Skip to main content Accessibility help

The revision theory of resurrection



A powerful argument against the resurrection of the body is based on the premise that all resurrection theories violate natural laws. We counter this argument by developing a fully naturalistic resurrection theory. We refer to it as the revision theory of resurrection (RTR). Since Hick's replica theory is already highly naturalistic, we use Hick's theory as the basis for the RTR. According to Hick, resurrection is the recreation of an earthly body in another universe. The recreation is a resurrection counterpart. We show that the New Testament supports the idea of resurrection counterparts. The RTR asserts that you are a node in a branching tree of increasingly perfect resurrection counterparts. These ever better counterparts live in increasingly perfect resurrection universes. We give both theological arguments and an empirical argument for the RTR.



Hide All
Baltimore, J. (2006) ‘Got to have soul’, Religious Studies, 42, 417430.
Barrow, J. & Tipler, F. (1986) The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (New York NY: Oxford University Press).
Bynum, C. (1995) The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336 (New York NY: Columbia University Press).
Corcoran, K. (2001) ‘Physical persons and postmortem survival without temporal gaps’, in idem (ed.) Soul, Body, and Survival (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press), 201217.
Corcoran, K. (2006) ‘I'm no soul, man: a response to Baltimore’, Religious Studies, 42, 431437.
Coughlan, M. (1987) ‘Must God create only the best possible world?’, Sophia, 26, 1519.
Dilley, F. (1983) ‘Resurrection and the “Replica objection”’, Religious Studies, 19, 459474.
Fales, E. (1994) ‘Divine freedom and the choice of a world’, International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 35, 6588.
Flew, A. (1976) The Presumption of Atheism (New York NY: Harper & Row).
Forrest, P. (1981) ‘The problem of evil: two neglected defences’, Sophia, 20, 4954.
Forrest, P. (1995) God without the Supernatural: A Defence of Scientific Theism (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).
French, P. (1982) ‘The survival of my counterpart’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 20, 5360.
Guth, A. H. & Steinhardt, P. J. (1984) ‘The inflationary universe’, Scientific American, 261, 116128.
Hasker, W. (1999) The Emergent Self (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).
Hershenov, D. (2002) ‘Van Inwagen, Zimmerman, and the materialist conception of resurrection’, Religious Studies, 38, 451469.
Hershenov, D. (2003) ‘The metaphysical problem of intermittent existence and the possibility of resurrection’, Faith & Philosophy, 20, 2436.
Hick, J. (1976) Death and Eternal Life (New York NY: Harper & Row).
Hudson, H. (2001) A Materialist Metaphysics of the Human Person (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).
Kirk, G. S. & Raven, J. E. (1957) The Presocratic Philosophers (New York NY: Cambridge University Press).
Kripke, S. (1980) Naming and Necessity (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Leibniz, G. W. (1697) ‘On the ultimate origination of the universe’, in Schrecher, P. & Schrecker, A. (trans.) Leibniz: Monadology and Other Essays (New York NY: Macmillan Publishing, 1988), 8494.
Leslie, J. (1989) Universes (New York NY: Routledge).
Lewis, D. (1968) ‘Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic’, Journal of Philosophy, 65, 113126.
Lewis, D. (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds (Cambridge MA: Blackwell).
Linde, A. D. (1986) ‘Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary universe’, Physics Letters B, 175, 387502.
Linde, A. D. (1994) ‘The self-reproducing inflationary universe’, Scientific American, 271, 4855.
Mackay, D. (1997) ‘Computer software and life after death’, in Edwards, P. (ed.) Immortality (Amherst NY: Prometheus Books), 248249.
Miller, R. (1992) ‘Concern for counterparts’, Philosophical Papers, 21, 133140.
Moravec, H. (1988) Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Moravec, H. (2000) Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind (New York NY: Oxford University Press).
Nietzsche, F. (1978) Thus Spake Zarathustra (New York NY: Penguin Books).
Parfit, D. (1971) ‘On “The importance of self-identity”’, Journal of Philosophy, 68, 683690.
Peirce, C. S. (1965) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Polkinghorne, J. C. (1985) ‘The scientific worldview and a destiny beyond death’ in MacGregor, G. (ed.) Immortality and Human Destiny: A Variety of Views (New York NY: Paragon House), 180183.
Reichenbach, B. (1978) ‘Monism and the possibility of life after death’, Religious Studies, 14, 2734.
Reichenbach, B. (1979) ‘Must God create the best possible world?’, International Philosophical Quarterly, 19, 203212.
Rescher, N. (1991) G. W. Leibniz's Monadology: An Edition for Students (Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Shorter, J. (1962) ‘More about bodily continuity and personal identity’, Analysis, 22, 7985.
Sider, T. (1996) ‘All the world's a stage’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 433453.
Sider, T. (2001) Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time (New York NY: Oxford University Press).
Smolin, L. (1992) ‘Did the universe evolve?’, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 9, 173191.
Smolin, L. (1997) The Life of the Cosmos (New York NY: Oxford University Press).
Sutherland, S. (1964) ‘Immortality and resurrection’, Religious Studies, 3, 377389.
Van Inwagen, P. (1978) ‘The possibility of resurrection’, in Edwards, P. (ed.) Immortality (Amherst NY: Prometheus Books, 1997), 242246.
Wolfson, H. (1956) ‘Immortality and resurrection in the philosophy of the church fathers’, in Stendahl, K. (ed.) Immortality and Resurrection (New York NY: Macmillan, 1965), 5496.
Zimmerman, D. (1999) ‘The compatibility of materialism and survival: the “falling elevator” model’, Faith and Philosophy, 16, 194212.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed