Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Jordan, Matthew C. 2013. “Theism, Naturalism, and Meta-Ethics”. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 8, Issue. 4, p. 373.


    JORDAN, MATTHEW CAREY 2012. Divine attitudes, divine commands, and the modal status of moral truths. Religious Studies, Vol. 48, Issue. 01, p. 45.


    Hill, Scott 2010. Richard Joyce's New Objections to the Divine Command Theory. Journal of Religious Ethics, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 189.


    ×

Supervenience and property-identical divine-command theory

  • MICHAEL J. ALMEIDA (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412504007085
  • Published online: 11 August 2004
Abstract

Property-identical divine-command theory (PDCT) is the view that being obligatory is identical to being commanded by God in just the way that being water is identical to being H2O. If these identity statements are true, then they express necessary a posteriori truths. PDCT has been defended in Robert M. Adams (1987) and William Alston (1990). More recently Mark C. Murphy (2002) has argued that property-identical divine-command theory is inconsistent with two well-known and well-received theses: the free-command thesis and the supervenience thesis. I show that Murphy's argument is vitiated by mistaken assumptions about the substitutivity of metaphysical identicals in contexts of supervenience. The free-command thesis and the supervenience thesis therefore pose no serious threat to PDCT.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×