Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

The Notion of Family in Lithuanian and Swedish Social Legislation

  • Karina Nygren (a1), Rasa Naujanienė (a2) and Lennart Nygren (a3)
Abstract

This study examines the conceptualisation of family in key social legislative documents guiding social workers in two European countries, whose welfare systems have previously been labelled as re-familialised (Lithuania) or de-familialised (Sweden). The focus is on the concept of family as delineated on three legislative levels: the constitutional level, the general family policy level, and the child welfare policy level. ‘Family’ is explicit in Lithuanian law, and the regulation of family formation and responsibility is imperative, while this is much less so in Swedish law. The analysis reveals how general welfare systems (regime-types) are linked to legislative frameworks, which, in turn, provide fundamentally different conditions for social work in different contexts.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Notion of Family in Lithuanian and Swedish Social Legislation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Notion of Family in Lithuanian and Swedish Social Legislation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Notion of Family in Lithuanian and Swedish Social Legislation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Aidukaite, J. (2006) ‘Reforming family policy in the Baltic States: the views of the elites’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39, 123.
Aidukaite, J., Bogdoanova, N. and Guogis, A. (2012) Gerovės Valstybės Kūrimas Lietuvoje: Mitas ar Realybė?, Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.
Aspalter, C. (2017) ‘Welfare regime analysis: 30 years in the making’, International Social Work, doi.org/10.1177/0020872817710551.
Bernotas, D. and Guogis, A. (2006) Globalizacija, Socialinė Apsauga ir Baltijos Šalys, Mykolas Romeris University.
Bloemraad, I. (2013) ‘The promise and pitfalls of comparative research design in the study of migration’, Migration studies, 1, 2746.
Braye, S., Preston-Shoot, M. and Wigley, V. (2013) ‘Deciding to use law in social work practice’, Journal of Social Work, 13, 7595.
Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania (2000) https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.8A39C83848CB/wmtluyIkKY [accessed 05.04.2018].
Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania (1992) http://www3.lrs.lt/home/Konstitucija/Konstitucija.htm [accessed 05.04.2018].
Duffy, J. and Collins, M. E. (2010) ‘Macro impacts on caseworker decision-making in child welfare: a cross-national comparison’, European Journal of Social Work, 13, 3554.
Duvander, A.-Z. and Ferrarini, T. (2013) Sweden's Family Policy under Change: Past, Present, Future, Stockholm: Freidrich Ebert Stiftung, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/10232.pdf [accessed 27.11.2017].
Ellingsen, I. E., Studsrød, I. and Jensen, I. B. (2017) ‘Norsk familiepolitikk og sosialarbeideres familieforståelse’, in Studsrød, I. and Tuastad, S. (eds.) Barneomsorg på Norsk: I Samspill Mellom Hjem og Stat, Olso: Universitetsforlaget, 2138.
Elo, S. and Kyngäs, H. (2008) ‘The qualitative content analysis process’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fritzell, J., Gähler, M. and Nermo, M. (2007) ‘Vad hände med 1990-talets stora förlorargrupper? Välfärd och ofärd under 2000-talet’, Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 2–3, 110–33.
Gilbert, N. (2012) ‘A comparative study of child welfare systems: abstract orientations and concrete results’, Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 532–6.
Hantrais, L. (2004) Family Policy Matters, Bristol: Polity Press.
Hearn, J., Pösö, T., Smith, C., White, S. and Korpinen, J. (2004) ‘What is child protection? Historical and methodological issues in comparative research on lastensuojelu/child protection’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 2841.
Höjer, I. and Sjöblom, Y. (2010) ‘Young people leaving care in Sweden’, Child and Family Social Work, 15, 118–27.
Inglehart, R. F. (2008) ‘Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006’, West European Politics, 31, 130–46.
Jones, C. (1985) Patterns of social policy: an introduction to comparative analysis, London: Tavistock.
Kuronen, M. (2010) Research on Families and Family Policies in Europe: State of the Art, Jyskelä: Family Research Center, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277066399_Research_on_Families_and_Family_policies_in_Europe_State_of_the_Art [accessed 10.10.2017].
Leitner, S. (2003) ‘Varieties of familialism: the caring function of the family in comparative perspective’, European societies, 5, 353–75.
Lister, R. (1994) ‘“She has other duties” - Women, citizenship and social security’, in Baldwin, S. and Falkingham, J. (eds.), Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model, New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 3144.
Lundqvist, Å. and Roman, C. (2008) ‘Construction(s) of Swedish Family Policy 1930–2000’, Journal of Family History, 33, 216–36.
Lundström, T. and Sallnäs, M. (2010) ‘Sweden - a family service model with tensions’, in Hämäläinen, J., Littlechild, B., Chytil, O., Sramata, M. and Jovelin, E. (eds.) Evolution of Child Protection and Child Welfare Policies in Selected European Countries, Ostrava, Czech Republic: University of Ostrava - ERIS with Albert Publisher, 277–92.
Mazeikiene, N., Naujaniené, R. and Ruskus, J. (2014) ‘What is mixed in welfare mix? Welfare ideologies at stake in the Lithuanian case of social service delivery’, European Journal of Social Work, 17, 641–55.
Meeuwisse, A. and Swärd, H. (2007) ‘Cross-national comparisons of social work - a question of initial assumptions and levels of analysis’, European Journal of Social Work, 10, 482–96.
Moberg, L. (2017) Marketization in Swedish Eldercare: Implications for Users, Professionals, and the State, PhD, Uppsala University.
MSSL (2016/2017) Social Report, Vilnius: Ministry for Social Security and Labour, https://socmin.lrv.lt/uploads/socmin/documents/files/pdf/13545_social-report-2016-2017.pdf [accessed 20.11.2017].
Murray, L. and Barnes, M. (2010) ‘Have families been rethought? Ethic of care, family and “whole family” approaches’, Social Policy and Society, 9, 533–44.
Ooms, T. (1990) ‘Families and government: implementing a family perspective in public policy’, Social Thought, 16, 6178.
Republic of Lithuania Law on Fundamentals of Protection of the Rights of the Child (1996) https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.C8205E261830/DPCxAtIHWU [accessed 05.04.2018].
Republic of Lithuania Law on Social Services (2006) https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.91609F53E29E/ijQCINVduM [accessed 05.04.2018].
Reynaert, D., Bouverne-de-Bie, M. and Vandevelde, S. (2009) ‘A review of children's rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child’, Childhood, 16, 518–34.
Rush, M. and Keenan, M. (2014) ‘The social politic of social work: anti-oppressive social work dilemmas in twenty-first-century welfare regimes’, British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1436–53.
Russell, J. W. (2011) Double Standard: Social Policy in Europe and the United States, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Saxonberg, S. (2013) ‘From defamilialization to degenderization: toward a new welfare typology’, Social Policy and Administration, 47, 2649.
Saxonberg, S. and Sirovátka, T. (2006) ‘Failing family policy in post-communist central Europe’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9, 185202.
Scourfield, J. and Welsh, I. (2003) ‘Risk, reflexivity and social control in child protection: new times or same old story?’, Critical Social Policy, 23, 398420.
Statistics Lithuania (2016) ‘ Socalinés Paslaugos 2015 M.’, https://socmin.lrv.lt/uploads/socmin/documents/files/pdf/11846_sd-soc-paslaugos-2015.pdf [accessed 09.05.2018].
Thorén, K. H. (2008) “Activation Policy in Action”. A Street-Level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State, Diss., The University of Chicago.
Worldvaluesurvey.org. (2018) ‘WVS Database’, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp?CMSID=Findings [accessed 05.04.2018].
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed