Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T18:56:11.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The consumption of rye bread and white bread as dimensions of health lifestyles in Finland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Ritva Prättälä*
National Public Health Institute (KTL), Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN-00300 Helsinki, Finland
Ville elasoja
National Public Health Institute (KTL), Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN-00300 Helsinki, Finland
Hannu Mykkänen
University of Kuopio, Department of Clinical Nutrition, PO Box 6, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
*Corresponding author: Email
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this research was to describe the variation in bread consumption within social classes and to link this consumption to health-related lifestyles in Finland from 1978 until 1998.


A cross-sectional survey on health-related behaviour and socio-demographic factors has been conducted annually since 1978.


Mailed questionnaire.


A random sample of 5000 Finns aged 15–64 years has been drawn annually. The response rate has varied from 84% to 68%.


The consumption of rye bread decreased, but among the female population a slight increase appeared in the 1990s. The consumption of rye bread was associated with a low educational level and a rural place of residence. White bread was consumed less than was rye bread. White bread was consumed more frequently by the less educated in urban areas. Contrary to white bread, the consumption of rye bread was not associated with smoking, exercise or alcohol consumption.


The traditional place of rye bread in the Finnish dietary pattern has remained rather constant. White bread consumption has been associated with an unhealthy lifestyle. As a result, those Finns who are concerned about their health avoid white bread but seem not to associate rye bread with a healthier lifestyle. In Finland, rye bread has a different image to the image of whole-grain or dark brown bread in many other western European countries.

Research Article
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001


1Pietinen, P, Rimm, EB, Korhonen, P, et al. Intake of dietary fiber and risk of coronary heart disease in a cohort of Finnish men, The AlphaTocopherol, BetaCarotene Cancer Prevention Study. Circulation 1996; 94: 2720–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2ECP Consensus Panel on Cereals and Cancer. Consensus meeting on cereals, fiber, and colorectal and breast cancers. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 1997; 6: 512–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Zhan, J-X, Hallmans, G, Landström, M, et al. Soy and rye inhibit the development of Dunning R3327 prostatic adenocarcinoma in rats. Cancer Lett. 1997; 114: 313–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4National Public Health Institute. The 1997 Dietary Survey of the Finnish market. Finnish Adults. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute, 1998.Google Scholar
5Hupkens, C, Knibbe, R, Drop, M. Social class differences in women's fat and fibre consumption. A cross-national study. Appetite 1997; 28: 131–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Blaxter, M. Health and Lifestyles. London and New York: Tavistock/Routledge, 1990; 113–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Mennell, S, Murcott, A, van Otterloo, A. The Sociology of Food: Eating, Diet and Culture. London: Sage Publications, 1992; 54–5.Google Scholar
8Roos, E. Social patterning of food behaviour among Finnish men and women.Doctoral Dissertation. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute, 1998.Google Scholar
9Statens ernaeringsråd. Norkost 1993–94. Landsomfattende kostholdsundersokelse blant menn og kvinner i alderen 16–79 år [National Dietary Survey among 16–79-year-old Men and Women; in Norwegian]. Oslo: Statens ernaeringsråd, 1997.Google Scholar
10Kleemola, P, Roos, E, Pietinen, P. Dietary changes by the level of education. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen Aikakauslehti 1996; 33: 916 [in Finnish with English abstract].Google Scholar
11Roos, E, Prättälä, R, Lahelma, E, Kleemola, P, Pietinen, P. Modern and healthy?: socioeconomic differences in the quality of diet. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 50: 753–60.Google ScholarPubMed
12Karisto, A, Prättälä, R, Berg, M-A. The good, the bad and the ugly. Differences and changes in health related lifestyles. In: Kjaernes, U, Holm, L, Ekström, M, Fürst, E, Prättälä, R. Regulating Markets – Regulating People. On Food and Nutrition Policy. Oslo: Novus Press, 1993; 185204.Google Scholar
13Hulshof, K, Löwik, M, Kok, F, Wedel, M, Brants, A, Hermus, Rten Hoor, F. Diet and other life-style factors in different socio-economic groups. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991; 45: 441–50.Google Scholar
14Lahelma, E, Rahkonen, O, Berg, M-A, Helakorpi, S, Prättälä, R, Puska, P, Uutela, A. Changes in health status and health behaviour among Finnish adults 1978–1993. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1997; 23(Suppl. 3): 8590.Google ScholarPubMed
15Laurila, E. Consumption in Finnish Economy in the Years 1900–1975. Helsinki: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, 1985; 117 [in Finnish].Google Scholar
16Roine, P. The amounts and adequacy of food rations in Finland during 1941–46. Maataloustieteellinen Aikakauskirja 1948; 9: 89.Google Scholar
17 Finnish Ministry of Forestry and Agriculture. Food Balance Sheets 1997 [Online]. Available at Scholar
18Uusitalo, U, Pietinen, P, Leino, U. Food and Nutrient Intake among Adults in East and Southwest Finland – A Dietary Survey of the Finmonica Project in 1982. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute, 1987.Google Scholar
19Kleemola, P, Virtanen, M, Pietinen, P. The 1992 Dietary Survey of Finnish Adults. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute, 1994.Google Scholar
20Helasoja, V. Postikyselyaineiston ulkoisesta luotettavuudesta, Aikuisväestön terveyskäyttäyminen -tutkimuksen vastaajajoukon edustavuus ja alkoholinkulutustietojen yleistettävyys [The external validity of a postal survey, the representativeness and feasibility of alcohol consumption information of AVTK survey]. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 1998 [in Finnish].Google Scholar
21Prättälä, R, Helasoja, V, and the FINBALT group. FINBALT HEALTH MONITOR – Feasibility of a Collaborative System for Monitoring Health Behaviour in Finland and the Baltic Countries. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
22SPSS, Inc. SPSS Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc., 1990.Google Scholar
23Helakorpi, S, Uutela, A, Prättälä, R, Puska, P. Health Behaviour among Finnish Adult Population, Spring 1999. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
24Prevost, AT, Whichelow, MJ, Cox, BD. Longitudinal dietary changes between 1984–5 and 1991–2 in British adults: association with socio-demographic, lifestyle and health factors. Br. J. Nutr. 1997; 78: 873–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Johansson, L, Thelle, D, Solvoll, K, Bjoerneboe, , Drevon, Ch. Healthy dietary habits in relation social determinants and lifestyle factors. Br. J. Nutr. 1999; 81: 211–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed