999) Health claims in food advertising and labelling: disseminating nutrition information to consumers. In America’s Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences, pp. 189212 [E Frazao, editor]. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
13.Moorman C (1998) Market-level effects of information: competitive responses and consumer dynamics. J Marketing Res 35, 8298.
14.Frazao E & Allshouse J (1996) Size and Growth of the Nutritionally Improved Foods Market. Report no. AIB-723. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
15.Giskes K, Van Lenthe F, Brug J, Mackenbach J & Turrell G (2007) Socio-economic inequalities in food purchasing: the contribution of respondent-perceived and actual (objectively measured) price and availability of foods. Prev Med 45, 4148.
16.Hu FB, Manson JE & Willett WC (2001) Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 20, 519.
17.Kromhout D, Menotti A, Bloemberg B et al. (1995) Dietary saturated and trans fatty acids and cholesterol and 25-year mortality from coronary heart disease: the Seven Countries Study. Prev Med 24, 308315.
18.Oh K, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer M & Willett WC (2005) Dietary fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease among women: 20 years follow-up of the Nurses Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 161, 672679.
19.Stender S & Dyerberg J (2004) Influence of trans fatty acids on health. Ann Nutr Metab 48, 6166.
20.Eckel R, Borra S, Lichtenstein A & Yin-Piazza S; Trans Fat Conference Planning Group (2006) Understanding the complexity of trans fatty acid reduction in the American diet; American Heart Association Trans Fat Conference 2006: Report of the Trans Fat Conference Planning Group. Circulation 115, 22312246.
21. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (2006) Government supports initiatives to reduce trans fats in food. http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/newsroom/mediareleases/mediareleases2006/honchristopherpynemp3389.cfm (accessed June 2007).
22.Health Canada (2006) TRANSforming the Food Supply: Report of the Trans Fat Task Force. Ottawa: Health Canada.
23. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2004) 2003 Guide to Food Labelling and Advertising. Section 7.16 Fat Claims. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/labeti/guide/toce.shtml (accessed June 2007).
24. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2004) 2003 Guide to Food Labelling and Advertising. Section 5.4 Information in the Nutrition Facts Table. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/labeti/guide/ch5e.shtml#5.4 (accessed June 2007).
25.US Food and Drug Administration (2007) Federal Register Final Rule: Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition Labelling, Nutrient Content Claims, and Health Claims. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
26.Elias SL & Innis SM (2002) Bakery foods are the major dietary source of trans-fatty acids among pregnant women with diets providing 30 percent energy from fat. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 4651.
27. US Food and Drug Administration (2004) Revealing Trans Fats. http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2003/503_fats.html (accessed June 2007).
28.Ricciuto L, Ip H & Tarasuk V (2005) The relationship between price, amounts of saturated and trans fats, and nutrient content claims on margarines and oils. Can J Diet Pract Res 66, 252255.
29.Gale Research Inc. (2002) Market Share Reporter. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.
30.Gale Research Inc. (2006) Market Share Reporter 2006. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.
31.Canadian Grocer (2006) Who’s who 2006. Toronto, ON: Rogers Media Inc.
32. Health Canada (2008) Trans Fat Monitoring Program: Second Set of Monitoring Data. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/gras-trans-fats/tfa-age_sec-data_deux-donn-eng.php (accessed August 2008).
33. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (2004) 2003 Guide to Food Labelling and Advertising. Section 7.16 Fat Claims. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/labeti/guide/toce.shtml (accessed June 2007).
34.Wilkinson R (1996) Income distribution and health. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality, pp. 72109. London: Routledge.
35.Hitchman C, Christie I, Harrison M & Lang T (2002) Inconvenience Food: The Struggle to Eat Well on a Low Income. London: DEMOS.
36.Travers K (1996) The social organization of nutritional inequities. Soc Sci Med 43, 543553.
37.Turrell G & Kavanagh A (2006) Socio-economic pathways to diet: modelling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behaviour. Public Health Nutr 9, 375383.
38.Horton S & Campbell C (1990) Do the poor pay more for food? Food Market Commentary 11, 3339.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 179 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.