Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Virtually Expert: Modes of Environmental Computer Simulation Modeling

  • Catharina Landström (a1) and Sarah J. Whatmore (a2)
Abstract
Argument

This paper challenges three assumptions common in the literature on expertise: that expertise is linearly derived from scientific knowledge; that experts always align with the established institutional order; and that expertise is a property acquired by individuals. We criticize these ideas by juxtaposing three distinct expert practices involved with flood risk management in England. Virtual engineering is associated with commercial consultancy and relies on standardized software packages to assess local flood inundation. Mathematical experimentation refers to academic scientists creating new digital renderings of the physical dynamics of flooding. Participatory modeling denotes research projects that aim to transform the relationships between experts and local communities. Focusing on different modes of modeling we contribute an analysis of how particular models articulate with specific politics of knowledge as experts form relationships with flood risk management actors. Our empirical study also shows how models can contribute to re-distribution of expertise in local flood risk management.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Olivier Barretau , Francois Bousquet , C. Millier , and J. Weber . 2004. “Suitability of Multi-Agent Simulations to Study Irrigated System Viability: Application to Case Studies in the Senegal River Valley.” Agricultural Systems 80:255275.

Stephen Bocking . 2004. Nature's Experts: Science, Politics and the Environment. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Harry M. Collins , and Robert Evans . 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32:235296.

Frank Fischer . 2009. Democracy and Expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dagmar Haase . 2013. “Participatory Modelling of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in Flood Risk Management.” Natural Hazards 67:7797.

Sheila Jasanoff . 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41:223244.

Frank van Kouwen , Carel Dieperink , Paul P. Schot , Martin J. Wassen . 2009. “Computer-Supported Cognitive Mapping for Participatory Problem Structuring.” Environment and Planning A 41:6381.

Tarja Knuutilla . 2011. “Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-Based Representation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):262271.

Stuart N. Lane , Nicholas A. Odoni , Catharina Landström , Sarah J. Whatmore , Neil Ward , and Susan Bradley . 2011. “Doing Flood Risk Science Differently: An Experiment in Radical Scientific Method.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36:1536.

Catharina Landström , Sarah J. Whatmore , Stuart N. Lane , Nicholas A. Odoni , Neil Ward , and Susan Bradley . 2011. “Co-producing Flood Risk Knowledge: Redistributing Expertise in ‘Participatory Modelling.’Environment and Planning A 43:16171633.

Margaret Morrison , and Mary Morgan . 1999. “Models as Mediating Instruments.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Mary Morgan and Margaret Morrison , 1037. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Helga Nowotny . 2000. “Transgressive Competence: The Narrative of Expertise.” European Journal of Social Theory 3:521.

Nicholas Odoni , and Stuart N. Lane . 2010. “Knowledge-Theoretic Models in Hydrology.” Progress in Physical Geography 34:151171.

Arie Rip . 2003. “Constructing Expertise: In a Third Wave of Science Studies?Social Studies of Science 33:419434.

Véronique Souchère , Lauerent Millair , Javier Echeverie , François Bousquet , Christophe Le Page , and Michel Etienne . 2010. “Co-Constructing with Stakeholders a Role-Playing Game to Initiate Collective Management of Erosive Runoff Risks at the Watershed Scale.” Environmental Modelling & Software 25:13591370.

Mikaela Sundberg . 2009. “The Everyday World of Simulation Modeling: The Development of Parameterizations in Meteorology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 34:162181.

Stephen Turner . 2001. “What Is the Problem with Experts?Social Studies of Science 31:123149.

Nuno Videira , Paula Antunes , Rui Santos . 2009. “Scoping River Basin Management Issues with Participatory Modelling: The Baixo Guadiana Experience.” Ecological Economics 68:965978.

Alexey Voinov , and Francois Bousquet . 2010. “Modelling with Stakeholders.” Environmental Modelling & Software 25 (11):12671281.

Sarah J. Whatmore , and Catharina Landström . 2010. “Manning's n: Putting Roughness to Work.” In How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, edited by Peter Howlett and Mary Morgan , 111135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sarah J. Whatmore , and Catharina Landström . 2011. “Flood-Apprentices: An Exercise in Making Things Public.” Economy and Society 40:582610.

Eric Winsberg . 2003. “Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World.” Philosophy of Science 70:105125.

Brian Wynne . 2003. “Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002),” Social Studies of Science 33:401417.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 204 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.