Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 51
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abu-Zahra, Nadia Leech, Philip and MacNeil, Leah 2016. Emancipation versus Desecuritization: Resistance and the Israeli Wall in Palestine. Journal of Borderlands Studies, p. 1.

    Bilgin, Pinar 2016. “Contrapuntal Reading” as a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR. International Studies Review, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 134.

    Dixit, Priya 2016. Interrogating representations of “militants” and “terrorists” in the United States’ Militant Imagery Project and the Counterterrorism Calendar. Critical Studies on Terrorism, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Donnelly, Faye 2016. The Palgrave Handbook of Disciplinary and Regional Approaches to Peace.

    Persaud, Randolph B. 2016. Neo-Gramscian Theory and Third World Violence: A Time for Broadening. Globalizations, Vol. 13, Issue. 5, p. 547.

    von Lucke, Franziskus 2016. Linking climate change and security in Mexico: explorations into an attempted securitisation in the Global South. Journal of International Relations and Development,

    Gventer, Celeste Ward Jones, David Martin and Smith, MLR 2015. Deconstructing counter-insurgency: COIN discourse and the devaluation of strategy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 348.

    MacKay, Joseph and Levin, Jamie 2015. A Hegelian realist constructivist account of war, identity, and state formation. Journal of International Relations and Development,

    MacKay, J. 2015. Rethinking the IR theory of empire in late imperial China. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 53.

    Misalucha, Charmaine G. 2015. The challenges facing the global south: perspectives from the Philippines. Bandung: Journal of the Global South, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,

    Robinson, Fiona 2015. A modest proposal: comments on Burke’s security cosmopolitanism. Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 172.

    ANSORGE, JOSEF TEBOHO and BARKAWI, TARAK 2014. Utile forms: power and knowledge in small war. Review of International Studies, Vol. 40, Issue. 01, p. 3.

    Bilgin, Pinar 2014. Critical investigationsinto the international. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 35, Issue. 6, p. 1098.

    Boas, Ingrid 2014. Where is the South in security discourse on climate change? An analysis of India. Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 148.

    Dixit, Priya 2014. Decolonizing visuality in security studies: reflections on the death of Osama bin Laden. Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, p. 337.

    Gventer, Celeste Ward Jones, David Martin and Smith, M. L. R. 2014. The New Counter-insurgency Era in Critical Perspective.

    Hochmüller, Markus and Müller, Markus-Michael 2014. Encountering knowledge production: the International Crisis Group and the making of Mexico’s security crisis. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 705.

    Jabri, Vivienne 2014. Disarming norms: postcolonial agency and the constitution of the international. International Theory, Vol. 6, Issue. 02, p. 372.

    Jones, David Martin and Smith, M. L. R. 2014. Sacred Violence.

    Jones, David Martin and Smith, M. L. R. 2014. Sacred Violence.


The postcolonial moment in security studies


In this article, we critique the Eurocentric character of security studies as it has developed since World War II. The taken-for-granted historical geographies that underpin security studies systematically misrepresent the role of the global South in security relations and lead to a distorted view of Europe and the West in world politics. Understanding security relations, past and present, requires acknowledging the mutual constitution of European and non-European worlds and their joint role in making history. The politics of Eurocentric security studies, those of the powerful, prevent adequate understanding of the nature or legitimacy of the armed resistance of the weak. Through analysis of the explanatory and political problems Eurocentrism generates, this article lays the groundwork for the development of a non-Eurocentric security studies.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *