Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:02:23.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reshaping critical geopolitics? The materialist challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2014

VICKI SQUIRE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How can the ‘materialist turn’ contribute to the reshaping of critical geopolitics? This article draws attention to the limits of an approach that emphasises the representational, cultural, and interpretive dimensions of geopolitics, while acknowledging the difficulties of an ontological shift to materiality for many scholars of critical geopolitics. It draws on the work of Karen Barad and Annemarie Mol in order to advance three arguments for the reshaping of critical geopolitics as a field of research. First, it argues for an approach to the analysis of power that examines materialdiscursive intra-actions and that cuts across various ontological, analytical, and disciplinary divides. Second, it argues for an analysis of boundary-production that focuses on the mutual enactment or co-constitution of subjects, objects, and environments rather than on performance. Third, it argues for an analytical approach that engages the terrain of geopolitics in terms of a multiplicity of ‘cuts’ that trouble simplifying geopolitical imaginations along with the clear-cut boundaries that these often imply. In so doing, the article makes the case for a more-than-human approach that does not overstate the efficacy of matter, but rather that engages processes of materialisation and dematerialisation without assuming materiality to be a determinant force.

Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 139 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dalby, Simon, Environmental Security (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

2 Pain, Rachel and Smith, Susan J. (eds), Fear: Critical Geopolitics and Everyday Life (Abingdon: Ashgate, 2008)Google Scholar.

3 Mountz, Alison, ‘The Enforcement Archipelago: Detention, Haunting and Asylum on Islands’, Political Geography, 30 (2011), pp. 118–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Ingram, Alan, ‘Viral geopolitics: Biosecurity and Global Health Governance’, in Dobson, Andrewet al. (eds), Biosecurity: The Socio-politics of Invasive Species and Infectious Diseases (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 137–50Google Scholar.

5 Dowler, Lorraine and Sharp, Joanne, ‘A feminist Geopolitics?’, Space and Polity, 5:3 (2001), pp. 165–76, p. 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 For example, see Joanne Sharp, ‘Geopolitics at the Margins? Reconsidering Genealogies of Critical Geopolitics’, Political Geography (2013), doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.04.006

7 Dodds, Klaus, Kuus, Merje, and Sharp, Joanne, ‘Introduction: Critical Geopolitics and its Critics’, in Dodds, Klauset al. (eds), The Ashgate Compendium to Critical Geopolitics (Abingdon: Ashgate), pp. 1–18Google Scholar.

8 Coole, Diana and Frost, Samantha (eds), New Materialisms (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Klaus Dodds et al., ‘Introduction: Critical Geopolitics and its Critics’, p. 7.

10 Any distinction between the material and the representational is problematic, and overlooks more sophisticated conceptualisations of discourse that refuse such a divide. Indeed, one can say that the critical geopolitics that I seek to critique was to a large part grounded on a more sophisticated conception of discourse that challenges such a divide. However, what I also want to suggest is that the emphasis on representation, culture, and text/narrative in the early formation of critical geopolitics has risked the interpretation of such a divide being manifest, such as in Müller's critique of critical geopolitics, which I detail later in the article. For a more detailed discussion of discourse integral to the formation of critical geopolitics, see Dalby, Simon, Creating the Second Cold War: The Discourse of Politics (London: Pinter, 1990)Google Scholar.

11 Dittmer, Jason, ‘Geopolitical Assemblages and Complexity’, Progress in Human Geography (published online 2013, DOI: 10.1177/0309132513501405). Progress in Human Geography, 38:3 (2014), pp. 385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Bennett, Jane, Vibrant Matter (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

13 Hyndman, Jennifer, ‘Feminist Geopolitics Revisited: Body Counts in Iraq’, The Professional Geographer, 59:1 (2007), pp. 35–46, p. 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Klaus Dodds et al., ‘Introduction: Critical Geopolitics and its Critics’, p. 6.

15 See, for example, Dalby, Simon, ‘Recontextualising Violence, Power and Nature: The Next Twenty Years of Critical Geopolitics?’, Political Geography, 29:5 (2010), pp. 280–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dittmer, Jason and Gray, Nicholas, ‘Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday’, Geography Compass, 4:11 (2008), pp. 1664–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dodds, Klaus, ‘Political Geography III: Critical Geopolitics After 10 years’, Progress in Human Geography, 25:3 (2001), pp. 469–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Power, Marcus and Campbell, David, ‘The State of Critical Geopolitics’, Political Geography, 29:5 (2010), pp. 243–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Dittmer, ‘Geopolitical Assemblages and Complexity’.

17 Klaus Dodds et al., ‘Introduction: Critical Geopolitics and its Critics’, p. 7.

18 Lorraine Dowler and Joanne Sharp, ‘A Feminist Geopolitics?’

19 Ó Tuathail, Gearóid and Dalby, Simon (eds), Rethinking Geopolitics (London: Routledge, 1998), p. 1Google Scholar.

20 Ó Tuathail and Dalby, Rethinking Geopolitics, p. 2.

21 The early work of Ó Tuathail and Dalby referred to the importance of materiality in terms of the significance of power and political economy to geopolitics, while their recent work refers more to the importance of materiality in terms of the effects of somatic and geological factors for geopolitical practice.

22 Ó Tuathail and Dalby, Rethinking Geopolitics, p. 3.

23 Ibid.

24 Ó Tuathail and Dalby, Rethinking Geopolitics, p. 4.

25 Ibid.

26 Richard Ashley, cited in Ó Tuathail and Dalby, Rethinking Geopolitics, p. 4.

27 Ó Tuathail and Dalby, Rethinking Geopolitics, p. 5.

28 Ó Tuathail, Gearóid, Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Space (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 53Google Scholar.

29 The significance of assemblage theory for a critical geopolitics, Dittmer (2013) suggests, is that it emphasises relations of exteriority rather than assuming an enclosed entity such as is evident in the ‘state as organism’ metaphor of classical geopolitics.

30 Gearóid Ó Tuathail, Critical Geopolitics, p. 55.

31 Ibid., p. 62.

32 Ibid., pp. 63–74.

33 Lorraine Dowler and Joanne Sharp, ‘A Feminist Geopolitics?’

34 Simon Dalby, cited in Gearóid Ó Tuathail, Critical Geopolitics, p. 62.

35 See, for example, Campbell, David, Writing Security: US Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Dodds, Klaus, ‘Geopolitics in the Foreign Office: British Representations of Argentina 1945–1961’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19 (1994), pp. 273–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 See, for example, Dittmer, Jason, ‘NATO, the EU and Central Europe: Differing Symbolic Shapes in Newspaper Accounts of Enlargement’, Geopolitics, 10 (2005), pp. 76–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dittmer, Jason and Dodds, Klaus, ‘Popular Geopolitics Past and Future: Fandom, Identities and Audiences’, Geopolitics, 13 (2008), pp. 437–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 See, for example, Hyndman, Jennifer, ‘Feminist Geopolitics Revisited: Body Counts in Iraq’, The Professional Geographer, 59:1 (2007), pp. 35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hyndman, Jennifer, ‘The Question of the Political in Critical Geopolitics: Querying the “Child Soldier” in the “War on Terror”, Political Geography, 29 (2010), pp. 247–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Lorraine Dowler and Joanne Sharp, ‘A Feminist Geopolitics?’

39 Ó Tuathail, Gearóid, ‘“Just Out Looking for a Fight”: American Affect and the Invasion of Iraq’, Antipode, 35:5 (2003), pp. 856–70, 857–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Gearóid Ó Tuathail, ‘“Just Out Looking for a Fight”’, p. 859.

41 Simon Dalby ‘Recontextualising Violence, Power and Nature’; Dalby, Simon ‘Anthropocene Geopolitics: Globalisation, Empire, Enviornment and Critique’, Geography Compass, 1:1 (2007), pp. 103–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Klaus Dodds, ‘Political Geography III’.

43 Thrift, Nigel, ‘It's the little things’, in Dodds, Kenneth and Atkinson, David (eds), Geopolitical Traditions: Critical Histories of a Century in Geopolitical Thought (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 380–7Google Scholar.

44 Power, Marcus and Campbell, David, ‘The State of Critical Geopolitics’, Political Geography, 29:5 (2010), pp. 243–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Müller, Martin, ‘Reconsidering the Concept of Discourse for the Field of Critical Geopolitics: Towards Discourse as Language and Practice’, Political Geography, 27 (2008), pp. 322–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Ibid.

47 Gearóid Ó Tuathail and Simon Dalby, Rethinking Geopolitics; Ashley, Richard K., ‘Foreign policy as political performance’, International Studies Notes, 13 (1987), pp. 51–4Google Scholar.

48 Squire, Vicki, ‘Desert “trash”: Posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics, Political Geography, 38 (2014), pp. 11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Simon Dalby, ‘Anthropocene Geopolitics: Globalisation, Empire, Enviornment and Critique’, p. 116.

50 Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, New Materialisms, pp. 7–15.

51 Ibid., p. 9.

52 See Juanita Sundberg (paper under review).

53 Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, New Materialisms, p. 9.

54 Ibid., pp. 9–10.

55 Cudworth, Erika and Hobden, Stephen, Posthuman International Relations (London: Zed Books, 2011)Google Scholar; Cudworth, Erika and Hobden, Stephen, ‘Complexity, Ecologism and Posthuman Politics’, Review of International Studies, 39:3 (2013), pp. 643–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, New Materialisms, p. 15.

57 Simon Dalby, Anthropocene Geopolitics (see fn. 22 above), p. 112.

58 Bennett, Jane, Vibrant Matter (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

59 Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, New Materialisms, p. 15.

60 Ibid., p. 17.

61 Haraway, Donna, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (London: Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar.

62 Jonathan Metzger, ‘We are Not Alone in the Universe’, available at: {http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2012-02-08-metzger-en.html} 10 June 2013.

63 Jennifer Hyndman, ‘The Question of the Political in Critical Geopolitics’, p. 254.

64 Anderson, Ben and Wylie, John, ‘On Geography and Materiality’, Environment and Planning A, 41 (2009), pp. 318–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Tom Lundborg and Nick Vaughan-Williams, ‘New Materialisms, Discourse Analysis, and International Relations: A Poststructuralist Rejoinder’, presented at the ‘Matter Matters’ conference, University of Lund, 15–16 October 2012.

66 See, for example, Lorraine Dowler and Joanne Sharp, ‘A Feminist Geopolitics?’

67 Barad, Karen, ‘Posthumanist Performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28:3 (2003), pp. 801–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barad, Karen, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Karen Barad, ‘Posthumanist Performativity’, pp. 812–14.

69 Ibid.

70 Lundborg and Vaughan-Williams, ‘New Materialisms, Discourse Analysis, and International Relations’.

71 Karen Barad, ‘Posthumanist Performativity’, p. 819.

72 Foucault, Michel, in Gordon, Colin (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980), p. 184Google Scholar.

73 This is not in tension with a Foucauldian frame of analysis but hones attention more on what might be conventionally understood as physical rather than institutional processes of materialisation.

74 This is reflected in my use of the concept materialdiscursive throughout this article. While a Baradian approach can be criticised for maintaining dualistic concepts even while collapsing their boundaries (material/discursive; natural/cultural; physical/social), this can also be seen as an important step in the process of a deconstructive un-thinking and creative re-thinking such categories. I do not pretend to transcend once and for all such dualisms here, but nor do I think it fair to say that a Baradian approach invites their reinscription.

75 Vicki Squire, ‘Desert “trash”’.

76 Karen Barad, ‘Posthumanist Performativity’, p. 821.

77 On the impossibility of thinking matter as such, see Anderson and Wylie, ‘On Geography and Materiality’.

78 Karen Barad, ‘Posthumanist Performativity’, pp. 802–3.

79 Saward, Michael, The Representative Claim (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Butler, Judith, Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of Sex (London: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar; Butler, Judith, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar.

81 Bialesciwietz, et al. in Dittmer, Jason and Gray, Nicholas (eds), ‘Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday’, Geography Compass, 4:11 (2008), pp. 1664–77, p. 1668Google Scholar.

82 Thrift and Dewsbury, in Dittmer and Gray (eds), ‘Popular Geopolitics 2.0’, p. 1668.

83 Mol, Annemarie, The Body Multiple (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Ibid., p. 43.

85 Ibid., p. viii.

86 Ibid., pp. vii–viii.

87 Ibid., p. 13.

88 According to Simon Dalby, this counts as an appropriate site of analysis if we take it as implicated in the ‘geographical reasoning used in legitimisations of contemporary warfare’. See Dalby, Simon, ‘Recontextualising Violence, Power and Nature: The Next Twenty Years of Critical Geopolitics?’, Political Geography, 29:5 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 Adam Sandor, ‘Camels, 4 x 4s, and White Powdered Substances: The Global and Local Politics of Securing Sahelian Borders’, paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, Toronto, 25–9 March 2014.

90 Ó Tuathail and Dalby, Rethinking Geopolitics, p. 3.

91 Braun, Bruce and Whatmore, Sarah, Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

92 Clark, Nick, ‘Volatile Worlds, Vulnerable Bodies: Confronting Abrupt Climate Change’, Theory, Culture and Society, 27:2–3 (2010), pp. 31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Mark B. Salter (ed.), Making Things International (2015).

94 Vicki Squire, ‘Desert “trash”’.