Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Long-term economic performance of organic and conventional field crops in the mid-Atlantic region

  • Michel A. Cavigelli (a1), Beth L. Hima (a1) (a2), James C. Hanson (a3), John R. Teasdale (a1), Anne E. Conklin (a1) and Yao-chi Lu (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

Interest in organic grain production is increasing in the United States but there is limited information regarding the economic performance of organic grain and forage production in the mid-Atlantic region. We present the results from enterprise budget analyses for individual crops and for complete rotations with and without organic price premiums for five cropping systems at the US Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service (USDA–ARS) Beltsville Farming Systems Project (FSP) from 2000 to 2005. The FSP is a long-term cropping systems trial established in 1996 to evaluate the sustainability of organic and conventional grain crop production. The five FSP cropping systems include a conventional, three-year no-till corn (Zea mays L.)–rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop/soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/soybean rotation (no-till (NT)), a conventional, three-year chisel-till corn–rye/soybean–wheat/soybean rotation (chisel tillage (CT)), a two-year organic hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)/corn–rye/soybean rotation (Org2), a three-year organic vetch/corn–rye/soybean–wheat rotation (Org3) and a four- to six-year organic corn–rye/soybean–wheat–red clover (Trifolium pratense L.)/orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) or alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) rotation (Org4+). Economic returns were calculated for rotations present from 2000 to 2005, which included some slight changes in crop rotation sequences due to weather conditions and management changes; additional analyses were conducted for 2000 to 2002 when all crops described above were present in all organic rotations. Production costs were, in general, greatest for CT, while those for the organic systems were lower than or similar to those for NT for all crops. Present value of net returns for individual crops and for full rotations were greater and risks were lower for NT than for CT. When price premiums for organic crops were included in the analysis, cumulative present value of net returns for organic systems (US$3933 to 5446 ha−1, 2000 to 2005; US$2653 to 2869 ha−1, 2000 to 2002) were always substantially greater than for the conventional systems (US$1309 to 1909 ha−1, 2000 to 2005; US$634 to 869 ha−1, 2000 to 2002). With price premiums, Org2 had greater net returns but also greater variability of returns and economic risk across all years than all other systems, primarily because economic success of this short rotation was highly dependent on the success of soybean, the crop with the highest returns. Soybean yield variability was high due to the impact of weather on the success of weed control in the organic systems. The longer, more diverse Org4+ rotation had the lowest variability of returns among organic systems and lower economic risk than Org2. With no organic price premiums, economic returns for corn and soybean in the organic systems were generally lower than those for the conventional systems due to lower grain yields in the organic systems. An exception to this pattern is that returns for corn in Org4+ were equal to or greater than those in NT in four of six years due to both lower production costs and greater revenue than for Org2 and Org3. With no organic premiums, present value of net returns for the full rotations was greatest for NT in 4 of 6 years and greatest for Org4+ the other 2 years, when returns for hay crops were high. Returns for individual crops and for full rotations were, in general, among the lowest and economic risk was, in general, among the highest for Org2 and Org3. Results indicate that Org4+, the longest and most diverse rotation, had the most stable economic returns among organic systems but that short-term returns could be greatest with Org2. This result likely explains, at least in part, why some organic farmers in the mid-Atlantic region, especially those recently converting to organic methods, have adopted this relatively short rotation. The greater stability of the longer rotation, by contrast, may explain why farmers who have used organic methods for longer periods of time tend to favor rotations that include perennial forages.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: michel.cavigelli@ars.usda.gov
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

6C.T. Bull 2006. US federal organic research activity is expanding [Online]. Crop Management. Available at web site http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/symposium/organics/Bull (verified 2 May 2009).

9L.E. Drinkwater , P. Wagoner , and M. Sarrantonio 1998. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262265.

11G.P. Robertson , E.A. Paul , and R.R. Harwood 2000. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:19221925.

12D.D. Poudel , W.R. Horwath , W.T. Lanini , S.R. Temple , and A.H.C. van Bruggen 2002. Comparison of soil N availability and leaching potential, crop yields and weeds in organic, low-input and conventional farming systems in northern California. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 90:125137.

13P.M. Porter , D.R. Huggins , C.A. Perillo , S.R. Quiring , and R.K. Crookston 2003. Organic and other management strategies with two- and four-year crop rotations in Minnesota. Agronomy Journal 95:233244.

14K. Delate and C.A. Cambardella 2004. Agroecosystem performance during transition to certified organic grain production. Agronomy Journal 96:12881298.

15D.W. Archer , A.A. Jaradat , J.M-F. Johnson , S.L. Weyers , R.W. Gesch , F. Forcella , and H.K. Kludze 2007. Crop productivity and economics during the transition to alternative cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 99:15381547.

16M.A. Cavigelli , J.R. Teasdale , and A.E. Conklin 2008. Agronomic performance of organic and conventional field crops in the mid-Atlantic region. Agronomy Journal 100:785794.

19P.R. Mahoney , K.D. Olson , P.M. Porter , D.R. Huggins , C.A. Perillo , and R.K. Crookston 2004. Profitability of organic cropping systems in southwestern Minnesota. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19:3546.

20E.G. Smith , M.J. Clapperton , and R.E. Blackshaw 2004. Profitability and risk of organic production systems in the northern Great Plains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19:152158.

31W.N. Musser , J. Ohannesian , and F.J. Benson 1981. A safety first model of risk management for use in extension programs. North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 3:4146.

33D. Pimentel , P. Hepperley , J. Hanson , D. Douds , and R. Seidel 2005. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55:573582.

36J.R. Teasdale , R.W. Mangum , J. Radhakrishnan , and M.A. Cavigelli 2004. Weed seedbank dynamics in three organic farming crop rotations. Agronomy Journal 96:14291435.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: