Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women

  • Adam Drewnowski (a1), Susan Ahlstrom Henderson (a2), Alisa Levine (a2) and Clayton Hann (a2)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

To investigate links between taste responses, self-reported food preferences and selected dietary outcomes in young women.

Methods:

Subjects were 159 women, with a mean age of 27.0 years. Taste responses were measured using aqueous solutions of 6−n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and sucrose. All subjects completed a 171-item food preference checklist, using nine-point category scales. Food preference data were reduced using principal components factor analyses, with the internal consistency of factor-based subscales established using Cronbach's alpha. Dietary intakes, available for a subset of 87 women, were based on 3 days of food records. Estimated intakes of carbohydrate, fibre and β-carotene were the key dietary outcome variables.

Results:

Genetically-mediated sensitivity to the bitter taste of PROP was associated with reduced preferences for Brussels sprouts, cabbage, spinach and coffee beverages. Higher preferences for sucrose in water were associated with increased preferences for sweet desserts. Food preferences, in turn, were associated with measures of current diet. Reduced acceptability of vegetables and fruits was associated with lower estimated intakes of carbohydrate, fibre and β-carotene.

Conclusions:

Taste responses to sucrose and PROP were predictive of some food preferences. Food preferences, in turn, were associated with food consumption patterns. Given that taste responsiveness to PROP is an inherited trait, there may be further links between genetic taste markers, eating habits and the selection of healthful diets.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email adamdrew@u.washington.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2 E Kennedy , L Meyers , W Layden . The 1995 dietary guidelines for Americans: an overview. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1996; 96: 234–7.

6 S Havas , J Heimendinger , K Reynolds , Five a day for better health: a new research initiative. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1994; 94: 32–6.

9 A Drewnowski . Taste preferences and food intake. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997; 17: 237–53.

10 A Drewnowski , SA Henderson , AB Shore . Genetic sensitivity to 6−n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes. Chem. Senses 1997; 22: 2737.

11 P Rozin , TA Vollmecke . Food likes and dislikes. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1986; 6: 433–56.

13 EV Glanville , AR Kaplan . Food preferences and sensitivity of taste for bitter compounds. Nature 1965; 205: 851–3.

15 ML Pelchat , S Danowski . A possible genetic association between PROP-tasting and alcoholism. Physiol. Behav. 1992; 51: 1261–6.

16 AF Fox . The relationship between chemical constitution and taste. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1932; 18: 115–20.

17 H Kalmus . Genetics of taste. In: LM Beidler , ed. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1971; 165–79.

18 LM Bartoshuk . The biological basis of food perception and acceptance. Food Qual. Prefer. 1993; 4: 2132.

19 JF Gent , LM Bartoshuk . Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6−n-propylthiouracil. Chem. Senses 1983; 7: 265–72.

21 A Drewnowski , SA Henderson , AB Shore , A Barratt-Fornell . Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet. Physiol. Behav. 1997; 62: 649–55.

23 LM Bartoshuk , VB Duffy , IJ Miller . PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol. Behav. 1994; 56: 1165–71

24 WC Boyd . Taste reactions to antithyroid substances. Science 1950; 112: 153.

27 GD Akella , SA Henderson , A Drewnowski . Sensory acceptance of Japanese green tea and soy products is linked to genetic sensitivity to 6−n-propylthiouracil. Nutr. Cancer 1997; 29: 146–51.

28 WJ Craig . Phytochemicals: guardians of our health. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1997; 97: S199204.

30 RA Frank , NJ van der Klaauw . The contribution of chemosensory factors to individual differences in reported food preferences. Appetite 1994; 22: 101–23.

32 A Niewind , M Krondl , M Shrott . Genetic influences on the selection of Brassica vegetables by elderly individuals. Nutr. Res. 1988; 8: 1320.

37 AW Logue , ME Smith . Predictors of food preferences in adult humans. Appetite 1986; 7: 109–25.

38 KA Steinmetz , JD Potter . Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1966; 96: 1027–39.

41 F Lucas , F Bellisle . The measurement of food preferences in humans; do taste and spit tests predict consumption? Physiol. Behav. 1987; 39: 739–43.

42 A Drewnowski . Taste and food preferences in human obesity. In: ED Capaldi , TL Powley , eds. Taste, Experience and Feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1990; 227–40.

43 J Rodin , HR Moskowitz , GA Bray . Relationship between obesity, weight loss and taste responsiveness. Physiol. Behav. 1976; 17: 391–7.

45 GR Fenwick , RK Heaney , WJ Mulling . Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1983; 18: 123201.

46 M Jerzsa-Latta , M Krondl , P Coleman . Use and perceived attributes of cruciferous vegetables in terms of genetically-mediated taste sensitivity. Appetite 1990; 15: 127–34.

47 A Drewnowski . From asparagus to zucchini: mapping cognitive space for vegetable names. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1996; 15: 1147–53.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: