Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-x7pwn Total loading time: 0.248 Render date: 2021-05-15T19:48:47.392Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Farmer perceptions of sustainable agriculture practices and drought risk reduction in Nebraska, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2011

C.L. Knutson
Affiliation:
National Drought Mitigation Center, School of Natural Resources, 823 Hardin Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA.
T. Haigh
Affiliation:
National Drought Mitigation Center, School of Natural Resources, 823 Hardin Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA.
M.J. Hayes
Affiliation:
National Drought Mitigation Center, School of Natural Resources, 823 Hardin Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA.
M. Widhalm
Affiliation:
National Drought Mitigation Center, School of Natural Resources, 823 Hardin Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA.
J. Nothwehr
Affiliation:
National Drought Mitigation Center, School of Natural Resources, 823 Hardin Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA.
M. Kleinschmidt
Affiliation:
Organic farmer, Hartington, Nebraska, USA.
L. Graf
Affiliation:
National Drought Mitigation Center, School of Natural Resources, 823 Hardin Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA.
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Social factors, such as farming methods, have an impact on farm vulnerability to drought, but have received little research or policy attention. Some researchers and advocates have argued that sustainable agriculture systems are less vulnerable to climate risk than conventional systems because sustainable agriculture requires producers to have skills promoting adaptability. In this paper, we investigate producers’ perceptions on the use of sustainable agriculture in reducing drought risk, and what they believe would help them better adapt to drought. We surveyed and interviewed farmer members of two sustainable agriculture organizations in Nebraska, USA, during a multi-year drought period from 1999 to 2007. Producers reported implementing a range of practices, such as organic soil building techniques, reduced tillage, targeted crop selection and diversification of crop and livestock production systems, to reduce their drought vulnerability. Although some practices were implemented specifically to reduce drought risk, producers felt that the practices they implemented as part of their normal operation were largely responsible for reducing their risk. Respondents held mixed views on the effects of insurance and farm programs on their drought management decisions. Finally, producers indicated that their ability to adapt to drought is limited by a number of barriers, especially a lack of capital and the need to respond to markets and maximize production to maintain cash flows.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). 2010. Billion Dollar US Weather Disasters. Available at Web site http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/reports/billion/state2008.pdf (accessed March 15, 2010).Google Scholar
2Hayes, M.J., Svoboda, M.D., Knutson, C.L. and Wilhite, D.A. 2004. Estimating the economic impacts of drought. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Applied Climatology, Seattle, WA, January 11–15, 2004. Available at Web site http://ams.confex.com/ams/84Annual/techprogram/paper_73004.htm (accessed November 12, 2009).Google Scholar
3Wilhite, D. 1993. The enigma of drought. In Wilhite, D. (ed.). Drought Assessment, Management, and Planning: Theory and Case Studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. p. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Liverman, D.M. 1999. Vulnerability and adaptation to drought in Mexico. Natural Resources Journal 39:99–116.Google Scholar
5Wilhem, O. and Wilhite, D. 2002. Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: a Nebraska case study. Natural Hazards 25:3758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Luersa, A.L., Lobella, D.B., Sklard, L.S., Addamsa, C.L., and Matsona, P.A. 2003. A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change 13:255267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wilhite, D.A. and Buchanan-Smith, M. 2005. Drought as hazard: understanding the natural and social context. In Wilhite, D.A. (ed.). Drought and Water Crises: Science, Technology, and Management Issues. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8‘Definitions’ Title 7. U.S. Code. Section 3103.Google Scholar
9Wall, E. and Smit, B. 2005. Climate change adaptation in light of sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 27:113123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Lotter, D.W., Seidel, R., and Liebhart, W. 2003. The performance of organic and conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:146154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Sahs, W.W. and Lesoing, G. 1985. Crop rotations and manure versus agricultural chemical in dryland grain production. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40:511516.Google Scholar
12Sullivan, P. 2002. Drought Resistant Soil. (IP169) Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas through the National Center for Appropriate Technology.Google Scholar
13Francis, C.A. and Clegg, M.D. 1990. Crop rotations in sustainable productions systems. In Edwards, C., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R., and House, G. (eds). Sustainable Agriculture Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 107122.Google Scholar
14Zibilske, L. and Bradford, J. 2007. Soil aggregation, aggregate carbon and nitrogen, and moisture retention induced by conservation tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71:793802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Blevins, R.L., Lal, R., Doran, J.W., Langdale, G.W., and Frye, W.W. 1998. Conservation tillage for erosion control and soil quality. In Pierce, F.J. and Frye, W.W. (eds). Advances in Soil and Water Conservation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 5168.Google Scholar
16Unger, P.W., Sharpley, A.N., Steiner, J.L., Papendick, R.I., and Edwards, W.M. 1998. Soil management research for water conservation and quality. In Pierce, F.J. and Frye, W.W. (eds). Advances in Soil and Water Conservation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 6997.Google Scholar
17Brussaard, L., de Ruiter, P.C., and Brown, G.G. 2007. Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121:233244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Altieri, M. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74(1–3):1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Jackson, L.E., Pascual, U., and Hodgkin, T. 2007. Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121:196210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Di Falco, S. and Chavas, J. 2006. Crop genetic diversity, farm productivity and the management of environmental risk in rainfed agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics 33:289314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Di Falco, S. and Chavas, J. 2008. Rainfall shocks, resilience, and the effects of crop biodiversity on agroecosystem productivity. Land Economics 84:8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Niggli, U., Earley, J. and Ogorzalek, K. 2007. Issues paper: Organic agriculture and environmental stability of the food supply. In Conference Proceedings. International Conference on Organic Agriculture and Food Security, Rome, Italy, May 3–5, 2007. Available at Web site ftp://ftp.fao.org/paia/organicag/ofs/OFS-2007-3.pdf (accessed November 2, 2009).Google Scholar
23Borron, S. 2006. Building Resilience for an Unpredictable Future: How Organic Agriculture Can Help Farmers Adapt to Climate Change. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Report.Google Scholar
24Smidt, B. and Skinner, M. 2002. Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7:85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Bradshaw, B., Dolan, H., and Smit, B. 2004. Farm-level adaptation to climatic variability and change: crop diversification in the Canadian Prairies. Climatic Change 67:119141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Hanson, J., Dismukes, R., Chambers, W., Greene, C., and Kremen, A. 2004. Risk and risk management in organic agriculture: views of organic farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19:218227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Nebraska Sustainable Agriculture Society (NSAS). 2010. About Us. Available at Web site http://www.nebsusag.org/about.shtml (accessed September 27, 2010).Google Scholar
28Organic Crop Improvement Society International (OCIA). 2009. Facts about Organic Agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.ocia.org/AboutOCIA/Facts.aspx (accessed September 27, 2010).Google Scholar
29Bernard, H.R. 1994. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 2nd ed.Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
30King, N. and Horrocks, C. 2010. Interviews in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
31United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service. 2009. State Fact Sheets: Nebraska. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/stateFacts/NE.htm (accessed November 15, 2009).Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Farmer perceptions of sustainable agriculture practices and drought risk reduction in Nebraska, USA
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Farmer perceptions of sustainable agriculture practices and drought risk reduction in Nebraska, USA
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Farmer perceptions of sustainable agriculture practices and drought risk reduction in Nebraska, USA
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *