Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Failing to Adapt: Institutional Barriers to RCOs Engagement in Transformation of Social Welfare

  • Jenny Phillimore (a1) and Lisa Goodson (a2)

Britain has entered a new era of super-diversity and many regions of the UK are experiencing the arrival of new communities. Refugee Community Organisations (RCOs) have developed following the arrival of new asylum seeking and refugee communities, and have been charged with the role of supporting the integration of these newcomers. However, there is much evidence to suggest that they are functioning only with individuals rather than working with institutions to transform systems and ensure welfare provision is adapted to account for diverse needs. This paper looks at the role of RCOs in attempting transformation and, using data collected through survey, interviews, and participatory action research, examines the extent to which RCOs are able to engage with the public and wider voluntary sector, to ensure that refugees' welfare needs can be met. It finds that in addition to the much-researched functional barriers to transformation, there are major institutional barriers to engagement. Institutions have failed to adapt their systems to enable representation of new communities instead expecting RCOs to build their own capacity to communicate. The paper ends by offering some ideas around resourcing RCOs to be represented and developing the capacity of institutions to adapt to new diversity.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Banton (2001), ‘National Integration in France and Britain’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27, 1, 151–68.

J. W. Berry (1997), ‘Immigration, acculturation and adaptation’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 1, 568.

M. Korac (2003), ‘Integration and how we facilitate it: a comparative study of the settlement experiences of refugees in Italy and the Netherlands’, Sociology, 37, 1, 5168.

E. Mestheneos and E. Ioannidi (2002), ‘Obstacles to refugee integration in the European Union member states’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 15, 3, 304–20.

J. Moya (2005), ‘Immigrants and associations: a global and historical perspective’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 5, 833–64.

V. Robinson , R. Andersson and S. Musterd (2003), Spreading the Burden? A Review of Policies to Disperse Asylum Seekers and Refugees, Bristol: Policy Press.

M. Schrover and F. Vermeulen (2005), ‘Immigrant organisations’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 5, 823–32.

S. Vertovec (2008), ‘Super-diversity and its implications’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 6, 1024–54.

R. Zetter , D. Griffiths and N. Sigona (2005), ‘Social capital or social exclusion? The impact of asylum-seeker dispersal on UK refugee community organisations’, Community Development Journal, 40, 2, 169–81.

R. Zetter and M. Pearl (2000), ‘The minority within the minority: refugee community based organisations in the UK and the impact of restrictionalism’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26, 4, 675–98.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 132 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.