Skip to main content
×
Home

Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review

  • Gill Cowburn (a1) and Lynn Stockley (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

To explore published and unpublished research into consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling which is culturally applicable in Europe.

Design:

A systematic review undertaken between July 2002 and February 2003.

Results:

One hundred and three papers were identified that reported on consumer understanding or use of nutrition labelling, most originating from North America or northern Europe. Only a few studies (9%) were judged to be of high or medium–high quality. We found that reported use of nutrition labels is high but more objective measures suggest that actual use of nutrition labelling during food purchase may be much lower. Whether or not consumers can understand and use nutrition labelling depends on the purpose of the task. Available evidence suggests that consumers who do look at nutrition labels can understand some of the terms used but are confused by other types of information. Most appear able to retrieve simple information and make simple calculations and comparisons between products using numerical information, but their ability to interpret the nutrition label accurately reduces as the complexity of the task increases. The addition of interpretational aids like verbal descriptors and recommended reference values helps in product comparison and in putting products into a total diet context.

Conclusions:

Improvements in nutrition labelling could make a small but important contribution towards making the existing point-of-purchase environment more conducive to the selection of healthy choices. In particular, interpretational aids can help consumers assess the nutrient contribution of specific foods to the overall diet.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email gill.cowburn@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1Joint Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Food Standards Programme. Codex Alimentarius Food Labelling Complete Texts, revised 2001, Rome: FAO/WHO, 2001.
2Council Directive 90/496/EEC on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs of 24 September 1990. Official Journal of the European Communities L276 of October 1990. Luxembourg: European Commission, 1990; 40–4.
3The Food Labelling Regulations (UK). SI 1996 no.1449, as amended. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1996.
4Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). Guidance Notes of Nutrition Labelling. London: MAFF, 1994.
5US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guide to Nutrition Labelling and Education Act (NLEA) Requirements. Rockville, MD: FDA, 1994.
6Sibbald B. Canada's nutrition labels: a new world standard? Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003; 168(7): 887.
7Curran MA. Nutrition labelling: perspectives of a bi-national agency for Australia and New Zealand. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 11(2): S72–6.
8Tee ES, Tamin S, Ilyas R, Ramos A, Tan WL, Lai DK, et al. Current status of nutrition labelling and claims in the South-East Asian region: are we in harmony? Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 11(2): S80–6.
9Research Services Ltd. Nutrition Labelling Study. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, 1995.
10Food and Drink Federation (FDF)/Institute of Environmental Health Officers (IEHO). The FDF–IEHO National Food Safety Report. London: FDF/IEHO, 1993.
11Bureau Europeen des Unions de Consommateurs. Position Paper on the Labelling of Food. Brussels: Bureau Europeen des Unions de Consommateurs, 2001.
12Kafatos AG, Codrington CA, eds. Eurodiet Reports and Proceedings [special issue]. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4(2A): 265436.
13European Heart Network. Food, Nutrition and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in the European Union. Brussels: European Heart Network, 1998.
14Food Standards Agency (FSA), Food Advisory Committee. Review of Food Labelling 2001. London: FSA, 2001.
15NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Report Number 4. 2nd ed. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001.
17European Heart Network. A Systematic Review of the Research on Consumer Understanding of Nutrition Labelling. Brussels: European Heart Network, 2003.
18Black A, Rayner M (Coronary Prevention Group). Just Read the Label. London: The Stationery Office, 1992.
19Guthrie JF, Fox JJ, Cleveland LE, Welsh S. Who uses nutrition labeling, and what effects does label use have on diet quality? Journal of Nutrition Education 1995; 27(4): 163–72.
20Higginson C, Kirk TR, Rayner M, Draper S. How do consumers use nutrition label information? Nutrition and Food Science 2002; 32(4): 145–52.
21Higginson C, Rayner M, Draper S, Kirk TR. The nutrition label – which information is looked at? Nutrition and Food Science 2002; 32(3): 92–9.
22Levy A, Fein S. Consumers' ability to perform tasks using nutrition labels. Journal of Nutrition Education 1998; 30(4): 210–7.
23National Institute of Nutrition. Nutrition Labelling: Perceptions and Preferences of Canadians 9. Ontario: National Institute of Nutrition, 1999.
24Neuhouser ML, Kristal AR, Patterson RE. Use of food nutrition labels is associated with lower fat intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1999; 99(1): 4553.
25Paterson D, Zappelli R, Chalmers A. Food Labelling Issues – Consumer Qualitative Research. Canberra: Australia and New Zealand Food Authority, 2001.
26Wyn Thomas B, Boaz A, Rayner M. Food Labelling and Healthy Food Choices. Oxford: British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group, 1997.
27Byrd-Bredbenner C, Wong A, Cottee P. Consumer understanding of US and EU nutrition labels. British Food Journal 2000; 102(8): 615–29.
28Byrd-Bredbenner C, Alfieri L, Wong A, Cottee P. The inherent educational qualities of nutrition labels. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 2001; 29(3): 265–80.
29Byrd-Bredbenner C, Kiefer L. The ability of elderly women to perform Nutrition Facts label tasks and judge nutrient content claims. Journal of Nutrition for the Elderly 2000; 20(2): 2946.
30Li F, Miniard PW, Barone MJ. The facilitating influence of consumer knowledge on the effectiveness of daily value reference information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2002; 28(3): 425–36.
31Sullivan AD, Gottschall-Pass KT. Food label nutrition literacy: tool development and assessment. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association 1995; 56(2): 6872.
32Institute of Grocery Distribution (IGD). Voluntary Nutrition Labelling. Watford: IGD, 1998.
33Byrd-Bredbenner C. Designing a consumer friendly nutrition label. Journal of Nutrition Education 1994; 26: 180–90.
34Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd Putting the Consumer First. London: Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd, 1993.
35Food Standards Agency (FSA). Nutrition Labelling: Qualitative Research. London: FSA, 2001.
36Levy AS, Fein SB, Schucker RE. Nutrition labelling formats: performance and preference. Food Technology 1991; 116–21.
37Lewis CJ, Yetley EA. Focus group sessions on formats of nutrition labels. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1992; 92(1): 62–6.
38Mohr KG, Wyse BW, Hansen RG. Aiding consumer nutrition decisions: comparison of a graphical nutrient density labeling format with the current food labeling system. Home Economics Research Journal 1980; 8(3): 162–72.
39Rudd J. Aiding consumer nutrition decisions with the simple graphic label format. Home Economics Research Journal 1986; 14(3): 342–6.
40Byrd-Bredbenner C, Alfieri L, Kiefer L. The nutrition label knowledge and usage behaviours of women in the US. BNF Nutrition Bulletin 2000; 25: 315–22.
41Klopp P, MacDonald M. Nutrition labels: an exploratory study of consumer reasons for non-use. Journal of Consumer Affairs 1981; 15: 301–16.
42British Market Research Bureau. Consumer Attitudes to and Understanding of Nutrition Labelling: Quantitative Stage. London: Consumers' Association, 1985.
43Yeomans Y. Practical use of nutrition labels. BNF Nutrition Bulletin 1986; 11: 1222.
44European Commission Report of the Application of Directive 90/496/EEC on Nutrition Labelling for Foodstuffs. Brussels: European Commission, 2002.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 3788 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3864 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.