Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Deterrence theory: where do we stand?

Abstract
Abstract

Although deterrence theory was a central focus in the study of International Relations during the Cold War, attention has shifted away from deterrence since the end of that conflict. Nonetheless, deterrence is a general phenomenon that is not limited to any particular time or space. Moving beyond a simple focus on the US-Soviet relationship, scholars have recently begun further explorations of deterrence, through development of theory, analysis of policy alternatives, and empirical analysis. This article seeks to evaluate where deterrence theory stands today through: (1) a consideration of distinctions between different strands of theory; (2) a discussion of the assumption of rationality in deterrence theory; (3) an examination of three important distinctions in deterrence; (4) an evaluation of the difficult task of testing deterrence theory, and (5) an overview of recent theoretical developments. The primary conclusion is that perfect deterrence theory provides a logically consistent alternative to classical deterrence theory and therefore provides the most appropriate basis for further theoretical development, empirical testing, and application to policy.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Frank C. Zagare and D. Marc Kilgour , Perfect Deterrence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)

Patrick M. Morgan , Deterrence Now (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)

Vesna Danilovic , When the Stakes Are High (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002)

Bernard Brodie , Strategy in the Missile Age (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959)

Glenn Snyder , Deterrence and Defense (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961)

Robert Powell , Nuclear Deterrence Theory: The Search for Credibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)

T. V. Paul , Asymmetric Conflicts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)

Rebecca B. Morton , Methods and Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)

Gerhard L. Weinberg , Germany, Hitler, and World War II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 91

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score