Skip to main content

Energy use and efficiency in two Canadian organic and conventional crop production systems

  • J.W. Hoeppner (a1), M.H. Entz (a1), B.G. McConkey (a2), R.P. Zentner (a2) and C.N. Nagy (a3)...

A goal in sustainable agriculture is to use fossil fuel energy more efficiently in crop production. This 12-year study investigated effects of two crop rotations and two crop production systems (organic versus conventional management) on energy use, energy output and energy-use efficiency. The grain-based rotation included wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–pea (Pisum sativum L.)–wheat–flax (Linum usitatissimum L.), while the integrated rotation included wheat–alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)–alfalfa–flax. Energy use was 50% lower with organic than with conventional management, and approximately 40% lower with integrated than with the grain-based rotation. Energy use across all treatments averaged 3420 MJ ha−1 yr−1. Energy output (grain and alfalfa herbage only) across treatments averaged 49,947 MJ ha−1 yr−1 and was affected independently by production system and crop rotation. Energy output in the integrated rotation was three times that of the grain-based rotation; however, this difference was largely due to differences in crop type (whole plant alfalfa compared with grain seed). Energy output was 30% lower with organic than with conventional management. Energy efficiency (output energy/input energy) averaged to 17.4 and was highest in the organic and integrated rotations. A significant rotation by production system interaction (P<0.05) indicated that energy efficiency increases due to crop input reduction (i.e., shift from conventional to organic management) were greater in the integrated than in the grain-based rotation. Greater energy efficiency in the integrated rotation under organic management was attributed to the fact that the forage component was less sensitive to chemical input removal than grain crops.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author:
Hide All
01Fluck, R.C. and Baird, C.D. 1980. Agricultural Energetics. The AVI Publishing Company, Westport, CT.
02Rickerl, D. and Francis, C.A. 2004. Agroecosystems Analysis. Publication 43. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
03Haas, G., Wetterich, F., and Kopke, U. 2001. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process of life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83: 4353.
04Clancy, S.A., Gardner, J.C., Crygiel, C.E., Biondini, M.E., and Johnson, G.K. 1993. Farming practices for a sustainable agriculture in North Dakota. North Dakota State University, Carrington Research Extension Centre, Carrington, ND
05Nagy, C. 1999. Energy coefficients for agricultural inputs in western Canada. Centre for Studies in Agriculture, Law and the Environment, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.
06Smil, V. 2000. Feeding the World: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
07Swanton, C.J., Murphy, S.D., Hume, D.J., and Clements, D.R. 1996. Recent improvements in the energy efficiency of agriculture: case studies from Ontario, Canada. Agricultural Systems 52: 399418.
08Stout, B.A. 1990. Handbook of Energy for World Agriculture. Elsevier Science Publishing, New York, NY.
09Pimentel, D., Jurd, L.E., Bellotti, A.C., Forster, M.J., Oka, I.N., Sholes, O.D., and Whitman, R.J. 1973. Food production and the energy crisis. Science 182: 443449.
10Smil, V. 1997. Global population and the nitrogen cycle. Scientific American 277: 7681.
11Smil, V. 2001. Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12Hesterman, O.B. 1988. Exploiting forage legumes for nitrogen contribution in cropping systems. In Hargrove, W.L. (ed.). Cropping Strategies for Efficient Use of Water and Nitrogen, ASA Special Publication Number 51. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 155166.
13Entz, M.H., Baron, V.S., Carr, P.M., Meyer, D.W., Smith, S.R., and McCaughey, W.P. 2002. Potential of forages to diversify Northern Great Plain Cropping Systems. Agronomy Journal 94: 240250.
14Kelner, D.J., Vessey, J.K., and Entz, M.H. 1997. The nitrogen dynamics of 1-, 2- and 3-year stands of alfalfa in a cropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 64: 110.
15Beckie, H.J. and Brandt, S.A. 1997. Nitrogen contribution of field pea in annual cropping systems. 1. Nitrogen residual effect. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 77: 311322.
16Penning, L.J. and Orr, D. 1988. Effects of crop rotation on common root rot of barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 10: 6165.
17Hoeppner, J.W. 2002. Energy use and efficiency in long-term western Canadian field studies. MSc thesis Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
18Ensminger, M.E. 1987. Feeding beef cattle. In Ensminger, M.E. and Perry, R.C. (eds). Beef Cattle Science. The Interstate Printers and Publishers, Danville, IL, p. 239348.
19Campbell, C.A., Zentner, R.P., Janzen, H.H., and Bowren, K.E. 1990. Crop rotation studies on the Canadian Prairies. Publication 1841. Government Publications Center, Ottawa, ON.
20Heichel, G.H. 1980. Assessing the fossil energy costs of propagating agricultural crops. In Pimental, D. (ed.). Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 2733.
21Heichel, G.H. 1978. Stabilizing agricultural energy needs: role of forages, rotations, and nitrogen fixation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 33: 278282.
22Spedding, C.R.W. and Walsingham, J.M. 1976. The production and use of energy in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics 27: 1930.
23Ominski, P.D., Entz, M.H., and Kenkel, N. 1999. The suppressive effects of Medicago sativa on weeds in subsequent cereal crops: a comparative survey. Weed Science 47: 282290.
24Pimentel, D. 1997. Livestock production: energy inputs and the environment. In Proceedings 47th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society of Animal Science, Montreal. p. 1626.
25Entz, M.H., Guilford, R., and Gulden, R. 2001. Crop yield and nutrient status on 14 organic farms in the eastern Northern Great Plains. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81: 351354.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 120 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 608 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.