Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hughes, Nathan and Munoz-Guzman, Carolina 2015. Understanding and Supporting “Families with Complex Needs”: An Editorial. Social Sciences, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, p. 1335.


    Tsekoura, Maria 2015. “Providing a Roof That Allows One to Dream of a Better Life”: A Case Study of Working with Families in Extreme Poverty. Social Sciences, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 260.


    Batty, Elaine 2014. Learning and Soft Outcomes: Evidence from Intensive Intervention Projects. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 13, Issue. 03, p. 357.


    Thoburn, June Cooper, Neil Brandon, Marian and Connolly, Sara 2013. The place of “think family” approaches in child and family social work: Messages from a process evaluation of an English pathfinder service. Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 228.


    ×

Models and Approaches in Family-Focused Policy and Practice

  • Nathan Hughes (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746410000266
  • Published online: 01 September 2010
Abstract

A review of models and approaches to family-based policy and service provision for those at risk of social exclusion suggests three distinct categories. In the first category, approaches seek to strengthen the ability of family members to offer support to a primary service user within that family. In the second category, family members are recognised as having their own specific and independent needs arising out of their relationship with the primary service user. The third category includes ‘whole family approaches’ focused on shared needs and strengths that could not be dealt with through a focus on family members as individuals.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. Goldson and J. Jamieson (2002), ‘Youth crime, the ‘parenting deficit’ and state intervention: a contextual critique’, Youth Justice, 2, 2, 8299.

E. Burney and L. Gelsthorpe (2008), ‘Do we need a naughty step? Rethinking the parenting order after ten years’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 5, 470485.

W. Beardslee , T. Gladstone , E. Wright and A. Cooper (2003), ‘A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms of children at risk’, Pediatrics, 112, 2, 119–31.

L. Brown (2003), ‘Mainstream or margin? The current use of family group conferences in child welfare practice in the UK’, Child & Family Social Work 8, 4, 331–40.

A. Copello , E. Williamson , J. Orford and E. Day (2006) ‘Implementing and evaluating social behaviour and network therapy in drug treatment practice in the UK: a feasibility study’, Addictive Behaviors, 31, 5, 802–10.

D. P. Farrington and B. C. Welsh (2003), ‘Family-based prevention of offending: a meta-analysis’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 36, 2, 127–51.

W. McFarlane , R. Lukens , B. Link , R. Dushay , S. Deakins , M. Newmark , E. Dunne , B. Horen and J. Toran (1995), ‘Multiple family groups and psychoeducation in the treatment of schizophrenia’, Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 679–87.

D. Stephen and P. Squires (2004), They're still children and entitled to be children’, Journal of Youth Studies, 7, 3, 351–69.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×