Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluating the impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on breast-feeding rates: a multi-state analysis

  • Summer Sherburne Hawkins (a1), Ariel Dora Stern (a2), Christopher F Baum (a3) (a4) and Matthew W Gillman (a5)

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) on breast-feeding initiation and duration overall and according to maternal education.

Design

Quasi-experimental study using data from five states (Alaska, Maine, Nebraska, Ohio, Washington) that participated in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 1999 to 2009. Using differences-in-differences models that included year and hospital fixed effects, we compared rates of breast-feeding initiation and duration (any and exclusive breast-feeding for ≥4 weeks) before and after BFHI accreditation between mothers who gave birth in hospitals that were accredited or became accredited and mothers from matched non-BFHI facilities. We stratified analyses into lower and higher education groups.

Setting

Thirteen BFHI hospitals and nineteen matched non-BFHI facilities across five states in the USA.

Subjects

Mothers (n 11 723) who gave birth in BFHI hospitals and mothers (n 13 604) from nineteen matched non-BFHI facilities.

Results

Although we did not find overall differences in breast-feeding initiation between birth facilities that received BFHI accreditation compared with non-Baby-Friendly facilities (adjusted coefficient = 0·024; 95 % CI −0·00, 0·51), breast-feeding initiation increased by 3·8 percentage points among mothers with lower education who delivered in Baby-Friendly facilities (P = 0·05), but not among mothers with higher education (adjusted coefficient = 0·002; 95 % CI −0·04, 0·05). BFHI accreditation also increased exclusive breast-feeding for ≥4 weeks by 4·5 percentage points (P = 0·02) among mothers with lower education who delivered in BFHI facilities.

Conclusions

By increasing breast-feeding initiation and duration among mothers with lower education, the BFHI may reduce socio-economic disparities in breast-feeding.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Evaluating the impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on breast-feeding rates: a multi-state analysis
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Evaluating the impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on breast-feeding rates: a multi-state analysis
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Evaluating the impact of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on breast-feeding rates: a multi-state analysis
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email summer.hawkins@bc.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

This work was carried out when Dr S.S. Hawkins was based at Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Grummer-Strawn, LM & Shealy, KR (2009) Progress in protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding: 1984–2009. Breastfeed Med 4, Suppl. 1, S31S39.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Breastfeeding Report Card – United States, 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2012BreastfeedingReportCard.pdf (accessed November 2012).
3. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding (2012) Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 129, e827e841.
4. Taveras, EM, Gillman, MW, Kleinman, K et al. (2010) Racial/ethnic differences in early-life risk factors for childhood obesity. Pediatrics 125, 686695.
5. US Department of Health and Human Services (2011) The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. Washington, DC: US DHHS.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Progress in increasing breastfeeding and reducing racial/ethnic differences – United States, 2000–2008 births. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62, 7780.
7. DiGirolamo, AM, Grummer-Strawn, LM & Fein, SB (2008) Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics 122, Suppl. 2, S43S49.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Racial and ethnic differences in breastfeeding initiation and duration, by state – National Immunization Survey, United States, 2004–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59, 327334.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) mPINC results. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/mpinc/results.htm (accessed July 2012).
10. World Health Organization & UNICEF (1989) Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding: The Special Role of Maternity Services. Geneva: WHO.
11. Baby-Friendly USA (2013) Home page. http://www.babyfriendlyusa.org (accessed March 2013).
12. Saadeh, R & Casanovas, C (2009) Implementing and revitalizing the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Food Nutr Bull 30, 2 Suppl., S225S229.
13. White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity (2010) Solving the problem of childhood obesity within a generation: The White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity Report to the President. http://www.letsmove.gov/sites/letsmove.gov/files/TaskForce_on_Childhood_Obesity_May2010_FullReport.pdf (accessed June 2012).
14. US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Healthy People 2020 Objective Topic Areas and Page Numbers. http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/pdfs/HP2020objectives.pdf (accessed October 2012).
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Hospital support for breastfeeding: preventing obesity begins in hospitals. http://www.cdc.gov/VitalSigns/BreastFeeding/ (accessed July 2012).
16. Venancio, SI, Saldiva, SR, Escuder, MM et al. (2012) The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative shows positive effects on breastfeeding indicators in Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health 66, 914918.
17. Braun, ML, Giugliani, ER, Soares, ME et al. (2003) Evaluation of the impact of the baby-friendly hospital initiative on rates of breastfeeding. Am J Public Health 93, 12771279.
18. Kramer, MS, Chalmers, B, Hodnett, ED et al. (2001) Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA 285, 413420.
19. Cattaneo, A & Buzzetti, R (2001) Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the baby friendly hospital initiative. BMJ 323, 13581362.
20. Merten, S, Dratva, J & Ackermann-Liebrich, U (2005) Do baby-friendly hospitals influence breastfeeding duration on a national level? Pediatrics 116, e702e708.
21. Bartington, S, Griffiths, LJ, Tate, AR et al. (2006) Are breastfeeding rates higher among mothers delivering in Baby Friendly accredited maternity units in the UK? Int J Epidemiol 35, 11781186.
22. Brodribb, W, Kruske, S & Miller, YD (2013) Baby-friendly hospital accreditation, in-hospital care practices, and breastfeeding. Pediatrics 131, 685692.
23. Merewood, A, Mehta, SD, Chamberlain, LB et al. (2005) Breastfeeding rates in US Baby-Friendly hospitals: results of a national survey. Pediatrics 116, 628634.
24. Rosenberg, KD, Stull, JD, Adler, MR et al. (2008) Impact of hospital policies on breastfeeding outcomes. Breastfeed Med 3, 110116.
25. Murray, EK, Ricketts, S & Dellaport, J (2007) Hospital practices that increase breastfeeding duration: results from a population-based study. Birth 34, 202211.
26. Perrine, CG, Scanlon, KS, Li, R et al. (2012) Baby-friendly hospital practices and meeting exclusive breastfeeding intention. Pediatrics 130, 5460.
27. Declercq, E, Labbok, MH, Sakala, C et al. (2009) Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed. Am J Public Health 99, 929935.
28. Philipp, BL, Merewood, A, Miller, LW et al. (2001) Baby-friendly hospital initiative improves breastfeeding initiation rates in a US hospital setting. Pediatrics 108, 677681.
29. Philipp, BL, Malone, KL, Cimo, S et al. (2003) Sustained breastfeeding rates at a US Baby-Friendly hospital. Pediatrics 112, e234e236.
30. Merewood, A, Patel, B, Newton, KN et al. (2007) Breastfeeding duration rates and factors affecting continued breastfeeding among infants born at an inner-city US Baby-Friendly hospital. J Hum Lact 23, 157164.
31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). http://www.cdc.gov/prams/ (accessed May 2010).
32. World Health Organization (1981) International Code of Marketing Breast-milk Substitutes. Geneva: WHO.
33. Baum, CF (2009) Locating nearest neighbors with Mata. In An Introduction to Stata Programming, pp. 327331. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
34. Li, R, Scanlon, KS & Serdula, MK (2005) The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice. Nutr Rev 63, 103110.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed