Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube

  • Justin Garson (a1)
Argument
Argument

As historian Henning Schmidgen notes, the scientific study of the nervous system would have been “unthinkable” without the industrialization of communication in the 1830s. Historians have investigated extensively the way nerve physiologists have borrowed concepts and tools from the field of communications, particularly regarding the nineteenth-century work of figures like Helmholtz and in the American Cold War Era. The following focuses specifically on the interwar research of the Cambridge physiologist Edgar Douglas Adrian, and on the technology that led to his Nobel-Prize-winning research, the thermionic vacuum tube. Many countries used the vacuum tube during the war for the purpose of amplifying and intercepting coded messages. These events provided a context for Adrian's evolving understanding of the nerve fiber in the 1920s. In particular, they provide the background for Adrian's transition around 1926 to describing the nerve impulse in terms of “information,” “messages,” “signals,” or even “codes,” and for translating the basic principles of the nerve, such as the all-or-none principle and adaptation, into such an “informational” context. The following also places Adrian's research in the broader context of the changing relationship between science and technology, and between physics and physiology, in the first few decades of the twentieth century.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Edgar D Adrian . 1913. “Wedensky Inhibition in Relation to the ‘All-Or-None’ Principle in Nerve.” Journal of Physiology 46:384412.

Edgar D Adrian . 1931. “Potential Changes in the Isolated Nervous System of Dytiscus Marginalis.” Journal of Physiology 72:132151.

Edgar D. Adrian , and Detlev W. Bronk . 1929b. “The Discharge of Impulses in Motor Nerve Fibres. Part II. The Frequency of Discharge in Reflex and Voluntary Contractions.” Journal of Physiology 67:119151.

Edgar D. Adrian , and Alexander Forbes . 1922. “The All-Or-Nothing Response of Sensory Nerve Fibers.” Journal of Physiology 56:301330.

Edgar D. Adrian , and Rachel Matthews . 1927a. “The Action of Light on the Eye. Part I. Discharge of Impulses in the Optic Nerve and its Relation to the Electric Changes in the Retina.”Journal of Physiology 63:378414.

Edgar D. Adrian , and Rachel Matthews . 1927b. “The Action of Light on the Eye. Part II. The Processes Involved in Retinal Excitation.” Journal of Physiology 64:279301.

Edgar D. Adrian , and Rachel Matthews . 1928. “The Action of Light on the Eye. Part III. The Interaction of Retinal Neurons.” Journal of Physiology 65:273298.

Edgar D. Adrian , and Karl Umrath . 1929. “The Impulse Discharge from the Pacinian Corpuscle.” Journal of Physiology 68:139154.

Edgar D. Adrian , and Yngve Zotterman . 1926b. “The Impulses Produced by Sensory Nerve Endings. Part 2. The Response of a Single End Organ.” Journal of Physiology 61:157171.

Cornelius Borck . 2008b. “Recording the Brain at Work: The Visible, The Readable, and The Invisible in Electroencephalography.” Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 17:367379.

John K. Bradley , and Elizabeth M. Tansey . 1996. “The Coming of the Electronic Age to the Cambridge Physiological Laboratory: E. D. Adrian's Valve Amplifier in 1921.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 50 (2):217228.

Armando De Palma , and Germana Pareti . 2007. “The Ways of Metaphor in Neuroscience, or Being on the Right or Wrong Track.” Nuncius 22:97214.

John A Fleming . 1920. “The Thermionic Valve in Wireless Telegraphy and Telephony.” Nature 105:716720.

Alexander Forbes , Walter B. Cannon , Johnson O’Connor , Anne M. Hopkins , and Richard Miller . 1926. “Muscular Rigidity with and without Sympathetic Innervation.” Archives of Surgery 13:303328.

Paul Forman . 2010. “(Re)cognizing Postmodernity: Helps for Historians – of Science Especially.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 33:157175.

Robert G. Frank , and Judith H. Goetzl . 1978. “The J. H. B. Archive Report: The Alexander Forbes Papers.” Journal of the History of Biology 11:387393.

Rudolf Höber . 1919. “Ein Verfahren zur Demonstration der Aktionsströme.” Pflüger's Archiv für Physiologie 177:305312.

Lily E Kay . 2001. “From Logical Neurons to Poetic Embodiments of Mind: Warren S. Mcculloch's Project in Neuroscience.” Science in Context 14:591614.

Daniel J. Kevles , and Gerald L. Geison . 1995. “The Experimental Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century.” Osiris 10:97121.

Timothy Lenoir . 1994. “Helmholtz and the Materialities of Communication.” Osiris 9:185207.

Keith Lucas . 1909. “On the Relation between the Electric Disturbance in Muscle and the Propagation of the Excited State.” Journal of Physiology 39:207227.

James A Marcum . 2006. “‘Soup’ vs. ‘Sparks’: Alexander Forbes and the Synaptic Transmission Controversy.” Annals of Science 63:139156.

George A Miller . 1953. “What Is Information Measurement?American Psychologist 8:311.

Claude Shannon . 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27:379423, 623656.

Claude Shannon . 1949. “Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems.” Bell System Technical Journal 28:656715.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 44 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 352 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.