Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Screening the Psychological Laboratory: Hugo Münsterberg, Psychotechnics, and the Cinema, 1892–1916

  • Jeremy Blatter (a1)
Argument
Argument

According to Hugo Münsterberg, the direct application of experimental psychology to the practical problems of education, law, industry, and art belonged by definition to the domain of psychotechnics. Whether in the form of pedagogical prescription, interrogation technique, hiring practice, or aesthetic principle, the psychotechnical method implied bringing the psychological laboratory to bear on everyday life. There were, however, significant pitfalls to leaving behind the putative purity of the early psychological laboratory in pursuit of technological utility. In the Vocation Bureau, for example, psychological instruments were often deemed too intimidating for a public unfamiliar with the inner workings of experimental science. Similarly, when psychotechnical means were employed by big business in screening job candidates, ethical red flags were raised about this new alliance between science and capital. This tension was particularly evident in Münsterberg's collaboration with the Paramount Pictures Corporation in 1916. In translating psychological tests into short experimental films, Münsterberg not only envisioned a new mass medium for the dissemination of psychotechnics, but a means by which to initiate the masses into the culture of experimental psychology.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Ames Eric. 2005. “The Image of Culture–Or, What Münsterberg Saw in the Movies.” In German Culture in Nineteenth-Century America: Reception, Adaptation, Transformation, edited by Tatlock Lynne and Erlin Matt, 2142. Rochester NY: Camden House.
Anon. 1912. “Motion Pictures to Test Auto Drivers.” The Moving Picture World 13, 20 July, p. 250.
Anon. 1913. “Denies Chauffeurs’ Test. Prof. Muensterberg Calls Fake a Story of Auto Experiment.” New York Times, 14 September 14, p. X16.
Anon. 1914a. “Munsterberg to Pick Salesmen by Psychology.” Boston Journal, 7 November, p. 12.
Anon. 1914b. “Uses a Jig Saw Puzzle to Test Job Applicants, Professor Munsterberg Applied Psychological Tests to 35.” Boston Morning Journal, 9 November, p. 12.
Anon. 1916a. “Munsterberg Speaks at Paramount Reception.” Motography, 27 May, p. 1215.
Anon. 1916b. “Teaches Psychology on Screens: Munsterberg is Paramount Editor.” Motography, 26 February, p. 465.
Anon. 1916c. “Munsterberg, Too, Goes in for Movies. Psychologist's Films to Show Us if We Fit Our Jobs.” New York Tribune, 14 February, p. 2.
Anon. 1916d. “Muensterberg in the Movies.” Evening Ledger, 26 February.
Ash Mitchell G. 2003. “Psychology.” In Cambridge History of Science Volume 7: The Modern Social Sciences, edited by Porter Theodor M. and Ross Dorothy, 251274. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Baker David B., and Savickas Mark L.. 2005. “The History of Vocational Psychology: Antecedents, Origin, and Early Development.” In Handbook of Vocational Psychology, edited by Walsh W. Bruce and Savickas Mark L., 1550. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
Baritz Loren. 1960. The Servants of Power: A History of the Use of Social Science in American Industry. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Bergengren Ralph. 1911. “Psychological Apparatus for Testing Chauffeurs.” Scientific American 105:29, 38.
Bloomfield Meyer. 1913. “Closing Address.” In Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Vocational Guidance, New York, October 23 to 26, 189–192.
Boring Edwin G. 1929. A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: D. Appleton–Century Company.
Bowser Eileen. 1990. The Transformation of Cinema, 1907–1915. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Brain Robert Michael. 2012. “Self-Projection: Hugo Münsterberg on Empathy and Oscillation in Cinema Spectatorship.” Science in Context 25:329353.
Bridges James W. 1914. “An Experimental Study of Decision Types and Their Mental Correlates.” Psychological Monographs 17:172.
Bringmann Wolfgang G., et al. 1980. “The Establishment of Wundt's Laboratory: An Archival and Documentary Study.” In Wundt Studies, edited by Bringmann Wolfgang and Tweney Ryan, 123157. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.
Brown Elspeth H. 2005. The Corporate Eye: Photography and the Rationalization of American Commercial Culture, 1884–1929. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bruce H. Addington. 1911. “Psychology and Business.” Outlook 99:3236.
Bruce H. Addington. 1913. “Choosing a Career.” Metropolitan (July):42–44.
Bruno Giuliana. 2009. “Film, Aesthetics, Science: Hugo Münsterberg's Laboratory of Moving Images.” Grey Room 36:88113.
Burnett Charles T. 1906. “The Estimation of Number.” Harvard Psychological Studies 2:349404.
Burnham John C. 1987. How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the United States. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Burnham John C. 1988. Paths into American Culture: Psychology, Medicine, and Morals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Burnham John C. 2009. Accident Prone: A History of Technology, Psychology, and Misfits of the Machine Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burtt Harold E. 1917. “Professor Münsterberg's Vocational Tests.” Journal of Applied Psychology 1:202213.
Camfield Thomas. 1973. “The Professionalization of American Psychology, 18701917.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 9:6675.
Canales Jimena. 2001. “Exit the Frog, Enter the Human: Physiology and Experimental Psychology in Nineteenth-Century Astronomy.” British Journal for the History of Science 34:173197.
Capshew James H. 1992. “Psychologists on Site: A Reconnaissance of the Historiography of the Laboratory.” American Psychologist (February):132–142.
Capshew James H. 1999. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll Noël. 1988. “Film/Mind Analogies: The Case of Hugo Munsterberg.” Journal of Aesthetic and Art Criticism 46:489499.
Carson John. 1993. “Army Alpha, Army Brass, and the Search for Army Intelligence.” Isis 84:278309.
Cartwright Lisa. 2011. “The Hands of the Projectionist.” Science in Context 24:443464
Child Richard Washburn. 1915. “The Man-Screen.” Cosmopolitan Magazine 58:647649.
Colapietro Vincent. 2000. “Let's All Go to the Movies: Two Thumbs up for Hugo Münsterberg's ‘The Photoplay.’“ Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36:477501.
Coon Deborah J. 1992. “Testing the Limits of Sense and Science: American Experimental Psychologists Combat Spiritualism, 1880–1920.” American Psychologist 47:143151.
Coon Deborah. 1993. “Standardizing the Subject: Experimental Psychologists, Instrospection, and the Quest for a Technoscientific Ideal.” Technology and Culture 34:757783.
Curtis Scott. 1996. “‘Like a Hailstorm on the Nerves of Modern Man’: Cinema, Legibility, and the Body in Germany, 1895–1914.” Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa.
Curtis Scott. 2011. “‘Tangible as Tissue’: Arnold Gesell, Infant Behavior, and Film Analysis.” Science in Context 24:417442.
Danziger Kurt. 1980. “The History of Introspection Reconsidered.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16:241262.
Danziger Kurt. 1990. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Daston Lorraine, and Galison Peter. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Davis Robert C. 1970. “The Brass Age of Psychology.” Technology and Culture 11:604612.
Feingold Gustave A. 1915. “Recognition and Discrimination.” Psychological Monographs 18:1128.
Fielding Raymond. 1970. “Hale's Tours: Ultrarealism in the Pre-1910 Motion Picture.” Cinema Journal 10:3447.
Forman Paul. 2007. “The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology.” History and Technology 23 (March/June):1152.
Fredericksen Donald. 1977. The Aesthetic of Isolation in Film Theory: Hugo Münsterberg. North Stratford NH: Ayer Publishing.
Friedman Walter A. 2004. The Birth of a Salesman: The Transformation of Selling in America. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Gerstner David A. 2006. Manly Arts: Masculinity in Early American Cinema. Durham: Duke University Press.
Griffith Richard. 1970. “Foreword.” In The Film: A Psychological Study, by Münsterberg Hugo, v-xv. Mineola: Dover Publications.
Gundlach Horst. 2007. “What Is a Psychological Instrument?” In Psychology's Territories: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives from Different Disciplines, edited by Ash Mitchell and Sturm Thomas, 195224. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hale Matthew. 1980. Human Science and Social Order: Hugo Münsterberg and the Origins of Applied Psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hansen Miriam. 1991. From Babel to Babylon: Spectatorship in American Silent Film. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
James William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Kevles Daniel J. 1968. “Testing the Army's Intelligence: Psychologists and the Military in World War I.” Journal of American History 55:565581.
Kittler Friedrich. 1999. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Krows Arhur Edwin. 1941. “Motion Pictures–Not for Theaters.” Educational Screen 19:107109.
Kuklick Bruce. 1977. The Rise of American Philosophy: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1860–1930. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kusch Martin. 1999. Psychological Knowledge: A Social History and Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Lamiell James T. 2003. Beyond Individual and Group Difference: Human Individuality, Scientific Psychology and William Stern's Critical Personalism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Landecker Hannah. 2006. “Microcinematography and the History of Science and Film.” Isis 97:121132.
Landy Frank J. 1992. “Hugo Münsterberg: Victim or Visionary?Journal of Applied Psychology 77:787802.
Langdale Allan. 2002. “Editor's Introduction: S(t)imulation of Mind: The Film Theory of Hugo Münsterberg.” In Hugo Münsterberg on Film. The Photoplay: A Psychological Study and Other Writings, edited by Langdale Allan, 141. London and New York: Routledge.
Lanzoni Susan. 2012. “Empathy in Translation: Movement and Image in the Psychological Laboratory.” Science in Context 25:301327.
Malin Brenton J. 2009. “Mediating Emotion: Technology, Social Science, and Emotion in the Payne Fund Motion-Picture Studies.” Technology and Culture 50:366390.
Mancini Elaine. 1983. “Theory and Practice: Hugo Münsterberg and the Early Films of D. W. Griffith.” New Orleans Review 10:154160.
Mason Gregory. 1914. “Teaching by the Movies.” The Outlook 107:963970.
McComas Henry Clay. 1911. “Some Types of Attention.” Psychological Monographs 13:158.
Meskill David. 2010. Optimizing the German Workforce: Labor Administration from Bismarck to the Economic Miracle. New York: Berghahn Books.
Morawski Jill G, ed. 1988. The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Morawski Jill. 2007. “Scientific Selves: Discerning the Subject and the Experimenter in Experimental Psychology in the United States, 1900–1935. In Psychology's Territories: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives from Different Disciplines, edited by Ash Mitchell and Sturm Thomas, 129148. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Moskowitz Merle J. 1977. “Hugo Münsterberg: A Study in the History of Applied Psychology.” American Psychologist 32:824842.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1893The New Psychology, and Harvard's Equipment for Teaching It.” Harvard Graduates’ Magazine 1:201209.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1895. “The New Psychology.” Journal of Education 41:332333.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1908. On the Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology and Crime. New York: McClure Company.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1909. “The Psychological Laboratory.” In Reports of the President and the Treasurer of Harvard College 1907–08, 259–260. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1910. “Finding a Life Work.” McClure's Magazine 24:398403.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1912a. Vocation and Learning. St. Louis: Peoples University.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1912b. “Experimental psychology und Berufswahl.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogsische Psychologie und experimentelle Pädagogik 13:17.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1913a. Psychology and Industrial Efficiency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1913b. “Mending Misfits in the World Workshops,” The Sun, 9 March, sec. 5, p. 2.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1914a. Grundzüge der Psychotechnik. Leipzig: Barth.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1914b. Psychology General and Applied. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1915a. “Why We Go to the ‘Movies.’Cosmopolitan 60 (December 15):2232.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1915b. Business Psychology. Chicago: La Salle Extension University.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1916a. The Photoplay: A Psychological Study. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Münsterberg Hugo. 1917. “Twenty-Five Years in America: The First Chapter of an Unfinished Autobiography.” Century 94:3448.
Napoli Donald S. 1981. Architects of Adjustment: The History of the Psychological Profession in the United States. Port Washington: Kennikate Press.
Noble David. 1979. America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
O’Donnell John. 1985. The Origins of Behaviorism. New York: New York University Press.
Parsons Frank. 1909. Choosing a Vocation. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Pegge Denis C. 1949. “Another Forgotten Critic.” Sight and Sound 18:7880.
Pettit Michael J. 2007. “The Unwary Purchaser: Consumer Psychology and the Regulation of Commerce in America.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 43:379399.
Popplestone John A., and McPherson Marion White. 1984. “Pioneer Psychology Laboratories in Clinical Settings.” In Explorations of Psychology in the United States, edited by Brožek Josef, 196272. London: Bucknell University Press.
Reed James. 1990. “Robert Yerkes and the Mental Testing Movement.” In Psychological Testing and American Society, 1890–1930, edited by Sokal Michael, 7594. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Ricker Charles Sherwood. 1910. “Psychology and the Chauffeur.” Harvard Illustrated Magazine 11:185188.
Rose Nikolas. 1998. Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schaffer Simon. 1988. “Astronomers Mark Time: Discipline and the Personal Equation.” Science in Context 2:115145.
Schmidgen Henning. 2003. “Time and Noise: The Stable Surroundings of Reaction Time Experiments, 1860–1890.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34:237275.
Schmidgen Henning. 2010. “Münsterberg's Photoplays: Instruments and Models at Freiburg and Harvard (1891–1893).” The Virtual Laboratory (ISSN ). Online publication: http://vlp.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/references?id=art71, last accessed December 13, 2012.
Schweinitz Jörg. 1996. “Psychotechnik, idealistische Ästhetik und der Film als mental strukturierter Wahrnehmungsraum: Die Filmtheorie von Hugo Münsterberg.” In Hugo Münsterberg, Das Lichtspiel: Eine psychologische Studie (1916) und andere Schriften zum Kino, edited by Schweinitz Jörg, 926. Vienna: Synema.
Schweintiz Jörg. 2006. “The Aesthetic Idealist as Efficiency Engineer: Hugo Münsterberg's Theories of Perception, Psychotechnics and Cinema.” In Film 1900: Technology, Perception, Culture, edited by Ligensa Annemone and Kreimeier Klaus, 7786. New Barnet UK: John Libbey.
Sokal Michael, ed. 1990. Psychological Testing and American Society, 1890–1930. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Spillmann Jutta, and Spillmann Lothar. 1993. “The Rise and Fall of Hugo Münsterberg.” Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences 29:322338.
Timberg Bernard M. 1980. “E = MC2 and the Birth of Film.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 22:263285.
Stern William. 1903a. “Angewandte Psychologie.” Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage 1:445.
Stern William. 1903b. “Aussagestudium.” Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage 1:4678.
van Strien Pieter J. 1998. “Early Applied Psychology between Essentialism and Pragmatism: The Dynamics of Theory, Tools, and Clients.” History of Psychology 1:205234.
von Mayrhauser Richard T. 1990. “The Manager, the Medic, and the Mediator: The Clash of Professional Psychological Styles and the Wartime Origins of Group Mental Testing.” In Psychological Testing in American Society, 1890–1930, edited by Sokal Michael, 128157. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Ward Steven C. 2002. Modernizing the Mind: Psychological Knowledge and the Remaking of Society. Wesport CT: Praeger.
Whipple Guy Montrose. 1914. Manual of Mental and Physical Tests, Part I: Simpler Processes. Baltimore: Warwick & York.
Wicclair Mark R. 1978. “Film Theory and Hugo Münsterberg's The Film: A Psychological Study.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 12:3350.
Wiebe Robert H. 1967. The Search for Order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill and Wang.
Winter Alison. 2004. “Screening Selves: Sciences of Memory and Identity on Film, 1930–1960.” History of Psychology 7:367401.
Winter Alison. 2012. Memory: Fragments of a Modern History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Woolley Helen T. 1913. “The Psychological Laboratory as an Adjunct to a Vocational Bureau.” In Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Vocational Guidance, New York, 1912, October 23–26, 84–88.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 47 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 313 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.