Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 34
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Baekkeskov, Erik and Öberg, PerOla 2016. Freezing deliberation through public expert advice. Journal of European Public Policy, p. 1.

    Barilan, Y. M. 2016. Review of E. N. Dorff and L. Zoloth, eds.,Jews and Genes: The Genetic Future in Contemporary Jewish Thought1. The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. W10.

    Dolata, Ulrich and Schrape, Jan-Felix 2016. Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements: Collective Action in the Internet Age. Social Movement Studies, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Dolenec, Danijela 2016. Academic Labour, Unemployment and Global Higher Education.

    Duffy, Rosaleen 2016. War, by Conservation. Geoforum, Vol. 69, p. 238.

    Galaz, Victor Österblom, Henrik Bodin, Örjan and Crona, Beatrice 2016. Global networks and global change-induced tipping points. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 189.

    Gjefsen, Mads Dahl 2016. Crafting the expert-advocate: training and recruitment efforts in the carbon dioxide capture and storage community. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, p. 1.

    Gruszczak, Artur 2016. Intelligence Security in the European Union.

    Gruszczak, Artur 2016. Intelligence Security in the European Union.

    Libel, Tamir 2016. Explaining the security paradigm shift: strategic culture, epistemic communities, and Israel’s changing national security policy. Defence Studies, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 137.

    Mulligan, Emer and Oats, Lynne 2016. Tax professionals at work in Silicon Valley. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 52, p. 63.

    Sommer, Udi and Frishman, Olga 2016. Translating Justice: The International Organization of Constitutional Courts. Law & Policy, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 124.

    Willems, Vera 2016. International Courts and Tribunals and Their Linguistic Practices: A Communities of Practice Approach. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique,

    Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Kropp, Kristoffer 2015. A Sociology of Knowledge Approach to European Integration: Four Analytical Principles. Journal of European Integration, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 155.

    Bocse, Alexandra-Maria 2015. Transnational policy networks and the European Union's energy policy. Contemporary Politics, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 294.

    Bueger, Christian 2015. Making Things Known: Epistemic Practices, the United Nations, and the Translation of Piracy. International Political Sociology, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Elliott Armijo, Leslie and Rhodes, Sybil 2015. Can International Relations and Comparative Politics Be Policy Relevant? Theory and Methods for Incorporating Political Context. Politics & Policy, Vol. 43, Issue. 5, p. 611.

    Hansen, Annette Skovsted 2015. Global Alumni Networks: The Inclusion of Fellow Experts from Developing Countries in Epistemic Communities. Forum for Development Studies, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 357.

    Malsch, Ineke Subramanian, Vrishali Semenzin, Elena Hristozov, Danail Marcomini, Antonio Mullins, Martin Hester, Karena McAlea, Eamonn Murphy, Finbarr and Tofail, Syed A. M. 2015. Empowering citizens in international governance of nanotechnologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 17, Issue. 5,

    Pacheco-Vega, Raul 2015. Transnational Environmental Activism in North America: Wielding Soft Power through Knowledge Sharing?. Review of Policy Research, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 146.


Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later


The concept of epistemic communities – professional networks with authoritative and policy-relevant expertise – is well-known thanks to a 1992 special issue of International Organization. Over the past twenty years, the idea has gained some traction in International Relations scholarship, but has not evolved much beyond its original conceptualisation. Much of the research on epistemic communities has been limited to single case studies in articles, rather than broader comparative works, and has focused narrowly on groups of scientists. As a result, it is often assumed, erroneously, that epistemic communities are only comprised of scientists, and that the utility of the concept for understanding International Relations is quite narrow. Consequently, an otherwise promising approach to transnational networks has become somewhat marginalised over the years. This article revisits the concept of epistemic communities twenty years later and proposes specific innovations to the framework. In an increasingly globalising world, transnational actors are becoming progressively more numerous and influential. Epistemic communities are certainly at the forefront of these trends, and a better understanding of how they form and operate can give us a clear demonstration of how knowledge translates into power.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Anthony Zito , ‘Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8:4 (2001), pp. 585603

Amy Verdun , ‘The role of the Delors Committee in the creation of EMU: an epistemic community?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6:2 (1999), pp. 308–28

Clair Gough and Simon Shackley , ‘The respectable politics of climate change: the epistemic communities and NGOs’, International Affairs, 77:2 (2001), pp. 329–45

Jeremy Youde , ‘The Development of a Counter-Epistemic Community: AIDS, South Africa, and International Regimes’, International Relations, 19:4 (2005), pp. 421–39

Mai'a K. Davis Cross , Security Integration in Europe: How Knowledge-based Networks are Transforming the European Union (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011)

Peter Haas , ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46:1 (1992), p. 3

John Peterson and Elizabeth Bomberg , Decision-Making in the European Union (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999)

Kal Raustiala , ‘Domestic institutions and international regulatory cooperation: comparative responses to the convention on biological diversity’, World Politics, 49:4 (1997), pp. 482509

John Peterson , ‘Decision-making in the European Union: towards a framework for analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2:1 (1995), pp. 6993

Andrew Jordan and John Greenway , ‘Shifting agendas, changing regulatory structures and the “new” politics of environmental pollution: British coastal water policy, 1955–1995’, Public Administration, 76 (1998), pp. 669–94

Peter A. Hall , ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25:3 (1993), pp. 275–96

Paul Sabatier , ‘The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5:1 (1998), pp. 98130

Clair Dunlop , ‘Epistemic Communities: A Reply to Toke’, Politics, 20:3 (2000), pp. 137–44

David Toke , ‘Epistemic Communities and Environmental Groups’, Politics, 19:2 (1999), pp. 97102

Adler, ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's Post-Cold War Transformation’, European Journal of International Relations, 14:2 (2008), pp. 195230

Colin Hay , ‘Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: interrogating the process of change’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1:3 (1999), pp. 317–44

Mai'a K. Davis Cross , ‘An EU Homeland Security? Sovereignty vs. Supranational Order’, European Security, 16:1 (2007), pp. 7997

Peter Haas , ‘When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11:4 (2004), pp. 575–6

Katy Wilkinson , Philip Lowe , and Andrew Donaldson . ‘Beyond Policy Networks: Policy Framing and the Politics of Expertise in the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Crisis’, Public Administration, 88:2 (2010), pp. 331–45

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *