Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T20:51:35.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Designing oral participation in Second Life – a comparative study of two language proficiency courses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Mats Deutschmann
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, Mid Sweden University, 871 88 Härnösand, Sweden (email: mats.deutschmann@miun.se)
Luisa Panichi
Affiliation:
Centro Linguistico Interdipartimentale, Università di Pisa, Via Santa Maria 36, 56126 Pisa, Italy (email: panichi@cli.unipi.it)
Judith Molka-Danielsen
Affiliation:
Molde University College, Postboks 2110, 6402 Molde, Norway (email: j.molka-danielsen@himolde.no)

Abstract

The following paper presents two stages of an action research project involving two oral proficiency courses held in the virtual world Second Life. Course 1 was conducted during the Autumn of 2007. Based on the experiences of this course, we redesigned many aspects of it in order to improve student activity in terms of oral participation and gave the course again in Spring 2008. By analysing the recordings of four 90-minute sessions, two from each course, we were able to measure student participation based on floor space, turn lengths and turn-taking patterns, and in the study we discuss how different changes in design may have contributed to more favourable outcomes. Results seem to indicate that meaning focussed task design, which involves authenticity and collaborative elements, has a direct impact on learner participation and engagement. Furthermore, our results seem to suggest that technical and social initiations into a complex environment such as SL are important factors that have to be worked into the course design.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chanier, T., Vetter, A., Betbeder, M.-L.Reffay, C. (2006) Retrouver le chemin de la parole en environnement audio-graphique synchrone. In: Dejean-Thircuir, C. and Mangenot, F. (eds.), Les échanges en ligne dans l’apprentissage et la formation. Le Français dans le Monde, Recherche et applications, 40: 139150. http://edutice.archives-ouvertes.fr/edutice-00084388Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2000) Innovative language learning: achieving the vision. ReCALL, 13(1): 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciekanski, M.Chanier, T. (2008) Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment. ReCALL, 20(2): 162182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colpaert, J. (2006) Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3): 477497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conole, G. (2008) Listening to the learner voice: The ever changing landscape of technology use for language students. ReCALL, 20(2): 124140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erard, M. (2007) A Boon to Second Life Language Schools – New technology will allow high-quality audio in a virtual world. Technology Review, 10-04-2007. http://www.technologyreview.com/communications/18510/page1/Google Scholar
Felix, U. (2003) Pedagogy on the line: Identifying and closing the missing links. In: Felix, U. (ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 147170.Google Scholar
Hampel, R. (2003) Theoretical perspectives and new practices in audio-graphic conferencing for language learning. ReCALL, 15(1): 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R. (2006) Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1): 105121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R.Baber, E. (2003) Using internet-based audio-graphic and video conferencing for language teaching and learning. In: Felix, U. (ed.), Language Learning Online: Towards Best Practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 171191.Google Scholar
Hampel, R.Hauck, M. (2004) Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1): 6682.Google Scholar
Hauck, M.Hampel, R. (2005) The challenges of implementing online tuition in distance language courses: Task design and tutor role. In: Holmberg, B., Shelley, M. A. and White, C. (eds.), Languages and Distance Education: evolution and change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 258277.Google Scholar
Hauck, M.Youngs, B. L. (2008) Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: the impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2): 87124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, B., Owen, D.van Veen, K. (2006) Working on educational research methods with Masters students in an international online learning community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4): 577603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I. (2001) Conversation and Technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Jauregi, K.Bañados, E. (2008) Virtual interaction through video-web communication: A step towards enriching and internationalizing language learning programs. ReCALL, 20(2): 183207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. M.Youngs, B. L. (2006) Teacher Preparation for Online Language Instruction. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher Education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 267280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R.Warschauer, M. (2000) Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In: Warschauer, M. and Kern, R. (eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 119.Google Scholar
Koenraad, T. (2008) How can 3D Virtual Worlds contribute to language education? Focus on the Language Village format. http://api.ning.com/files/-aLFnBFMgsbkiY0VMPOjIN1FkA0XBgwpNHFAh-ChFJ-9tpInDtdRmbhZCzFBWXGd*7MJbyUkJudaD*7qqocEaXrW8umBawAn/worldcallpdf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1987) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. London: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
Lamy, M. (2004) Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16(2): 520538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskill, C. (1999) Computers as Tools for Sociocollaborative Language Learning. In: Cameron, K. (ed.), Computer assisted language learning (CALL): media, design and applications. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 141162.Google Scholar
Molka-Danielsen, J., Carter, B. W., Richardson, D. Jæger, B. (forthcoming) Teaching and Learning Affectively within a Virtual Campus. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organization, Special Issue: Toward Virtual Universities..Google Scholar
Molka-Danielsen, J., Richardson, D., Deutschmann, M.Carter, B. (2007) Teaching Languages in a Virtual World. In: Habib, L. (ed.), NOKOBIT 2007. Trondheim: Tapir, 97110.Google Scholar
Nardi, H. (2006) Strangers and Friends: Collaborative Play in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örngren Berglund, T. (2006) Att mötas online: Muntliga realtidsträffar i nätverket ITAS. In: Svensson, P. (ed) Från vision till praktik: Språkutbildning och informationsteknik. Stockholm: Nätuniversitetet.Google Scholar
Panichi, L., Deutschmann, M. Molka-Danielsen, J. (2008) Virtual reality, real engagement? Exploring engagement in Second Life language-learning environments. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the Association of Language Awareness. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 26th–29th June.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. (2006) Learner Interaction Management in an Avatar and Chat-based Virtual World. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1): 79103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, G. (2004) E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwienhorst, K. (1998) The “third place”: virtual reality applications for second language learning. ReCALL, 10(1): 118126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Second Life English Community. http://slenglish.ning.com/Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2005) English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 59: 339341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2007) English as a lingua franca and communities of practice. In: Volk-Birke, S. and Lippert, J. (eds.), Anglistentag 2006 Halle Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 307318.Google Scholar
Stevens, V. (2006) Second Life in Education and Language Learning. TESL-EJ, 10(3).Google Scholar
Stockwell, G. (2007) A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2): 105120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, P. (2003) Virtual worlds as arenas for language learning. In: Felix, U. (ed.), Language learning online: towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 123142.Google Scholar
Svensson, P. (2004) Dispelling the Myth of the Real in Educational Technology. Paper presented at the Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Toyoda, E.Harrison, R. (2002) Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology, 6: 8299.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2004) The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: a Sociocultural Perspective. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicker, H. (no date) Language Teaching Gains Second Life: Virtual Worlds Offer New Methods to Teach Languages. Omniglot. http://www.omniglot.com/language/articles/secondlife.phpGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1997) Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4): 470481.Google Scholar
White, C. (2003) Language Learning in Distance Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar