Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-kpmwg Total loading time: 0.387 Render date: 2021-12-07T16:31:34.857Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The economic corridors paradigm as extractivism: Four theses for a historical materialist framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2021

Charlie Thame*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand
*
*Corresponding author: Email: thamec@tu.ac.th

Abstract

Economic corridors are under construction across the planet. Trillions of dollars are being spent and they will have significant implications for international politics and, ultimately, world order. However, there has been limited conceptual work on them to date, especially in International Relations. This article contributes to that gap by explaining the dominant rationale before offering a conceptualisation of economic corridors as an essentially extractivist paradigm. This counter-hegemonic proposition revolves around four relational theses: (1) economic corridors are a ‘fix’ for crises of capitalism; (2) economic corridors exacerbate class struggle; (3) economic corridors are tools for exploitation; (4) economic corridors facilitate financial extraction. In so doing it unmasks the dominant rationale as ideological cover for valorisation and accumulation based on extractive and exploitative relations with human and extra-human nature. Rather than contributing to inclusive and sustainable development as proponents claim, the article contends economic corridors reinforce power asymmetries between states, countries, and classes, thereby extending and entrenching processes of uneven and combined development. The argument is substantiated with empirical reference to mainland Southeast Asia but aims to advance understanding of extractive dynamics integral to the concept of economic corridors and hence operative worldwide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wolf, Siegfried, The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor of the Belt and Road Initiative (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019), p. 5Google Scholar.

2 H. P. Brunner, ‘What is Economic Corridor Development and What Can It Achieve in Asia's Subregions?’, Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, No. 117 (2013), p. 1.

3 Stephanie Petrella, ‘What Is an Economic Corridor?’, CSIS, available at: {https://reconnectingasia.csis.org/analysis/entries/what-economic-corridor/} accessed 7 September 2018.

4 Pradeep Srivastava, ‘Regional Corridors Development in Regional Cooperation’, ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 258 (May 2011), pp. 1–30 (p. 1).

5 Petrella, ‘What Is an Economic Corridor?’.

6 Toshihiro Kudo, ‘Special Economic Zones and Economic Corridors’, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (June 2009), pp. 1–24 (p. 4); Eva Gálvez Nogales, ‘Making Economic Corridors Work for the Agricultural Sector’, Agribusiness and Food Industries Series (Rome: FAO, 2014), p. 42.

7 Paul Cammack, ‘World market regionalism at the Asian Development Bank’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46:2 (11 February 2016), pp. 173–97 (p. 178).

8 Thant Myo, Tang Min, and Hiroshi Kakazu (eds), Growth Triangles in Asia (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995); Donald Weatherbee, International Relations in Southeast Asia (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009), p. 118.

9 Kudo, ‘Special Economic Zones’, pp 10–18.

10 Charlie Thame, SEZs and Value Extraction from the Mekong (Bangkok: Focus on the Global South, 2017).

11 Mala Hettige, Greater Mekong Subregion (Metro Manila: ADB, 2009), p. 1; GMS Secretariat, Review of Configuration of the Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Corridors (Manila: ADB 2016), p. 1.

12 GMS Summit of Leaders, ‘Joint Summit Declaration’ (2018), available at: {https://www.greatermekong.org/joint-summit-declaration-6th-gms-summit-leaders} accessed 7 June 2019.

13 Lu Guangsheng, China Seeks to Improve Mekong Sub-Regional Cooperation (Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2016), p. 7.

14 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Peoples Republic of China, ‘Li Keqiang Attends the Opening Ceremony of Fifth Summit of the Greater Mekong Sub-Region Economic Cooperation Program’, available at: {https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1221882.shtml}; Guangsheng, China Seeks, p. 3.

15 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Peoples Republic of China, ‘Five Features of Lancang-Mekong River Cooperation’ (2016), available at: {https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1349239.shtml#:~:text=At%20the%20present%20stage%2C%20the,agriculture%20and%20poverty%2Dreduction%20cooperation} accessed 10 August 2020; Mekong-Lancang Leaders' Meeting, ‘Phnom Penh Declaration’ (2018a), Arts 2.2, 2.4 (2018b), Art. 21, available at: {https://pressocm.gov.kh/en/archives/21699} accessed 10 August 2020.

16 Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity (Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2011); ASEAN, Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025 (Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2016).

17 Michael Plummer et al. (eds), Connecting Asia (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2016); Rajeev Ranjan Chaturvedy and K. Yhome (eds), Emerging Trans-Regional Corridors: South and Southeast Asia (New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation, 2017), p. 32.

18 Alyssa Ayres, ‘Pompeo's Indo-Pacific strategy is just a start’, CNN (2018), available at: {https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/30/opinions/pompeos-indo-pacific-strategy-opinion-ayres/index.html} accessed 9 June 2019.

19 European Commission, ‘Corridors’, available at: {https://ec.europa.eu/transport/node/2443} accessed 20 August 2020; GMS Secretariat, Review of Configuration, p. 3.

20 See Hilhorst, J. G. M., ‘Development axes and the diffusion of innovation’, Development and Change, 4:1 (January 1973), pp. 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Geyer, H. S., ‘The development axis as a development instrument in the southern African development area’, Development Southern Africa, 4:2 (May 1987), pp. 271300CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Priemus, Hugo and Zonneveld, Wil, ‘What are corridors and what are the issues?’, Journal of Transport Geography, 11:3 (September 2003), pp. 167–77 (p. 169)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Prabir De and Kavita Iyengar (eds), Developing Economic Corridors in South Asia (Manila: ADB, 2014), p. v.

23 Krugman, Paul, ‘Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade’, Journal of International Economics, 9:4 (1979), pp. 469–79 (p. 479)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neary, Peter, the, ‘Puttingnew” into new trade theory’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111:2 (June 2009), pp. 217–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ehnts, Dirk and Trautwein, Hans-Michael, ‘From new trade theory to new economic geography’, Œconomia, 2–1 (1 March 2012), pp. 3566Google Scholar.

24 Ehnts and Trautwein, ‘From new trade theory’.

25 Paul Krugman, Geography and Trade (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991); Krugman, Paul, ‘What's new about the new economic geography?’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14:2 (1998), pp. 717CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for a critique, see Wilson, Japhy, ‘Colonising space: The new economic geography in theory and practice’, New Political Economy, 16:3 (July 2011), pp. 373–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Neary, ‘Putting the “new” into new trade theory’, p. 233; Fingleton, Bernard and Fischer, Manfred, ‘Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography’, The Annals of Regional Science, 44:3 (21 January 2009), pp. 467–91 (p. 472)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Richard Baldwin, The Great Convergence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).

28 Cammack, ‘World market regionalism’.

29 Alexander Anievas, ‘The renaissance of historical materialism in International Relations theory’, in Alexander Anievas (ed.), Marxism and World Politics (London, UK: Routledge, 2010), p. 3.

30 Andreas Bieler and Adam David Morton, Global Capitalism, Global War, Global Crisis (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018)

31 Conclusion in ibid.

32 Shahar Hameiri and Lee Jones, ‘Murdoch International: The “Murdoch School” in International Relations’, Asia Research Centre Working Paper, No. 178 (December 2014), p. 4.

33 Ibid., p. 14. See also Toby Carroll, ‘The political economy of Southeast Asia's development from independence to hyperglobalisation’, in Toby Carroll, Shahar Hameiri, and Lee Jones (eds), The Political Economy of Southeast Asia (4th edn, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020); Bieler and Morton, Global Capitalism.

Ibid

34 Bieler and Morton, Global Capitalism, pp. 82–4, 85–6, 251.

35 Ibid., esp. p. 40, ch. 4.

Ibid

36 Dufour, Frédérick, ‘Social-property regimes and the uneven and combined development of nationalist practices’, European Journal of International Relations, 13:4 (2007), pp 583–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anievas, Alexander, ‘Debating uneven and combined development’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:1 (2009), pp. 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Jamie Peck, ‘Combination’, in Antipode Editorial Collective (eds), Keywords in Radical Geography Antipode at 50 (2019), p. 50.

38 Jamie Peck, ‘Uneven regional development’, in Richard A. Marston et al. (eds), The International Encyclopaedia of Geography (Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2016), p. 1.

39 Ibid.

Ibid

40 Neil Smith, Uneven Development (3rd edn, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2008), p. 6.

41 David Harvey, Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014); Peck, ‘Uneven regional development’, p. 4; Smith, Uneven Development, p. 194.

42 Alexander Anievas and Kerem Nişancıoğlu, How the West Came to Rule (London, UK: Pluto Press, 2015).

43 Justin Rosenberg, The Empire of Civil Society (London, UK: Verso, 1994); Benno Teschke, The Myth of 1648 (London, UK: Verso. 2003).

44 Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George, ‘The global transformation’, International Studies Quarterly, 57:3 (2013), pp. 620–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Bob Jessop, ‘Poulantzas's state, power, socialism as a modern classic’, in Alexander Gallas, Lars Bretthauer, and John Kannankulam (eds), Reading Poulantzas: Marxism, Law and the State (London, UK: Merlin, 2011), pp. 42–55.

46 Kiely, Ray, ‘Spatial hierarchy and/or contemporary geopolitics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25:2 (2012), pp. 231–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Alexander Anievas and Kamran Matin, ‘Rethinking historical sociology and world history’, in Alexander Anievas and Kamran Matin (eds), Historical Sociology and World History (London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016), p. 254.

48 Peck, ‘Combination’, p. 53.

49 Anievas and Matin, ‘Rethinking historical sociology’, p. 254.

50 Jessop, ‘Poulantzas's state, power, socialism’, p. 54.

51 Kiely, ‘Spatial hierarchy and/or contemporary geopolitics’, p. 243.

52 Patrick Bond, Looting Africa (London, UK: Zed Books, 2006), p. 71; Patrick Bond, ‘Uneven development and resource extractivism in Africa’, in Clive Splash (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics (London, UK: Routledge, 2018), pp. 404–13 (p. 404).

53 Bond, Looting Africa, p. 11.

54 Eduardo Gudynas, ‘Ten Urgent Theses About Extractivism in Relation to Current South American Progressivism’, Americas Program Report (Washington, DC: 27 January 2010).

55 Wilson, ‘Colonising space’, p. 384; Morten Ougaard, ‘The transnational state and the infrastructure push’, New Political Economy, available at: {DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1349085}; Ngai-Ling Sum, ‘The intertwined geopolitics and geoeconomics of hopes/fears’, Territory, Politics, Governance, p. 11, available at: {DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1523746}.

56 Wilson, ‘Colonising space’, p. 390.

57 Ibid., pp. 390, 385.

Ibid

58 Seth Schindler et al., ‘The twenty-first century rediscovery of regional planning in the Global South’, in Anssi Paasi, John Harrison, and Martin Jones (eds), Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. 346–57 (pp. 346, 354).

59 Ougaard, ‘The transnational state’, pp. 4, 9.

60 Nicholas Hildyard and Xavier Sol, ‘A Critical Introduction to Infrastructure Mega-Corridors’ (Counter Balance, 16 December 2017), pp. 18–20.

61 Tim Bunnell, Malaysia, Modernity and the Multimedia Super Corridor (London, UK: Routledge, 2004).

62 Nicholas Hildyard, Licensed Larceny (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2016).

63 Alessandro Rippa, Asian Borderlands (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020), p. 207.

64 Dey, Ishita and Grappi, Georgio, ‘Beyond zoning’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 114:1 (2 January 2015), pp. 153–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Veltmeyer, Henry, ‘Capitalism, development, imperialism, globalisation’, Globalisations (2019), p. 4Google Scholar, fn. 3, available at: {DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2019.1699706}.

66 Verónica Gago and Sandro Mezzadra, ‘A critique of the extractive operations of capital’, Rethinking Marxism, 29:4 (2018), pp. 574–91 (p. 577).

67 Sandro Mezzadra and Brett Neilson, The Politics of Operations (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019), p. 38.

68 Ibid., p. 34.

Ibid

69 Ibid., p. 138.

Ibid

70 Ibid., pp. 164, 138.

Ibid

71 Ibid., p. 7.

Ibid

72 Bob Jessop, ‘The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalising capitalism’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24:2 (June 2000), pp. 323–60; see, for example, David Harvey, The New Imperialism (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003); David Harvey, The Limits to Capital (London, UK: Verso, 2006).

73 Bieler and Morton, Global Capitalism, pp. 69, 165–6.

74 Harvey, David, ‘The “new” imperialism’, Socialist Register, 40 (2009), pp. 6387Google Scholar (pp. 63, 64–5).

75 Bieler and Morton, Global Capitalism, p. 166.

76 Harvey, The New Imperialism; Harvey, Limits to Capital; Jim Glassman, Bounding the Mekong (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2010).

77 Wan, Ming, ‘Japan and the Asian Development Bank’, Pacific Affairs, 68 (1995), pp. 509–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 522–3).

78 Walden Bello, Paradigm Trap (Amsterdam: Transnational Institute, 2018), p. 30.

79 Kudo, ‘Special Economic Zones’, p. 4.

80 Feenstra, Robert C., Inklaar, Robert, and Timmer, Marcel P., ‘The next generation of the Penn World Table’, American Economic Review, 105:10 (2015), pp. 3150–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: {www.ggdc.net/pwt}.

81 Marc Innes-Brown and Mark J. Valencia, ‘Thailand's resource diplomacy in Indochina and Myanmar’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 14 (March 1993), pp. 332–49 (pp. 333–5).

82 Weatherbee, International Relations in Southeast Asia, p. 123.

83 Stock Exchange of Thailand, ‘2016 Outward Foreign Direct Investment of Thai Listed Firms’ (2017), p. 11.

84 Stock Exchange of Thailand, ‘2017 Outward Foreign Direct Investment of Thai Listed Firms’ (2018), pp. 7, 8.

85 Charlie Thame, Joint Study and Survey of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and Cross Border Economic Zones (CBEZs) (Khon Kaen: Mekong Institute, 2018); Thame, Charlie, ‘State transformation and uneven development across Southeast Asia's cross-border special economic zones’, Journal of Political Science Review, 6:1 (2020), pp. 2967Google Scholar.

86 Lee Jones and Jinghan Zeng, ‘Understanding China's “Belt and Road Initiative”’, Third World Quarterly (2019), p. 7, available at: {DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2018.1559046}.

87 Ibid.

Ibid

88 Thame, SEZs and Value Extraction; Thame, Joint Survey.

89 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), World Investment Report 2019 (New York, 2019), p. 69.

90 Bieler and Morton, Global Capitalism, pp. 123, 127–8.

91 James Petras and Henry Veltmeyer, Extractive Imperialism in the Americas (Leiden: Brill, 2014), pp. 9–10.

92 Ibid., p. 10.

Ibid

93 Cemal Burak Tansel (ed.), States of Discipline (London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017).

94 Glassman, Bounding the Mekong, pp. 14–15.

95 Ibid., pp. 11, 167–8.

Ibid

96 Jones and Zeng, ‘Understanding China's “Belt and Road Initative”’.

97 Hughes, Caroline, ‘Soldiers, monks, borders’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41:2 (May 2011), pp. 181205CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 202, 187).

98 Jones, Lee, ‘The political economy of Myanmar's transition’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 44:1 (2014), pp. 144–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 166).

99 Tubilewicz, Czeslaw and Jayasuriya, Kanishka, ‘Internationalisation of the Chinese subnational state and capital’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69:2 (3 December 2014), pp. 185204CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hameiri, Shahar, Jones, Lee, and Zou, Yizheng, ‘The development-insecurity nexus in China's near-abroad’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49:3 (11 April 2019), pp. 473–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 Simon Springer, Cambodia's Neoliberal Order (London, UK: Routledge, 2010).

101 John Buchanan et al., Developing Disparity (Amsterdam: Burma Centre Netherlands, 2013); Jones, ‘The political economy of Myanmar's transition’.

102 Chiengkul, Prapimphan, ‘Uneven development, inequality and concentration of power’, Third World Quarterly, 40:9 (22 May 2019), pp. 1689–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

103 Prajak Kongkirati and Veerayooth Kanchoochat, ‘The Prayuth regime’, TRaNS: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia, 6 (July 2018), pp. 279–305.

104 Thame, SEZs and Value Extraction.

105 Veltmeyer, ‘Capitalism, development’, p. 3.

106 Derek Hall, Phillip Hirsch, and Tania Murray Li, Powers of Exclusion (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2011); Arnold, Dennis and Campbell, Stephen, ‘Capitalist trajectories in Mekong Southeast Asia’, European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17:2 (1 January 2018), pp. 181–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Aung, Geoffrey, ‘Postcolonial capitalism and the politics of dispossession’, European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17:2 (1 January 2018), pp. 193227CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Mekong Migration Network and Asian Migrant Centre, Migration in the Greater Mekong Subregion (Chiang Mai: Wanida Press, 2013), p. 175.

108 Charlie Thame, ‘Human rights, business, and the reliance on elusive state champions’, in Matthew Mullen et al. (eds), Navigating a New Era of Business and Human Rights (Bangkok: Article 30 – Mahidol University IHRPS, 2019), pp. 73–9.

109 Dani Rodrik, The Globalisation Paradox (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011), pp. 200–01.

110 For a terminological discussion, see Jennifer Bair, ‘Global capitalism and commodity chains’, Competition & Change, 9 (2005), pp. 153–80 and Intan Suwandi, Value Chains (New York, NY: Monthly Review Press, 2019), pp. 24–5, 46.

111 Selwyn, Benjamin, ‘Twenty-first-century international political economy’, European Journal of International Relations, 21:3 (2014), pp. 513–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Selwyn, Benjamin, ‘Poverty chains and global capitalism’, Competition & Change, 23:1 (2019), pp. 7197CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

112 Beverly Silver, Forces of Labour (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 64–6; Selwyn, ‘Twenty-first-century international political economy’; John Smith, Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century (New York, NY: Monthly Review Press, 2016), p. 188.

113 Suwandi, Value Chains, pp. 14, 18–19, 33, 54.

114 Ibid., p. 54.

Ibid

115 Rafiq, Arif, ‘The China-Pakistan economic corridor’, Asian Affairs, 50:2 (2019), pp. 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 3).

116 UNCTAD, Trade and Development Report 2018 (New York, 2018), p. 50.

117 See, for example, Neef, Andreas, Touch, Siphat, and Chiengthong, Jamaree, ‘The politics and ethics of land concessions in Rural Cambodia’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26:6 (2013), pp. 1085–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar;

Kenney-Lazar, Miles, Suhardiman, Diana, and Dwyer, Michael B., ‘State spaces of resistance’, Antipode, 50:5 (2018), pp. 1290–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

118 Bello, Paradigm Trap, p. 31; Barbesgaard, Mads, ‘Ocean and land control-grabbing’, Journal of Rural Studies, 69 (2019), pp. 195203CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

119 Thame, SEZs and Value Extraction; Thame, Joint Survey.

120 Oizumi, Keiichiro, ‘The potential of the “Thailand-Plus-One” business model: A new fragmentation in East Asia’, RIM Pacific Businesses and Industries, XIII (2013), pp. 120Google Scholar; Pavin Chachavalpongpun, ‘Japan pursues a “Thailand-Plus-One” strategy’, ISEAS Perspective (Singapore), 15 (2014).

121 Suwandi, Value Chains, p. 54.

122 Brunner, ‘What Is Economic Corridor Development’, p. 1.

123 Glassman, Bounding the Mekong, pp. 167–8.

124 William Milberg and Deborah Winkler, Outsourcing Economics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 17, 24–5.

125 UNCTAD, Trade and Development Report 2018, p. 79.

126 Jayant Menon, Narrowing the Development Divide in ASEAN (Manilla: ADB, 2012), p. 2.

127 Thame, SEZs and Value Extraction; Kyoko Kusakabe and Carli Melo, Jobs in SEZs (Bangkok: Asian Institute of Technology and Mekong Migration Network, June 2019).

128 Milberg and Winkler, Outsourcing Economics, p. 304.

129 Pitch Pongsawat, ‘Border Partial Citizenship, Border Towns, and Thai-Myanmar Cross-Border Development’ (PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2007); Arnold, Dennis and Pickles, John, ‘Global work, surplus labour, and the precarious economies of the border’, Antipode, 43:5 (1 June 2011), pp. 1598–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stephen Campbell, Border Capitalism, Disrupted (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2018).

130 International Labour Organization, World Employment and Social Outlook (Geneva, 2015), p. 143; Suwandi, Value Chains, p. 56.

131 Ricci, Andrea, ‘Unequal exchange in the age of globalization’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 51 (2018), pp. 225–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

132 Gerald Epstein, ‘Financialisation and the world economy’, in Gerald Epstein (ed.), Financialisation and the World Economy (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005), pp. 3–17 (p. 3).

133 See, for example, Giovanni Arrighi, The Long Twentieth Century (London, UK: Verso, 2010); Guglielmo Carchedi, ‘The old is dying and the new cannot be born’, in Michael Roberts and Guiglelmo Carchedi (eds), World in Crisis (Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, 2018); Mavroudeas, Stavros and Demophanes, Papadatos, ‘Is the financialisation hypothesis a theoretical blind alley?’, World Review of Political Economy, 9:4 (2018), pp. 451–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 453, 466).

134 Carchedi, ‘The old is dying’.

135 Cédric Durand, Fictitious Capital (London, UK: Verso, 2017).

136 Mezzadra and Nielsen, The Politics of Operations, p. 163.

137 Rick Rowden, From the Washington Consensus to the Wall Street Consensus (Washington, DC: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2019); Hildyard and Sol, A Critical Introduction, p. 23; Xavier Sol, ‘Rebuilding the world’, Open Democracy, available at: {https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/rebuilding-world-hubris-behind-global-infrastructure-agenda/} accessed 29 May 2019.

138 Hildyard, Licensed Larceny, pp. 31–2.

139 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, ‘Why Infrastructure Matters’ (n.d.), available at: {https://www.ebrd.com/infrastructure/infrastructure-matters.com} accessed 10 June 2019; World Bank, GDP (current US $) (2020), available at: {https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?}.

140 ASEAN, Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity, p. 62; Global Infrastructure Hub, ‘Insights into Infrastructure Markets’ (2017), available at: {https://www.gihub.org/resources/publications/edhec-annual-global-infrastructure-investor-survey-2017/} p. 1; UNCTAD, Trade and Development Report 2018, p. 115.

141 Hildyard, Licensed Larceny; UNCTAD, Trade and Development Report 2018, pp. 118–21.

142 Bayliss, Kate and Waeyenberge, Elisa Van, ‘Unpacking the public private partnership revival’, The Journal of Development Studies, 54:2 (25 March 2017), pp. 117Google Scholar.

143 Hildyard, Licensed Larceny, p. 9.

144 Shalmali Guttal and Sophea Chrek, An Overview of Large-Scale Investments in the Mekong Region (Bangkok: Focus on the Global South, 2016); International Court of Justice (ICJ), Special Economic Zones in Myanmar and the State Duty to Protect Human Rights (Geneva: ICJ, 2017); ICJ, The Human Rights Consequences of the Eastern Economic Corridor and Special Economic Zones in Thailand (Geneva: International Commission of Jurists, 2020).

145 ASEAN, Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity, p. 60.

146 Hildyard, Licensed Larceny, pp. 32, 60, fn. 2.

147 GMS Secretariat, The Ha Noi Action Plan 2018–2022 (Metro Manila: ADB, 2018), p. ix; GMS Secretariat, Regional Investment Framework 2022 (Metro Manila: ADB, 2019).

148 Hildyard, Licensed Larceny, pp. 31–2, 44–5; Global Infrastructure Hub, Insights into Infrastructure, Markets, p. 1.

149 Norfield, The City, p. 126.

150 Alami, Ilias, ‘Money power of capital and production of “new state spaces”’, New Political Economy, 23:4 (2018), pp. 512–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ilias Alami, ‘Global finance capital and Third World debt’, in Immanuel Ness and Zak Cope (eds), The Palgrave Encyclopaedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019), pp. 1–19.

151 Phornchanok Souvannaseng, ‘Losing Ground’ (PhD dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 2019).

152 Lao PDR SEZ Promotion and Management Office (September 2018).

153 International Monetary Fund, Lao People's Democratic Republic: 2017 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Lao People's Democratic Republic (2018), p. 38, available at: {https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2018/03/23/Lao-Peoples-Democratic-Republic-2017-Article-IV-Consultation-Press-Release-Staff-Report-and-45750}.

154 Apisom Intralawan et al., Economic Evaluation of Hydropower Projects in the Lower Mekong Basin (Chiang Rai: Mae Fah Luang University, 2017), pp. 2, 13.

155 Phillip Alston, ‘Statement by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights on His Visit to Lao PDR, 18–28 March 2019’ (2019), pp. 7–8, available at: {https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/EPoverty/EOSVisitToLao28Mar2019_EN.pdf}; International Rivers and IDI, Reckless Endangerment (Asheville, NC and Oakland, CA: IDI & International Rivers, 2019).

156 Hildyard and Sol, A Critical Introduction to Infrastructure Mega-Corridors, p. 23.

157 Lazonick and Shin, Predatory Value Extraction; Chang and Andreoni, Industrial Policy in the 21st Century, pp. 19, 21.

158 Celine Gimet et al., ‘Fragmentation and immiserising specialisation’, halshs-00464393 (2010), pp. 1–20.

159 Adam Simpson, ‘Market building and risk under a regime in transition’, in Toby Carroll and Darryl S. L. Jarvis, The Politics of Marketising Asia (London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 162, 169.

160 Petry, Johannes, ‘Financialization with Chinese characteristics?’, Economy and Society, 49:2 (28 April 2020), pp. 213–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 219), available at: {DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2020.1718913}.

161 Sum, ‘The intertwined geopolitics and geoeconomics’.

162 For a discussion, see Ilias Alami et al., ‘State capitalism and the new global D/development regime’, Antipode (April 2021), pp. 1–25, available at: {DOI: 10.1111/anti.12725}.

163 Schindler, Seth et al. , ‘Contemporary megaprojects’, Environment and Society, 10:1 (8 August 2019), pp. 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 6), available at: {DOI: 10.3167/ares.2019.100101}.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The economic corridors paradigm as extractivism: Four theses for a historical materialist framework
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The economic corridors paradigm as extractivism: Four theses for a historical materialist framework
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The economic corridors paradigm as extractivism: Four theses for a historical materialist framework
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *