Skip to main content
×
Home

Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake

  • Megan A Mccrory (a1), Cheryl L Hajduk (a1) and Susan B Roberts (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

To review existing methods and illustrate the use of a new, simple method for identifying inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake (rEI).

Design:

Comparison of rEI with energy requirements estimated by using total energy expenditure predicted (pTEE) from age, weight, height and sex using a previously published equation. Propagation of error calculations was performed and cut-offs for excluding rEI at plus or minus two standard deviations (±2 SD) and ±1 SD for the agreement between rEI and pTEE were established.

Setting:

Dietary survey in a US national cohort: the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII), 1994–96.

Subjects:

Men and non-pregnant, non-lactating women aged 21–45 years in the CSFII who provided two multiple-pass 24-hour recalls, height and weight(n = 3755).

Results:

Average rEI was 77% of pTEE in men, and 64% of pTEE in women. Calculated cut-offs were rEI <40% or >160% of pTEE (±2 SD) and <70% or >130% of pTEE (±1 SD), respectively. Use of only the ±1 SD cut-offs, not the ±2 SD cut-offs, resulted in a relationship between rEI and body weight similar to what was expected (based on an independently calculated relationship between rEI and measured TEE). Exclusion of rEI outside either the ±2 SD (11% of subjects) or ±1 SD (57% of subjects) cut-offs did not affect mean reported macronutrient intakes, but did markedly affect relationships between dietary composition and body mass index.

Conclusions:

When examining relationships between diet and health, use of ±1 SD cut-offs may be preferable to ±2 SD cut-offs for excluding inaccurate dietary reports.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Procedures for screening out inaccurate reports of dietary energy intake
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email mmccrory@hnrc.tufts.edu
References
Hide All
1Schoeller Da, Bandini LG, Dietz WH. Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1990; 68: 941–9.
2Schoeller DA. Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report. Metabolism. 1995; 44: 1822.
3Bingham SA, Cassidy A, Cole TJ, Welch A, Runswick SA, Black AE, et al. Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. Br. J. Nutr. 1995; 73: 531–50.
4Briefel RR, Sempos CT, McDowell MA, Chien SC-, Alaimo K. Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65(Suppl.): 1203S–9S.
5Lafay L, Basdevant A, Charles MA, Vray M, Balkau B, Borys JM, et al. Determinants and nature of dietary underreporting in a free-living population: the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante (FLVS) study. Int. J. Obes. 1997; 21: 567–73.
6Adams SJ. The dietary intake of people with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM): how valid is self-reported intake?. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 1998; 11: 295306.
7Voss S, Kroke A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Boeing H. Is macronutrient composition of dietary intake data affected by underreporting? Result from the EPIC–Potsdam Study. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 52: 119–26.
8Pomerleau J, Ostbye T, Bright-See E. Potential underreporting of energy intake in the Ontario Health Survey and its relationship with nutrient and food intakes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 15: 553–7.
9Samaras K, Kelly PJ, Campbell LV. Dietary underreporting is prevalent in middle-aged British women and is not related to adiposity (percentage body fat). Int. J. Obes. 1999; 23: 881–8.
10Goris AHC, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR. Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 71: 130–4.
11Saltzman E, Roberts SB. The role of energy expenditure in energy regulation: findings from a decade of research. Nutr. Rev. 1995; 53: 209–20.
12Bray G, Popkin BM. Dietary fat intake does affect obesity!. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 68: 1157–73.
13Roberts SB, Pi-Sunyer FX, Dreher M, Hahn R, Hill JO, Kleinman RE, et al. Physiology of fat replacement and fat reduction: effects of dietary fat and fat substitutes on energy regulation. Nutr. Rev. 1998; 56: S29–49.
14Willett WC. Dietary fat and obesity: an unconvincing relation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 68: 1149–50.
15Prentice AM, Cole TJ. The Doubly-Labelled Water Method for Measuring Energy Expenditure. Technical Recommendations for Use in Humans: A Consensus Report. Vienna: Section of Nutritional and Health-Related Environmental Studies, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Dietary Energy Consultancy Group, 1990.
16Speakman JR. Doubly Labelled Water: Theory and Practice, 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall. 1997.
17Black AE. The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 54: 395404.
18US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. CSFII/DHKS 1994–96 Data Set and Documentation: The 1994–96 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the 1994–96 Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1998; data tables.
19Beaton GH, Milner J, Corey P, McGuire V, Cousins M, Stewart E, et al. Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1979; 32: 2546–9.
20Black AE. Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int. J. Obes. 2000; 24: 1119–30.
21Marr JW, Heady JA. Within- and between-person variation in dietary surveys: number of days needed to classify individuals. Hum. Nutr. Appl. Nutr. 1986; 40A: 347–64.
22Nelson M, Black AE, Morris JA, Cole TJ. Between- and within-subject variation in nutrient intake from infancy to old age: estimating the number of days required to rank dietary intakes with desired precision. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1989; 50: 155–67.
23Prentice RL. Measurement error and results from analytic epidemiology: dietary fat and breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 1738–47.
24Paeratakul S, Popkin BM, Kohlmeier L, Hertz-Picciotto I, Guo X, Edwards LJ. Measurement error in dietary data: implications for the epidemiologic study of the diet–disease relationship. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 52: 722–7.
25Prentice AM, Black AE, Coward WA, Davies HL, Goldberg GR, Murgatroyd PR, et al. High levels of energy expenditure in obese women. Br. Med. J. 1986; 292: 983–7.
26Bandini LG, Schoeller DA, Cyr HN, Dietz WH. Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990; 52: 421–5.
27Lichtman SW, Pisarska K, Berman ER, Pestone M, Dowling H, Offenbacher E, et al. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992; 327: 1893–8.
28Bathalon GP, Tucker KL, Hays NP, Vinken AG, Greenberg AS, McCrory MA, et al. Psychological measures of eating behavior and the accuracy of 3 common dietary assessment methods in healthy postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 71: 739–45.
29Goris AHC, Westerterp KR. Underreporting of habitual food intake is explained by undereating in highly motivated lean women. J. Nutr. 1999; 129: 878–82.
30Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J. Psychosom. Res. 1985; 29: 7183.
31Pryer JA, Vrijheid M, Nichols R, Kiggins M, Elliott P. Who are the ‘low energy reporters’ in the Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults?. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26: 146–54.
32Johnson RK, Soultanakis RP, Matthews DE. Literacy and body fatness are associated with underreporting of energy intake in US low-income women using the multiple-pass 24-hour recall: a doubly labeled water study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998; 98: 1136–40.
33Braam LA, Ocké MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Seidell JC. Determinants of obesity-related underreporting of energy intake. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998; 147: 1081–6.
34Kretsch MJ, Fong AKH, Green MW. Behavioral and body size correlates of energy intake underreporting by obese and normal-weight women. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999; 99: 300–6.
35Tomoyasu NJ, Toth MJ, Poehlman ET. Misreporting of total energy intake in older men and women. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1999; 47: 710–5.
36Mennen LI, Jackson M, Cade J, Mbanya JC, Lafay L, Sharma S. Underreporting of energy intake in four populations of African origin. Int. J. Obes. 2000; 24: 882–7.
37Macdiarmid J, Blundell J. Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of under-reporting. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1998; 11: 231–53.
38Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, et al. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991; 45: 569–81.
39Black AE, Coward WA, Cole TJ, Prentice AM. Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: an analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 50: 7292.
40Black AE, Goldberg GR, Jebb SA, Livingstone MBE, Cole TJ, Prentice AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991; 45: 583–99.
41Warwick PM, Baines J. Energy expenditure in free-living smokers and nonsmokers: comparison between factorial, intake-balance, and doubly labeled water measures. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 63: 1521.
42FAO/WHO/UNU. Energy and Protein Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1965.
43Vinken AG, Bathalon GP, Sawaya AL, Dallal GE, Tucker KL, Roberts SB. Equations for predicting the energy requirements of healthy adults aged 18–81 y. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 69: 920–6.
44Shetty PS, Henry CJK, Black AE, Prentice AM. Energy requirements of adults: an update on basal metabolic rates (BMRs) and physical activity levels (PALs). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 50(Suppl. 1): S11–23.
45Roberts SB, Heyman MB, Evans WJ, Fuss P, Tsay R, Young VR. Dietary energy requirements of young adult men, determined by using the doubly labeled water method. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991; 54: 499505.
46Roberts SB, Young VR, Fuss P, Heyman MB, Fiatarone M, Dallal GE, et al. What are the dietary energy needs of elderly adults?. Int. J. Obes. 1992; 16: 969–76.
47Prentice AM, Black AE, Coward WA, Cole TJ. Energy expenditure in overweight and obese adults in affluent societies: an analysis of 319 doubly-labelled water measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 50: 93–7.
48Goldberg GR. From individual variation in energy intakes…to variations in energy requirements and adaptations to them. Br. J. Nutr. 1997; 78(Suppl. 2): S81–94.
49Macdiarmid JI, Vail A, Cade JE, Blundell JE. The sugar–fat relationship revisited: differences in consumption between men and women of varying BMI. Int. J. Obes. 1998; 22: 1053–61.
50Stallone DD, Brunner EJ, Bingham SA, Marmot MG. Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: the influence of reporting bias on apparent socioeconomic variation in nutrient intakes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: 815–25.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 209 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 310 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.